lol ... i'm doing the analysis the IDC should have. maybe i should become an analyst on the side.
lol ... i'm doing the analysis the IDC should have. maybe i should become an analyst on the side.
So, you're telling me that 1 in every 5 households over 7.5k USD/year income is going to buy a tablet in 2011?!?!?!?
hahahahahaha ... no way.
You're missing the point.
There are only 1.2 billion people on the planet that live in a household with more than 7500 USD in income. Assume that 3.5 people live in a household ... that makes roughly 1.2B/3.5 = roughly 350 million households that have an income of greater than 7500 USD / year.
I am assuming that households below 7500USD/yr would not spend roughly one month of their income on a tablet.
50M tablets / 350M households = 1 / 7 or roughly 14.3%. If you include last years tablets ... it's roughly 20% of households with a tablet.
1 out of 5 households ... I don't believe it.
I also understand the limitation of my analysis ... households can have more than a single tablet ... I guess that I have a little, actually a tiny, hope that the human race hasn't descended that much into consumerism yet!
The reason I don't believe it is because the tablet still doesn't have a basic function. It's not a utility ... it doesn't replace a phone/TV/kitchen appliance. I just don't think it will reach 20% saturation unless the definition of tablet changes to merge with a phone based item.
It still seems like segway ...great technology with no application. It does however have apple behind it and they do produce some products that are essential (phones, PCs, laptops) that could lure customers in.
Just my .02
You are missing another limitation of your analysis. Businesses are also buying iPads.
You are missing another limitation of your analysis. Businesses are also buying iPads.
Well... more figures for you to chew on. Stop assuming each one of these households only have ONE. Also, stop assuming that schools and businesses aren't buying these. iPad is huge in a number of areas.Only 1.2B people live in households that have more than a $7.5k yearly income (consumer class of people).
Selling, not only shipping, 50M iPads this year plus the 7M from last year would mean the 57M / 1.2B or roughly 5% of people in these households would have one ... or 1 in every 20.
I just don't buy it ... at all.
edit: as an extension, if one considers 3.5 ppl / household that would be 1.2B / 3.5 ppl = 340M households. Therefore, 57M / 340M household or roughly 20% of households would have an iPad ... I think that's EXTREMELY optimistic.
Please do your own research. This has been widely reported. Some Universities have begun to hand out iPads to all first-time students. Many businesses are purchasing large orders of iPads. Best Buy alone was recently reported to be starting a program. Just watch CNN and count them.do you have any numbers for this? i haven't seen a single business in Germany with an iPad, nor anyone running iPhones in house (enterprise). I actually see more BB and Android usage with all the corporations. Granted, I haven't lived in the states in a few years, maybe things have changed.
goes to show $teve Job$' lies eventually catch up.
do you have any numbers for this? i haven't seen a single business in Germany with an iPad, nor anyone running iPhones in house (enterprise). I actually see more BB and Android usage with all the corporations. Granted, I haven't lived in the states in a few years, maybe things have changed.
Just wondering when people start talking about Apple abusing it's position in the market. I guess the question is what is the percentage required?
65% of Fortune 100 companies using iPad
https://www.macrumors.com/2010/10/1...n-on-20-34-billion-revenue-best-quarter-ever/
Your calculations are fatally flawed because you completely ignore enterprise customers as well as education and government.Only 1.2B people live in households that have more than a $7.5k yearly income (consumer class of people).
Selling, not only shipping, 50M iPads this year plus the 7M from last year would mean the 57M / 1.2B or roughly 5% of people in these households would have one ... or 1 in every 20.
I just don't buy it ... at all.
edit: as an extension, if one considers 3.5 ppl / household that would be 1.2B / 3.5 ppl = 340M households. Therefore, 57M / 340M household or roughly 20% of households would have an iPad ... I think that's EXTREMELY optimistic.
define "use."
I wish tablets interested me. The only new tech things I'm interested in getting right now are the viliv n5 and the superpad from amazon someone posted here.
the reality is that android has already eaten into apple's share. just like the iphone, their strength is the competition from within android to keep up to date and the options available to the consumer, its a concept apple doesn't readily subscribe. The result in the phone space is apple was surpassed in market share already and doesn't look to be slowing down. consumers want options, apple does not give that too themShipments being the crucial word here.
Market share of "shipments". Not sales. Shipments. This means absolutely nothing.
Many of these companies are hedging their bets that their iterations will sell like Apple's but if we go buy Samsung's coy comments on their actual sales I'd hazard a guess there's a lot of them sitting around unsold.
so why are you even here then? do you own any Macs? or any apple products? According to your signature thats a negative...
Only 1.2B people live in households that have more than a $7.5k yearly income (consumer class of people).
Selling, not only shipping, 50M iPads this year plus the 7M from last year would mean the 57M / 1.2B or roughly 5% of people in these households would have one ... or 1 in every 20.
I just don't buy it ... at all.
edit: as an extension, if one considers 3.5 ppl / household that would be 1.2B / 3.5 ppl = 340M households. Therefore, 57M / 340M household or roughly 20% of households would have an iPad ... I think that's EXTREMELY optimistic.
I've seen entire families with iPads heading out on vacation.
A monopoly is only illegal if you abuse it.