Apple Withholds Republican Convention Donations Over Trump Politics

[Bobby Corwen]

Bobby, if you have to state that you are or aren't something in such basic terms, e.g. "I'm not racist", that usually means there is a good case that you are acting the opposite of what you are saying.

And yet here I am, defying that common myth lol

 

[Renzatic]

Its a cluster**** of random irrelevant information lol

I don't even think you have a real point, just threw those documents out there and hope they stick or prove something? lmao

The first link I posted are violent crime statistics broken down by type of crime, race and age of perpetrator, ect. ect. ect. The second link concerns itself specifically with black crime, and directly addresses the issue of interracial crime.

It'd take you half an hour, an hour at most, to read through them both. If you jump in here and say "olol, I'm not wasting my time with that", then you have no one to blame for your blissful ignorance but yourself.

 

[Bobby Corwen]

The first link I posted are violent crime statistics broken down by type of crime, race and age of perpetrator, ect. ect. ect. The second link concerns itself specifically with black crime, and directly addresses the issue of interracial crime.

It'd take you half an hour, an hour at most, to read through them both. If you jump in here and say "olol, I'm not wasting my time with that", then you have no one to blame for your blissful ignorance but yourself.

Ok, so the first one doesnt refute that infographic.

Im here on the second in the interracial crime section...

To summarize, it shows crime statistics against black people up to about 2005. My info graphic showed crime statistics against white people by black people up to about 2010.

So what exactly am I looking for here? Page 3ish?

I don't get it lol.

 

[Piggie]

Bobby, if you have to state that you are or aren't something in such basic terms, e.g. "I'm not racist", that usually means there is a good case that you are acting the opposite of what you are saying.

OMG, I have told people I'm not Gay!!!!!

 

[Renzatic]

Ok, so the first one doesnt refute that infographic.

Im here on the second in the interracial crime section...

Cross your references. The second only does go up to 2005, but the first makes accounts all the way up to 2014, showing an overall downward trend in violent crime over the next 10 years, hitting a 20 year low around 2010. There's no evidence of a sudden spike in interracial crime during that time.

If black on white crime jumped from 10% in 2005 to around 80% in 2014, it would've been remarked upon.

 

[lowendlinux]

Cross your references. The second only does go up to 2005, but the first makes accounts all the way up to 2014, showing an overall downward trend in violent crime over the next 10 years, hitting a 20 year low around 2010. There's no evidence of a sudden spike in interracial crime during that time.

If black on white crime jumped from 10% in 2005 to around 80% in 2014, it would've been remarked upon.

OK, I'm now convinced you are a masochist

 

[Renzatic]

OK, I'm now convinced you are a masochist

Nope! Just stubborn.

 

[villicodelirant]

Bobby, if you have to state that you are or aren't something in such basic terms, e.g. "I'm not racist", that usually means there is a good case that you are acting the opposite of what you are saying.

"Some of my best friends have to state they're not racist!"

 

[thekev]

One thing that both left and right wing people agree on is that this country USA is ****ed up!

Trump is the best and only possible chance we have to fix things and we need major changes. He's the only one aggressive and strong and bold enough to do something significant.

What is your problem?

Do you realize how cliche your attitude is? Its people like you who have disgusting outrage and overreaction that helped get him so much support anyway. Nobody takes over reactionary people like you serious.

Most of you come across as racist and anti-white.

The people you responded do didn't refer to or imply race. Of course there's always steve knight, but he's an exception in that regard (still can't figure him out).

So essentially what you're saying is that white men have small pee-pees?

Yet supposedly anti-Trumpers say he's the racist one.



Yeah thats exactly what the majority of anti-trump people demonstrate and expose about themselves: They hate rich white men.

Again you're focused on race when others have given indications why they dislike Trump, having nothing to do with whether they're White.

Judaism isn't a race. Its a cult.

I spent a year selling Dead Sea products at an upscale location working with Israelis straight off the boat and they let me into their inner circle because I was a good salesman and taught me all their secrets and attitudes. I know exactly how they think and how they see white Christian Americans who are the backbone of this country.

We would be sitting there buttering up a customer acting all nice and exotic and patronizing and as soon as they leave they cuss them out under their breath after they took their money like the goyim that they were.

