I’ll use a series X instead. Vastly more powerful, useful, and cheaper.Apple TV is rapidly becoming the central entertainment hub in everyone's homes.
Faster and more capable Apple TV is what the whole world wants.
Without some cheaper way of getting AppleTV hardware into homes an Arcade subscription will continue to be niche compared to 'proper' consoles. The idea of using a subscription (Arcade in this case) to unlock functions would work just like software subscriptions - but I get it's so unlike Apple who want the money up front.
So all I'd say they can do is to make Apple Arcade an obvious bargain package that so happens to need adequate hardware to play the games on.
People won't complain too hard about buying phones so mobile class gaming is sorted but purchasing a 'full price' A14X console could be a stretch unless phone service providers get to sell the device as part of a contract.
Several rumors have indicated that Apple is working on a refreshed Apple TV, and Fudge, a leaker who goes by @choco_bit on Twitter, today shared some new information on what we can expect.
![]()
In a tweet, Fudge claims that Apple is preparing multiple new Apple TV set-top boxes, with a model featuring a variant of the A12 chip and one with an "A14X-like" chip. Fudge also mentions that a new controller is in the works, but it is unclear if the tweet is referencing an updated Siri Remote or a new, Apple-designed game controller.
Fudge mentions that Apple is working with developers to bring console-level games to Apple Arcade as means of bolstering the gaming service. Notably, the tweet points out that some games would only be able to be run on the A13 Bionic chip or later, so an upgraded Apple TV would be necessary to access the new Apple Arcade additions.
Signs of a new Apple TV with an A12 bionic chip were uncovered in the iOS 13.4 beta in February. In addition to an updated processor and a "T1125" codename, previous rumors have indicated that the refreshed Apple TV may feature higher capacity 64 and 128GB storage options.
Leaker Jon Prosser had previously suggested the new Apple TV will be equipped with an A12X Bionic chip, while another rumor had indicated it will use an A14 chip, the same chip in the fourth-generation iPad Air that's expected in the 2020 iPhones.
Apple debuted its A14 Bionic chip alongside the redesigned iPad Air at its September "Time Flies" event, and new benchmarks indicate that the chip offers significant performance improvements over the previous A13 Bionic.
Article Link: Apple Working on Apple TV Models With A12 and A14 Chips, New Controller, and More
It's no wonder Apple have difficulty understanding this when so many out there also seem to not grasp these concepts. It is you that are wrong, and continued posts on the matter from folk (who politely) put have no clue only serve to confuse the matters.Incorrect. You have the wrongful expectations and content because 23.976 is one of the standards, not 24 fps.
But I guess Apple are listing them because they're not standards, right?!1.18. VOD content SHOULD use a natural frame rate for the content. Any of the following frame rates: 23.976, 24, 25, 29.97, 30, 50, 59.94, and 60 fps are supported.
AMD Zen 2 is what. A year old? And RDNA 2 graphics haven’t even been released for PC yet. Old technology? Pardon, but, what the **** are you talking about?
I dont undertand why I need a apple tv anymore. I loved mine but nowadays with all the apps built in the TV...
What they need to do is make a real TV.
Given the style of games in Arcade (very light, simple, indie games that work will on a 5" touch screen or with the apple remote) Arcade will continue to be niche compared to 'proper' consoles until Apple does a major philosophical transformation on how they see games.
I'm sure there are a few decent games in the app store, but it is so filled with complete trash, it's nearly impossible to find anything worth trying anymore.
The final death knell for me was when I tried to get a racing game and after a lot of time looking for a game with controller support, I ended up with a gorgeous looking game where the entire gameplay was choosing if you go left or right at forks every 10 seconds or so. Seriously, wtf is that? who would even think that makes a playable game?
So will the next Apple TV be able to run macOS?
I always thought the ultra-compact Apple TV form-factor is what the Mac Mini should (eventually) become. An almost pocketable Mac.
Good point and you can already use an Xbox/PS4 controller with macs so should not be a hard taskIf they ever want to be taken seriously for games, they need their own controller.
I imagine it will need more storage and more ram for gaming. They are about to release os11 on arm. It would make the perfect mini desktop, IMO.
My Wife’s preferred controller on the AppleTV for standard use (not just for games) is the Xbox controller.Good point and you can already use an Xbox/PS4 controller with macs so should not be a hard task
I totally disagree. It's Apple TV, not Apple Gaming Box. They should offer a lower price device ($79-$99, competitive with Roku, Fire, etc.) for people interested in streaming only, and a souped up gaming version (which could be bundled with a game controller). Including a controller with every Apple TV sold would make the product unaffordable for those who don't care about gaming.Apple, if you want to compete with game consoles, include a controller with every Apple TV sold. A separately purchased controller will guarantee that Apple TV will never be popular in gaming.
With apps and app stores being built into most new TVs, if they want to keep selling these things long-term they should be looking for a new way to position the Apple TV box. (to be clear, i much prefer using Apple TV instead of the apps in my recent LG set, for lots of reasons, and I prefer an external box. But many people don’t care, and will just use what’s in the TV)I totally disagree. It's Apple TV, not Apple Gaming Box. They should offer a lower price device ($79-$99, competitive with Roku, Fire, etc.) for people interested in streaming only, and a souped up gaming version (which could be bundled with a game controller). Including a controller with every Apple TV sold would make the product unaffordable for those who don't care about gaming.
I also prefer an external box. I have a recent Samsung SmartTV that works OK, but it's very slow to switch from one app to the other and the UI isn't always intuitive. I recently bought a ROKU Premiere ($39) for another TV. It does everything I need much better than Samsung (except for the lack of an ethernet port). Apple needs a product that competes with it to keep users in its ecosystem. Otherwise, people like me will stick with the cheaper alternatives.With apps and app stores being built into most new TVs, if they want to keep selling these things long-term they should be looking for a new way to position the Apple TV box. (to be clear, i much prefer using Apple TV instead of the apps in my recent LG set, for lots of reasons, and I prefer an external box. But many people don’t care, and will just use what’s in the TV)
I admit I was (a little) mistaken. I wasn't aware the integer framerates were mainstream in broadcast, etc. My focus on the topic has been with NTSC. Anyway, circling back to your original gripe, the 29.97 is 30, 23.97 is 24, etc mentality could be part of the problem -- that is unless your research has turned up a document from Apple claiming the Apple TV doesn't support 24.00 fps. In other words, even those a part of distributing AV content are somewhat lacks on following the specifics. My point is, your problem still could be someone other than Apple not abiding by the standards.It's no wonder Apple have difficulty understanding this when so many out there also seem to not grasp these concepts. It is you that are wrong, and continued posts on the matter from folk (who politely) put have no clue only serve to confuse the matters.
1) That link isn't exactly a "standard".
2) You did read the words "tends to" and "usually" in the relevant sections, right?!
3) The integer (24.00 / 30 / 60) and non-integer (23.976, 29.97, 59.94) rates are ALL OVER the HDMI and video standards and content standards. Can't share them though as they are not public documents.
4) There is even at least one department at Apple that does understand the difference and have published their specification publicly. See here:
HLS authoring specifications :
But I guess Apple are listing them because they're not standards, right?!
Perhaps you could consider a bit more thorough research in future before posting so affirmatively in the negative.
Agree wholeheartedly. Airpod style controller would be great.Because switching between an ATV, iPhone, and iPad with a DS4 or XBox controller is a pain the ass. A service intended to work on all those devices should have a controller that seamlessly switches between all those devices.