Ready for the flood of "not me" posts from people that barely read the title...
~ 81% of Americans own a smartphone, this technology CAN save lives. Apple & Google have done an excellent job explaining HOW this is done without compromising your privacy. If you own a smartphone, but don't trust the explanation around how this works, why would you trust that your phone isn't already compromising your privacy & security?
You don’t care that the vice president refused to wear a mask while visiting a hospital with COVID19 patients while everybody else in the hospital has to wear a mask (and did so) because he thinks rules don’t apply to him and wearing a mask would make him look weak?I don’t know/care what Pence did.
You can be sick (and more importantly, infectious) while being asymptomatic. This is a fact. You can have it and not know, then pass it to all those around you. It's not just you, but them, you should factor into your decision. You can also turn off notifications. if the app designers build it properly, the info should still be in the app if you want it without needing the push notification.I will not have my phone pinging me just because someone else has gotten sick. If I get sick, I’ll take appropriate measures. But I’m not walking around waiting to get pinged.
If you are tested positive but either asymptomatic, or the symptoms are not severe, they send you home for quarantining — you don't get an ankle bracelet or anything. And they definitely don't make you download an app and broadcast the result.Furthermore, unless I end up in hospital from symptoms, I won’t be pursuing a COVID test because of how haphazardly it’s assumed I should suddenly be tracked.
That's a fair question with a simple answer — it is much harder to transmit HIV/AIDS than it is Covid-19. Covid-19 can be contracted at a distance with no physical interaction and HIV/AIDS cannot. Covid-19 can live without a host on surfaces for up to 3 days and HIV/AIDS cannot. Plus, depending on if you have HIV or AIDS, some are HIV+ with an undetectable viral load, meaning they can't communicate the disease to others even with unprotected sex. So the reality is that while HIV/AIDS is much more dangerous in general, it is leagues harder to transmit the virus than it is to transmit COVID-19. Also, it isn't necessarily a death sentence anymore, ask Magic Johnson and a whole host of others who have lived relatively healthy lives (bodies haven't deteriorated, can fight off general infections) for decades. Not that anyone shouldn't still be cautious when intimate with someone who is HIV+.In the other thread I used the example of HIV/AIDS. That’s something that “should” have contact tracing, yet it does not. So far we can statistically say that people recover from COVID. Not so with HIV, which is a death sentence* on maintenance. So I find this COVID tracking supremely suspicious.
The difference here is that people who acquire Covid-19 don't stay infected — it either runs its course or you die. The point of contact tracing is to measure the spread and detect if a second wave is coming because you can transmit without symptoms. Contact tracing for HIV/AIDS is less effective because you cannot contract it just by standing beside someone.If you’ve got no problem with this, then get ahead of the curve you’re flattening and imagine a future where you’re pinged for passing a stranger with COVID … then passing one with HIV … then passing one with Herpes … etc. It’s all inappropriate.
Your specific health is not being broadcast at all — an anonymous identifier is and no one will be able to discern who it is unless you only interact with one person, at which point you should already know. Also — as far as Pings go — if you are social distancing you will get few if any at all and you always have to option to turn the notifications off.The violation of privacy is not with the data (which I applaud Apple for handling well), but with the idea of allowing our health to be broadcast and allowing our personal devices invaded with pings from those who willy-nilly broadcast their health out of some noble sense of saving the world.
With all due respect that makes no sense. If you test positive, you should immediately be self-quarantining (so you shouldn't be running into them at all). This is about people who don't know they have it, you come in contact with them, then a few days afterwards they show symptoms, get tested and it comes back positive. If you contracted it but didn't know until you showed signs, why should I sue you, if you only find out when you showed symptoms days later?It would honestly make more sense to have no privacy and share everyone’s contact info. That way if you, Person Who Supports Tracking, pass me and get me sick, then I can sue your insurance to cover my healthcare to get sick. How does that sound? Just like with a car accident.
Here we absolutely agree.After all, contacting COVID and ending up in hospital in the US is more likely a financial death sentence than an actual death sentence. Statistically speaking, anyway.
The idea that one has to rely on the actions of others to stay safe goes so against the grain of supporters of individualism.The point is not that it protects you by stopping you getting infected, but that it stops you potentially spreading the virus to friends, family, and colleagues, as well as strangers around you.
If a lot of people use the app, then it will help protect you, because people who have come into contact with infected people won't be out in public.
That would actually scare me more — at least here the government doesn't have the data, just access to the API. I am not a Tin-foil Hat wearer, but I would much rather a third-party that can be held accountable for misuse than a government that can pass laws after the fact and say what they have acquired is fair use to continue to leverage.UK NHSX app here... oh, we're using something else, so this story is already entirely irrelevant to us here.
Oh well, never mind, hey!![]()
I consider myself an individualist in many respects, but I also base decisions on logic and rationality. No matter how much of an individualist you are, this API simply does not infringe on individual liberty, and to argue it does is to willfully ignore the way the technology actually works. Nobody is tracking you, nobody is monitoring you, nobody is restricting you from doing anything or compelling you to do anything.The idea that one has to rely on the actions of others to stay safe goes so against the grain of supporters of individualist.
No, but you can't get infected if you are not exposed (you aren't going to spontaneously develop the virus), so knowing if you are exposed will tell you if you may have been infected or not. What you are saying is akin to saying being nominated is not the same as winning an award — obviously — but you should want to know because you don't want this award.Here’s a thought: exposure is NOT the same thing as infection.
Once again, it’s not a data/privacy issue, it’s an ideological/societal one.
I will not have my phone pinging me just because someone else has gotten sick. If I get sick, I’ll take appropriate measures. But I’m not walking around waiting to get pinged. In high density areas like a city, you’ll be at risk for getting more pings about COVID than texts from friends and colleagues.