You made it about their race and religion as if Jewish Americans and White Christian Americans are each singular entities. Generally I don't claim the accomplishments of others simply because we share some common ethnicity.

No I don't really judge people like that. All Im saying is that the scary thing is, these people share similar life outlooks to people who make the final choices in our media.

There isn't some committee out there that people vote and decide on what is good for our countries youth and what is moral and what is immoral and weather or not racial politics, the feminist agenda, extremist liberal theories and other complex issues are good to bombard our kids with.

Nobody ever agreed on this stuff, the world is split and there was never some sort of consensus after much deliberation and everyone agreed we should keep showing black men with white females in every single commercial to influence young girls into interracial sex.

They don't asses what is good for our country and work backwards to have the media fall in line with that thesis.

They asses what is making $$$ and work forwards to do as much as they can for profit and what they can get away with.

Its not a bunch of people who love America making these choices or the fathers of our sons and daughters.

On the contrary the people making these choices hate those American white males and their families.

So right now today if I had a problem with the way things are in the media, all I could do is 1) not watch, 2) convince other people not to watch. (an impossible mountain to climb and the jews know that, they count on that convenient paradigm)

Minorities continue to consume trash media and there will always be money in marketing to them. If you have a black guy and a white girl in an ad it will attract more attention and more money $ than some politically neutral casting.

Is it the right thing as far as society? is that what morals are best for America?

The answer is it doesnt matter, only profit and money does. We allow money to rule and dictate our society, not intelligent and influential leaders who care.

It's the same pattern over and over.

Excellent and brilliant reply.

I have noticed this about peoples opinions; they are always limited by the experience they have in their own class.

Like people don't realize their experience is different than everyone else. And some people can be chronically disconnected.

Especially white liberal cucks who bend over and try to put down their own race, because they secretly feel pity on a whole race of people.

Meanwhile on the other side of the country is some white kid who goes to an all black school and people treat him like crap because the media says its time to be reverse racist. Or he cant get girls because all the girls at his school are brainwashed into thinking he has a small pee-pee by the media or commercials and TV shows always showing the "dumb white guy" character.

And this is all the world as seen by people who hate us.

No not at all. That was rather one example of many varying things on the liberal agenda. But I was more concerned with the rate and consistency of pattern of pairing pretty white women as sex symbols for minorities almost exclusively to the point where being that vs seeing a white male with another race is almost 10:1 in ratio of how its always white women targeted.

There are many such studies on this you can look them up if you want to look further into it. Also a utility of the Jewish world view vs the Christian white male world view being shoved down our throats and on our impressionable youth.

Question for you:

Who do you think has more influence over the average children and teens mental development?

Social media/TV/Movies/Music?

or

Mom and dad?

I guess this one could have referred strictly to Judaism rather than the race.

Again still has nothing to do with the info graphic I posted.

its a commonly posted pic from all over the internet that everyone has seen and is from legit sources.

Heres a link to something that says the same stuff http://www.infowars.com/black-crime-facts-that-the-white-liberal-media-darent-talk-about/

There are such statistics all over the place.

Infowars tends to abuse statistics.

Ok, so the first one doesnt refute that infographic.

Im here on the second in the interracial crime section...

To summarize, it shows crime statistics against black people up to about 2005. My info graphic showed crime statistics against white people by black people up to about 2010.

So what exactly am I looking for here? Page 3ish?

I don't get it lol.

It takes a considerable amount of time to go through these silly infographics. They're usually poorly cited, referring to long documents without indication of what section they are pointing to. The infowars one in particular is quite misleading. They use the largest percentages possible so that it sounds like a racial attribute. They don't cite the raw numbers per 100,000 people in their sample population as that would indicate that these crimes are ultimately carried out by a small subset of the overall population, even when restricted to a single race.

I have never blamed anyone for being born into a particular race.

I have never once said anything racist. Point out what I said that is racist. Otherwise stop calling me that.

The people you responded (with the possible exception of steve knight if he's in there) don't seem to have a problem with White people. White people are individuals, just like people of any other race.

 

[villicodelirant]

So what exactly am I looking for here? Page 3ish?

