Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Did you not read the list? Oh yeah, you did. And your response was "olol they said there's no proof but HILLARY IS HIDING THE PROOF". The closest he comes to telling the truth are spins hidden in half truths. Plus more long since disproven Benghazi stuff. Guess that horse hasn't been beaten to a bloody pulp quite yet.

Though does it really matter? You know Trump's lying, but you don't care. Nothing will change your mind on him by this point. Changing your mind is what Cucks do, amirite?

What exactly are you referring to that he was lying about?

Which item point specifically?

You already lost most of your credibility with your last attempt at "criticism" with that info graphic I posted.
 
Last edited:
You already lost most of your credibility with your last attempt at "criticism" with that info graphic I posted.

Oh, you mean that time when you plugged your ears and went "BLAHBLAHBLAH CAN'T HEAR YOU MY ****TY FACEBOOK ******** MEME IS SO TRUE BLAHBLAHBLAH"?

Yeah, you...uh, really had me wrangling in the grips of your logic there, dudeguy.

And why the hell do you need me to point things out that are hovering right in front of your damn face. The links have been provided you. Do your due diligence.

I mean you're responding to me, I assume that means you can read, right?

SO READ!
 
  • Like
Reactions: CalWizrd
Oh, you mean that time when you plugged your ears and went "BLAHBLAHBLAH CAN'T HEAR YOU MY ****TY FACEBOOK ******** MEME IS SO TRUE BLAHBLAHBLAH"?

Yeah, you...uh, really had me wrangling in the grips of your logic there, dudeguy.

And why the hell do you need me to point things out that are hovering right in front of your damn face. The links have been provided you. Do your due diligence.

I mean you're responding to me, I assume that means you can read, right?

SO READ!
I did, I read it and didn't see anything legitimate. Most of Trumps speech is 90% broad strokes and general macro statements that are common knowledge.

Almost every criticisms only citation was quoting "Tamara Keith"

Who the heck is Tamara Keith?? And what is on her hidden agenda?

So again, don't avoid the question:

What exactly are you referring to that he was lying about?

Which item point specifically?

You already lost most of your credibility with your last attempt at "criticism" with that info graphic I posted.
 
I did, I read it and didn't see anything legitimate. Most of Trumps speech is 90% broad strokes and general macro statements that are common knowledge.

Almost every criticisms only citation was quoting "Tamara Keith"

Who the heck is Tamara Keith?? And what is on her hidden agenda?

So again, don't avoid the question:

What exactly are you referring to that he was lying about?

Which item point specifically?

And why are you asking me when you have the evidence right in front of your face? Do you want me to block quote both of those pages, just so I can say that I'm responding directly to you? I could do that if you want me to. Or, you know, you can read the pages yourself.

Here's another one for you.

And I'll even quote a few for you...

Trump falsely claimed that U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens “was left helpless to die as Hillary Clinton soundly slept in her bed.” Two emails from Clinton show that she was awake after it was learned that Stevens had died in the attack on the diplomatic facility in Benghazi.

Trump claimed without any evidence that Clinton “wants to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to settle Middle Eastern refugees in the United States.” The numbers don’t add up. The total refugee budget was $1.67 billion in fiscal 2016, so it is unlikely that Clinton could add “hundreds of billions” to the budget for refugee assistance.

Trump overstated his case when he claimed the U.S. “trade deficit with China soared 40 percent during Hillary Clinton’s time as secretary of state.” It went up 17 percent, and we note that trade is under the purview of the Commerce Department, not the State Department.

Want more?

You already lost most of your credibility with your last attempt at "criticism" with that info graphic I posted.

Yeah, you already said that. But you want more salt in your wound? You said that the BJS study showing that 90% of all crime in the black community tends to be intraracial is from 2005, while your little "infographic" is from 2010.

Here's the kicker...

The BJS didn't post a crossracial crime study for 2010. Just a victimization survey.

So, once again, want more?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: thekev and CalWizrd
Trump already went phase 3 and already destroyed her in one foul swoop
It's "Fell Swoop", but where Trump's involved, "foul" is usually applicable.

Is there a transcript of this? It's always funnier to read, and listening or looking at him makes me want to vomit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MadeTheSwitch
Welp tours over for hillary.

