The sad thing is that the original AppleTV allowed you to store movies on it, but now everything bust be streamed.Why can't we have one that has the built-in capability to store my MP4 videos, so I don't have to use my computer as a media server?
If you think apple is “too pc and inoffensive” you obviously have not been watching apple tv+.I agree! But more important then that, they also have to start making legit, REAL games. Apple is too PC and inoffensive to do that. At this moment they are making casual games for kids and stay at home moms and I feel, this audience don’t need anything more.
But you can stream from your local network, which works well enough for me.The sad thing is that the original AppleTV allowed you to store movies on it, but now everything bust be streamed.
As far as gaming is concerned, the Apple TV experiment failed big time, and it remained the hobby that it was during the Jobs days.
My opinion: get 4-5 killer games, those that anyone would love.
1. Sports (soccer, NFL, basketball)
2. Addictive FPS, CoD style
3. A proper racing game
4. Maybe the mind blowing RPG
They don’t make them but they do sell them and they are compatible with their console.
If all one is interested in is TV and movies, the days of spending $149 to $199 on an ATV box are over. A lot of those services are getting integrated into TV's themselves are can be well handled by a $50 streaming stick (assuming your TV doesn't have built-in services). Where the ATV will have to prove its value is in other services => a perfect example being gaming or the new Fitness+ service that Apple just announced.I think you’re right, they probably should do some type of basic streamer, as opposed to the streaming+gaming device they have. With the A12/A14 + RAM + storage, the BOM cost is too high to sell that box for $50.
But there’s no technical reason they couldn’t sell a $30-50 dongle-type streamer, the cheaper the better. I haven’t thought about the strategic implications of that though. It might be at odds with their grand plan. (Whatever that might be; I sure as hell haven’t figured out what it is.)
I agree! But more important then that, they also have to start making legit, REAL games. Apple is too PC and inoffensive to do that. At this moment they are making casual games for kids and stay at home moms and I feel, this audience don’t need anything more.
They will never beat Nintendo in terms of game experience.
Apple needs a FireTV Stick competitor. Even if its not 30 USD range. Then a Chromecast Google TV competitor for 50USD.
Just something cheap to bring apple TV to a wider audience .
a thinner controller
The sad thing is that the original AppleTV allowed you to store movies on it, but now everything bust be streamed.
I pack my Apple TV (1080p smaller version) when going on vacation or away for more than a day. Then I have my normal home setup wherever I go that has either an ethernet or WIFI. Fits perfectly in a ziploc bag with it's cables.I’d love that when I travel.
OR PLEX.VLC is your friend
Audience for video is much bigger than the audience for video games.
They‘re working on it, though.
In 2018, global box office and home video revenue was 96.8 billion.Maybe literally, but isn't it true that the video game industry is more profitable than any other media industry now? Meaning that even though the audience is smaller, overall consumers spend more?
Just Googled and found this, which I think cites the figures I was thinking of: https://www.ejinsight.com/eji/artic...stry-silently-taking-over-entertainment-world
Nintendo has had enormous success without making mature-rated games. Not everybody wants to play those.
In 2018, global box office and home video revenue was 96.8 billion.
Video game revenue in 2018 was 35 billion.
a thinner controller
I don’t have a smart tv so I would also use the other apps on the Apple TV. I would imagine if you have one, you only buy this for the arcade?