I didn't follow the thread much, but you are probably looking for this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation



Bonus:

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/If_you_torture_the_data_long_enough,_it_will_confess_to_anything
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/v/vinscully205138.html

It takes a considerable amount of time to go through these silly infographics. They're usually poorly cited, referring to long documents without indication of what section they are pointing to. The infowars one in particular is quite misleading. They use the largest percentages possible so that it sounds like a racial attribute. They don't cite the raw numbers per 100,000 people in their sample population as that would indicate that these crimes are ultimately carried out by a small subset of the overall population, even when restricted to a single race.

This as well, or, more in general, the fact that I personally don't have enough spare time to spend on non-peer reviewed, unscientific "statistics" used by bloggers.

Unfortunately (and don't take this the wrong way) if you haven't had the luxury of a scientific education it's hard to see how, exactly, that's garbage.

 

[marioguarneros]

I've already stopped buying anything Apple because of their foray into politics.

I won't buy anything else from them until they kick their cost cutting bean counting social justice warrior CEO and hire someone who can refocus the company to designing insanely great products again.

I'm probably not alone.

Just out of curiosity which brand of handset do you use now?

You might not want to google it but if you make a list of all the products and services you use and then find out the political ties these companies have you would end up living in an ice shack in Greenland sourcing your own food and clothes from nature.

I get where you are coming from but it is either foolish to single out just one brand or just hypocritical.

 

[Larry-K]

Trump is the best and only possible chance we have to fix things and we need major changes. He's the only one aggressive and strong and bold enough to do something significant.

If he's so "Strong and Bold" Let's see his tax return.

 

[villicodelirant]

No not at all. That was rather one example of many varying things on the liberal agenda. But I was more concerned with the rate and consistency of pattern of pairing pretty white women as sex symbols for minorities almost exclusively to the point where being that vs seeing a white male with another race is almost 10:1 in ratio of how its always white women targeted.

There are many such studies on this you can look them up if you want to look further into it. Also a utility of the Jewish world view vs the Christian white male world view being shoved down our throats and on our impressionable youth.

Bobby, I was taught to respect everybody, and, in the worst case, always assume good faith.

I, however, find two things in your recents posts disturbing.

One is the extreme paranoia in your posts: you seem to hold the belief that

1. There are evil Jews - or evil communists, or evil Michael Bolton fans - who aim to violently obliterate white anglosaxon protestants from 'murica for no particular reason except that they are evil
2. The threat is very real and is going to hurt you personally
3. The solution to this supposedly very real problem is policies that reek of KKK and, arguably, don't do much in the way of progress of humanity.

The other is how you back those conclusions:

1. You keep referencing dubious "facts" and "statistics" that don't come from a peer reviewed scientific publication or at least an academic textbook, which is the way the former get to the laity
2. You use those "statistics" and "facts" to back theories that, just because they do not contradict the "evidence", are in fact not thus proven
3. You use those ill-backed theories to validate dubious, medieval policies that, in the 21st century, go against the most basic common sense.

At this point, before you suggest that "there are peer-reviewed studies" that back your claims (where, please?) and that people should "look it up" I must ask you: do you know, for example, what p-value is without having to look it up on Wikipedia?

I strongly suspect that you are locked in a nefarious pattern which has claimed the minds of a large number of right- and left-leaning, well meaning, honest individuals: you grew up with a certain mindset (which you are entitled to) you don't have the kind of education that allows you to navigate and interpret actual, scientific findings (which you are entitled to) and avidly read blogs and propaganda pieces that supply you with dubious "information" (which you are similarly entitled to, but does not to a lot of good), reinforcing your beliefs and paranoia.

American politics are none of my business, but I am a bit afraid to see one of the largest nuclear powers in the world in the hand of voters who get their ideas from blogs like Alex Jones'.

Don't take this personally, but I think you should stick to the facts more, and not just believe any propaganda piece.

Otherwise, one day you risk buying into that "miraculous cure that the Jewish pharmaceutical lobby doesn't want you to know" and... well, you'll make some quakers rich and possibly die.

 

[Mac32]

Apparently you don't have any understand of history either since all those illegals have entered the country for centuries under both left and right leaning parties. And for nearly 240 years things have been just fine. I'm not saying we should have unlimited immigration or open boarders, but we don't have that now, or have tens of millions coming over the border either despite what you think.