Trump already went phase 3 and already destroyed her in one foul swoop


Checkmate liberals

Not that facts mean anything to you.

Trump Admits He Has No Evidence to Back Up Anti-Clinton Claims


Donald Trump told NBC’s Lester Holt he’d have to “report back” with evidence to bolster the inaccurate and unsupported claims he made about Hillary Clinton in a speech Wednesday.

In an interview that aired Thursday, Holt challenged Trump to back up the claim he made that Clinton’s private email server had been hacked. Trump responded, “I think I read that” and “I heard it,” but admitted that he would have to “report back” with the exact source. He finally concluded that “I don’t know if certainty. I — probably she was hacked.”
 
^Ok those attempt to debunk like five things, and vaguely as mere technicalities like "actually she woke up later.." Lol

Hardly lying, more like painting with broad strokes.

Ok let's say those were refuted or didn't have enough evidence to hold (which is not the same as not being true).

What about the other ~50 attacks he made about her? And also the greater character warping as a whole which is greater than the sum of its parts?

You covered like 5 out of 50. And the worst ones that did the most damage against Hillary weren't even debunked.

It still doesn't take away from the effectiveness of the speech sorry. It's not enough.

There also much more about Hillary that Trump didn't even bring up yet.
 
^Ok those attempt to debunk like five things, and vaguely as mere technicalities like "actually she woke up later.." Lol

Hardly lying, more like painting with broad strokes.

Ok let's say those were refuted or didn't have enough evidence to hold (which is not the same as not being true).

What about the other ~50 attacks he made about her? And also the greater character warping as a whole which is greater than the sum of its parts?

You covered like 5 out of 50. And the worst ones that did the most damage against Hillary weren't even debunked.

It still doesn't take away from the effectiveness of the speech sorry. It's not enough.

There also much more about Hillary that Trump didn't even bring up yet.
You're certainly an expert when it comes to painting with broad strokes. :rolleyes:
 
^Ok those attempt to debunk like five things, and vaguely as mere technicalities like "actually she woke up later.." Lol

Hardly lying, more like painting with broad strokes.

Ok let's say those were refuted or didn't have enough evidence to hold (which is not the same as not being true).

What about the other ~50 attacks he made about her? And also the greater character warping as a whole which is greater than the sum of its parts?

You covered like 5 out of 50. And the worst ones that did the most damage against Hillary weren't even debunked.

It still doesn't take away from the effectiveness of the speech sorry. It's not enough.

There also much more about Hillary that Trump didn't even bring up yet.


Open your eyes dude. Virtually everything he charged her with was an outright lie, some conspiracy theory or exaggerated. Here's a good fact check article.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/fact-check-trump-repeats-myth-benghazi/story?id=40045892
 
Last edited:
It is sad to read someone say 'fact checking is considered damage control'
how about just telling the truth? The truth no longer matters?

Clearly, way too many Americans (and other people in this country) are so warped as to be incapable of discerning truth from deception. Given a truth and a lie there will be plenty of people who aggressively defend a lie and rail against the truth. But then people argue that truth is all relative and an antiquated notion ... meanwhile the political frauds that capture the minds of the ignorant masses sell their country out, steal their money and never deliver anything but empty promises and misery. How long before people wake up? We have a murderous, greedy liar and also a patriot running for Pres but how many people are wise enough to discern the difference. Reality will tell you that most people around the work are not smarter than a tyrant.
[doublepost=1466833341][/doublepost]
So he lied! It doesn't matter. What does is that he lied with such style.

It's funny that, for all your priming and posturing about being NOT A CUCK, you're here proudly admitting how easily swayed you are.

Honestly are you on a left wing payroll to spew nonsensical vomit in a popular forum?
 
people wake up? We have a murderous, greedy liar and also a patriot running for Pres but how many people are wise enough to discern the difference. Reality will tell you that most people around the work are not smarter than a tyrant.
Who is the Patriot? Bernie?
 
Clearly, way too many Americans (and other people in this country) are so warped as to be incapable of discerning truth from deception. Given a truth and a lie there will be plenty of people who aggressively defend a lie and rail against the truth. But then people argue that truth is all relative and an antiquated notion ... meanwhile the political frauds that capture the minds of the ignorant masses sell their country out, steal their money and never deliver anything but empty promises and misery. How long before people wake up? We have a murderous, greedy liar and also a patriot running for Pres but how many people are wise enough to discern the difference. Reality will tell you that most people around the work are not smarter than a tyrant.

