The people you responded do didn't refer to or imply race. Of course there's always steve knight, but he's an exception in that regard (still can't figure him out).
Again you're focused on race when others have given indications why they dislike Trump, having nothing to do with whether they're White.
You made it about their race and religion as if Jewish Americans and White Christian Americans are each singular entities. Generally I don't claim the accomplishments of others simply because we share some common ethnicity.
It's the same pattern over and over.
I guess this one could have referred strictly to Judaism rather than the race.
Infowars tends to abuse statistics.
It takes a considerable amount of time to go through these silly infographics. They're usually poorly cited, referring to long documents without indication of what section they are pointing to. The infowars one in particular is quite misleading. They use the largest percentages possible so that it sounds like a racial attribute. They don't cite the raw numbers per 100,000 people in their sample population as that would indicate that these crimes are ultimately carried out by a small subset of the overall population, even when restricted to a single race.
The people you responded (with the possible exception of steve knight if he's in there) don't seem to have a problem with White people. White people are individuals, just like people of any other race.
You don't seem to have much recent, real-world life experience.
You talk like such an idealist it comes across as foolish. Its like I said before Political Correctness = intellectual dishonesty.
People like you don't see cause and effect, only self righteousness. You have a relationship with your own ego and you have no sense of reality and solution based thinking.
For example, that video I posted about the snake and the mental condition behind people who encourage us to keep letting immigrants overrun the nations.
Can you deny thats how muslims see us? (Which is the main thesis of the simple snake analogy) The fact our parasitic enemies not just hate us but openly admit they want to destroy us and the west. Like coming from the mouth of the beast, not hiding it. Just obvious in plain view:
we would kill you if we get the chance.
Not all immigrants are terrorists, but all muslim terrorists are muslim. And a majority of muslims are brainwashed to hate Americans (which is easy to do) And all we can control is knowing who is muslim or not, we can't control who is the terrorists. Logistics of reality tell us we have only two main options.
One option is to allow all Muslims in and hope we find the bad apples manually (like now). The other option is to filter most of them out and make sure none of the bad apples get through.
One solution leads to destruction, one to safety.
So, saying "not all immigrants are terrorists" is not a solution. Its a roadblock that prevents safety. Its simply a logistical problem that leads to destruction. Essentially you're saying we cant protect ourselves because it could lead to offending someone.
So what is more important. Protecting your people in your civilization? Or being correct about this "problem"
Do you understand the difference between logistical effectiveness and theoretical correctness?
In other words: when you do x... y will happen. Do we want Y, the final result to happen?
As opposed to: x is correct to do, I will do x, even knowing y will actually happen? (or not even thinking that far.)
Like I said before, the solutions to these problems are somewhere in the realm of "having to do something a little extreme" for the good of the nation (profiling by ethnic background). Thats the logistical reality and what we need for peace and safety.
Weather or not that comes across as vaguely allegorical to what Hitler or the KKK did should not factor in. A solution is a solution. (in b4 "final solution' joke)
We should do what is right, not what is "correct"
Im not sure someone with the mentally ill liberal type genetics can comprehend such a concept: that actions have real life consequences. People like that are not fit to be leaders.
If you tell me we should do what is correct, not what is best for our country, and willingly let us be destroyed, I would not want you as my leader, and I would hope the rest of the country agrees that we shouldn't let ourselves be destroyed.
All the solutions to our current chaos involve some extreme measures, thats why its ok that Trump threatens to be a little extreme, we need some extreme solutions because the USA is extremely ****** up.