No, YOU don't have any understanding of history. 100 years ago, could the immigrants demand welfare benefits? No. Either they worked hard, or they starved to death. If USA were a poverty-striken third world country, sure you could have open borders. You liberals are using up the hard-working middle class' money, and spending it on millions of uneducated ILLEGAL immigrants pouring over the border - who in many cases don't respect your American values. How do you think that will end for the American social-economical system?

 

[trainwrecka]

If it were up to me, I'd move to a country that doesn't allow ANY immigrants in!

Um... You would move to a country that doesn't allow immigrants. Say what?

 

[AFDoc]

I'd say, "half-ish of the voting country."

That way, when 53% of the country votes, having 50%+50 (one extra for each state) of that is that you win 100% of the electors with 26.5% of the country voting.

He didn't even get half of the republicans in the primary so he's not even close to getting half of the voting pop

According to Apple they don't want the business of all the red states.

You said half the world in your first post referring to Apple products and people not wanting to buy them..... I was referring to your assertion that trump has received 50% of the votes in the country.....

 

[Mac32]

If he's so "Strong and Bold" Let's see his tax return.

Yet, you don't care about Hillary's corruption? Have you looked into her Clinton Foundation, the Russian uranium deal, how she's received tens of millions of dollars from Saudi-Arabia, Qatar and co etc.? Or all the other cases of criminal fraud? Have you looked into the Clinton Universities, which is a clear example of fraud (unlike the Trump University case). Liberals are all about "do as I say, not as I do".

 

[Judo]

Liberals? It seems like Americans don't really know what the term means.

 

[samcraig]

Trump doesn't really want to be president. He just wants to win. He wants to be able to say he won the White House. He's not a politician. He has no experience. He has almost no concept of foreign policy. He's vindictive. While political campaigns can go on the attack - they are almost always done with some level of intelligence. Trump? You only have to look at his twitter feed to understand that he operates at a 3rd grade (or less) mentality. Every post that talks about his opponents have started with name calling. It's not at all presidential.

 

[FieldingMellish]

Trump doesn't really want to be president. He just wants to win. He wants to be able to say he won the White House. He's not a politician. He has no experience. He has almost no concept of foreign policy. He's vindictive. While political campaigns can go on the attach - they are almost always done with some level of intelligence. Trump? You only have to look at his twitter feed to understand that he operates at a 3rd grade (or less) mentality. Every post that talks about his opponents have started with name calling. It's not at all presidential.

We already have a president that dislikes America. It's time we have a president that likes America.

 

[samcraig]

We already have a president that dislikes America. It's time we have a president that likes America.

Trump doens't like America. In fact, most of his rhetoric is about how much he dislikes America.

 

[FieldingMellish]

Trump doens't like America. In fact, most of his rhetoric is about how much he dislikes America.

You've gotten it topsy-turvey. First thing Obama did when president is visit other countries and demean America, the country that voted him as president.

Then Obama proceeded to allow ISIS to grow and become a world wide exporter of terror, along with allowing Syria to explode into an international migrant crisis.

I cannot say with certainty that the Obama presidency cannot get any worse than it's been.

Trump will be a relief.

 

[appledefenceforce]

LOL there are people who support Donal Scum on this website? Not surprised tbh.

 

[samcraig]

You've gotten it topsy-turvey. First thing Obama did when president is visit other countries and demean America, the country that voted him as president.

Then Obama proceeded to allow ISIS to grow and become a world wide exporter of terror, along with allowing Syria to explode into an international migrant crisis.

I cannot say with certainty that the Obama presidency cannot get any worse than it's been.

Trump will be a relief.

I can say with certainty that Trump being president will be one of the worst things to happen to America not only domestically, but globally. And it's no surprise that you're a support if you missed that my response was to your whole statement. "It's about time we have a president that likes America."

Sorry - Trump doesn't like America.

 

[rdowns]

You've gotten it topsy-turvey. First thing Obama did when president is visit other countries and demean America, the country that voted him as president.

Then Obama proceeded to allow ISIS to grow and become a world wide exporter of terror, along with allowing Syria to explode into an international migrant crisis.

I cannot say with certainty that the Obama presidency cannot get any worse than it's been.

Trump will be a relief.

Ah, the mythical Obama apology tour. I regret not making "tour" t-shirts to sell to the resident of the bubble.