If your "patriot" comment is a reference to Trump, then your post is really ironic. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larry-K
One thing that both left and right wing people agree on is that this country USA is ****ed up!

Trump is the best and only possible chance we have to fix things and we need major changes. He's the only one aggressive and strong and bold enough to do something significant.

The man is a train wreck of epic proportions.

Most of you come across as racist and anti-white.

Thinking that Trump is a terrible choice for President, or a buffoon) is racist and anti-white? What on earth are you talking about?

Apparently Apple's commitment to diversity, inclusion, and respect for people ends when they don't like your politics... Good to know.... smh...

So, wait...if you favor diversity, inclusion, and respect for people, you should therefore support someone who wishes to ban over a billion people from entering the country and calls many nationalities all sorts of names and refers to them as criminals?

News flash: supporting inclusion and diversity does not mean you accept any and all opinions of others. I can't believe there are people who still think this.
[doublepost=1466897747][/doublepost]
Clearly, way too many Americans (and other people in this country) are so warped as to be incapable of discerning truth from deception. Given a truth and a lie there will be plenty of people who aggressively defend a lie and rail against the truth. But then people argue that truth is all relative and an antiquated notion ... meanwhile the political frauds that capture the minds of the ignorant masses sell their country out, steal their money and never deliver anything but empty promises and misery. How long before people wake up?

You're talking about Trump supporters, right? Because this certainly encapsulates pretty much all of them.
 
The Founding Fathers also said "Americans should not go abroad to slay dragons they do not understand in the name of spreading democracy" and they warned against "entangling alliances."
Yeah, and they said women couldn't vote, and many owned slaves, so don't paint them as being enlightened by today's standards.

Hillary is what used to pass for a moderate Republican, so is Bill. Their "Hawkishness" is no great surprise.

Find me some Republicans that don't like a good war, there's money to be made, and that's all that matters.
 
What exactly are you referring to that he was lying about?

Which item point specifically?

You already lost most of your credibility with your last attempt at "criticism" with that info graphic I posted.

For months, the Politifact Truth-o-Meter has registered Trump at the bottom on the truth scale. It is only "news" when someone catches Trump telling the truth. In fact, when it comes to not telling the truth, Trump makes even Ted Cruz look like a loser. But, honestly, do you care?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MadeTheSwitch
For months, the Politifact Truth-o-Meter has registered Trump at the bottom on the truth scale. It is only "news" when someone catches Trump telling the truth. In fact, when it comes to not telling the truth, Trump makes even Ted Cruz look like a loser. But, honestly, do you care?

No, I don't care about your silly "truth-o-meter" or any of that other childish and cheap nonsense. How does that make you feel?

----------

Also as far as Brexit... Who knew that the Brits aren't cucks deep down inside? lol good for them.

The same way everyone predicted Brexit wouldnt pass in the polls, but were flat wrong... Its the same way with Trump and people in the liberal media are telling themselves he isn't ahead in the polls.

But people in the brainwashed public and on Facebook keep calling Trump supporters racist so the "silent majority" keep it on the low low and then go in the voting booth with a vengeance lol.

You cant trust polls.

There is no precedent for what is happening this election so its hard to predict.

But if you look at all the sociological clues, (the most accurate elements of truth we have right now) it will be a landslide victory for Trump.
 
What exactly are you referring to that he was lying about?

Which item point specifically?

You already lost most of your credibility with your last attempt at "criticism" with that info graphic I posted.
85% of the crap out of his mouth is false. so the list would be far smaller to list the truths. but they are far between and had to find. the man fibbed 72 times in a hour how are we to keep up?
 
That statement is false.
well not according to the experts. but I know you don't want to accept it. You never accept anything that makes trump look less then godly. I have watched him contradict himself in the same sentence.

Donald Trump has been a real estate developer, entrepreneur and host of the NBC reality show, "The Apprentice." He is running for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016. Trump's statements were awarded PolitiFact's 2015 Lie of the Year.
Trump's statements by ruling
Click on the ruling to see all of Trump's statements for that ruling.

 
  • Like
Reactions: zmunkz
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.