I don't understand the point of this story. This is the kind of thing that usually posts on Friday afternoon, to keep the comments section busy all weekend. What is it doing on a Tuesday?
Maybe the weekend rumor is that Apple had decided to go ahead and eject the battery and camera too, both even more "antiquated" technologies than 3.5mm. Certainly the usual suspects would spin why those moves would be great for us too (just as soon as they started believing Apple was probably going to do it), with every bit of the passion/spin/lying/etc going into trying to rationalize getting rid of 3.5mm...
"
Key to waterproof": Apparently water only wants to enter small round holes, not the larger, rectangular hole just millimeters away? And, of course, competitors have rolled out waterproof devices with 3.5mm. Can Apple not do what competitors can do?
"
Digital is better": Yet our ears can only hear analog. Preserving a digital stream a few more mm should have little to no net gain for anyone. We're not measuring that preservation in meters here- just millimeters.
"
DAC will be better": So why not put a better DAC
INSIDE the phone... where one has to be anyway... so it can still work as a phone? And cheap adapters are going to have cheap DACs, so unless one pays up for their new iPhone "tail", there's no guarantee that the DAC outside will actually be superior to the DAC inside.
"
wireless* is the future": Yet in the present, wireless typically delivers lower-quality sound, is another thing to charge, has lag problems when watching video and is much less accessible when you need to connect to much other tech where 3.5mm is readily usable now.
"
lightning* is better": No, lightning is just a connector... and it's a proprietary one that will never be able to become as ubiquitous as 3.5mm or even bluetooth due to it's proprietary hold by a single company who will not even stick with it very long themselves because it will soon clash with "thinner" (tip up your own iDevice and look as the current state of "thin" vs. the size of the jack... then think about the near-term future). And do we really want precious space on the edge of future Macs to be taken by a Lightning jack for headphone use instead of- say- another USB3 port?
*both bluetooth and lightning jack options are ALREADY available for anyone who believes anything they actually spin about the superiority of either option. Those who believe what they are spinning can already embrace the better option. Killing 3.5mm is not an obstacle for anyone wanting to go either way now... or even in 2015.
"
All you need is a small adapter": This one can be applied to a decision to eject the battery too... then the camera... etc. Apple could sell us an empty box for $1000 and then we could buy various "adapters" (sold separately of course) to attach together to get the features that used to come INSIDE a single box. Selling an empty box would be very, very profitable for Apple and AAPL... and apparently a chunk of us consumers prioritize such thinking over even what's good for us.
And my favorite...
"
Apple must force changes for the better... like dropping floppy discs, embracing USB, etc" implying that consumers just can't embrace obviously superior on our own (apparently we're all too ignorant- cue the Henry Ford quote about faster horses), while ignoring that the obvious successors to technologies like floppy discs were already available, obviously superior and NOT proprietary.
Again and again in every one of these threads, the question keeps being asked:
what's in this change for us consumers? It's obvious what "forcing" proprietary standards does for the corporation and AAPL. But what do we gain here? Could we get a no-spin, quality answer to that question? And why does 3.5mm have to go to deliver whatever answer is spun?