To me, this is simply obnoxious; but imagine the people who already can’t handle anxiety or mainstream fear paranoia, how will they do with being pinged about their potential acute death sentence multiple times a day?
Furthermore, unless I end up in hospital from symptoms, I won’t be pursuing a COVID test because of how haphazardly it’s assumed I should suddenly be tracked. That’s a big NO. I was not opposed to getting tested until seeing how a positive test suddenly comes with all of these assumptions and implied actions to take next.
All of this is a red flag setting precedent for worse things. In the other thread I used the example of HIV/AIDS. That’s something that “should” have contact tracing, yet it does not. So far we can statistically say that people recover from COVID. Not so with HIV, which is a death sentence* on maintenance. So I find this COVID tracking supremely suspicious.
If you’ve got no problem with this, then get ahead of the curve you’re flattening and imagine a future where you’re pinged for passing a stranger with COVID … then passing one with HIV … then passing one with Herpes … etc. It’s all inappropriate.
The violation of privacy is not with the data (which I applaud Apple for handling well), but with the idea of allowing our health to be broadcast and allowing our personal devices invaded with pings from those who willy-nilly broadcast their health out of some noble sense of saving the world.
It would honestly make more sense to have no privacy and share everyone’s contact info. That way if you, Person Who Supports Tracking, pass me and get me sick, then I can sue your insurance to cover my healthcare to get sick. How does that sound? Just like with a car accident.
After all, contacting COVID and ending up in hospital in the US is more likely a financial death sentence than an actual death sentence. Statistically speaking, anyway.
EDIT: Corrected typo of not including the word “sentence.”
Actually we don't know that. I suspect the switch will turn of the beacons, if only to save battery life. In any case this will be easy to verify.You need to read the verbiage CAREFULLY. This has been discussed in other threads. The only thing the switch does is disable notifications. It does not disable the beacons with your device identifiers. There is no known way of disabling that.
Not so with HIV, which is a death sentence* on maintenance.
One would hope they'd order delivery instead.While Person 1 is still infected (and contagious) he HAS to still go out to the store to get food.
It is not "real time" for two reasons:When he's waiting in line, (next to Person 1) will Person 1 get an ALARM immediately that there's a person nearby who is a leper?
• Will it be real time? Or always old news with a time lag?
If it's REAL TIME (Alert! Alert! Infected Person Nearby) are hoards of people (using the app) going to spill out of doorways in panic the moment the Leper enters the store?
If yes - not good.
If no - contact tracing won't protect you
It's not really realtime, that's not how it works because...While Person 1 is still infected (and contagious) he HAS to still go out to the store to get food. When he's waiting in line, (next to Person 1) will Person 1 get an ALARM immediately that there's a person nearby who is a leper?
That means who you have been in contact with is only on your phone, anonymously, which leads me to...Their phones know they've been in contact and store that information on the device itself, transmitting it nowhere else.
Meaning the only way you get a ping in realtime is because it is a person you have already had contact with, and you are running into them again. if I have been exposed to the same person twice who tested positive — as rare as that could be — I'd be running to get tested and I'd be pissed that person if endangering others so calously if they knew (got tested) and still went out. Lots of places deliver.Later that day, Eric's health app downloads a list of all recent beacons from people that have contracted COVID-19.
Wouldn't happen unless you have run into them previously to even be on your radar.If it's REAL TIME (Alert! Alert! Infected Person Nearby) are hoards of people (using the app) going to spill out of doorways in panic the moment the Leper enters the store?
It's not about protection — the only way to protect yourself it to social distance, self-isolate, bulk up your immune system with Vitamin B, and try to wear a mask if you know you will run into the public. This is about understanding how the infection is moving, helping the health system focus only on the sever cases and not be inundated with testing of those who haven't been exposed.If yes - not good.
If no - contact tracing won't protect you
No, it doesn't have identifiers — that's the whole point.You need to read the verbiage CAREFULLY. This has been discussed in other threads. The only thing the switch does is disable notifications. It does not disable the beacons with your device identifiers. There is no known way of disabling that.
You need to read the verbiage CAREFULLY.Ryan's Android phone has a random identifier number, 12486, which is unique to Ryan's phone (and which changes every 15 minutes)
Then for the sake of everyone else, stay home until the vaccine is perfected - we don't want you endangering other people's lives.I already stayed at home for 2 months, thanks Italy. Don't need any more nanny state or liberal companies trashing my privacy and rights.
Yes I read the specs. Yes I read the full article. No, no way I will willingly give up God given rights.
OK, seriously, it's right there.Oh good, a fake opt out button that is just a placebo not connected to the OS, except maybe to report you to the authorities for trying to protect your privacy. How quickly the Totalitarian yoke has been put around our necks.
There is a toggle for the system, and then a toggle for the app you will have downloaded of your own volition. This is important — That top toggle is for the system, whichmeans it's still there if you haven't installed an app. The app gives you the push notifications (if you have been exposed to someone infected) not the system. You are conflating the two becasue of the name "Exposure Notification" they are using for their contact tracing system.Disabling Exposure Notification
You can disable Exposure Notification entirely by following the steps in our how to, and there will also be options to toggle off the feature on a per-app basis if multiple apps that use the API are installed. Apps that you have installed that use the API will be listed in the Privacy settings on your iPhone.
<img src="/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.macrumors.com%2Farticle-new%2F2020%2F04%2Fexposurenotificationappsinstalled.jpg&hash=e2b931323ea6693ad38c7d73f9d42b74" data-url="https://images.macrumors.com/article-new/2020/04/exposurenotificationappsinstalled.jpg" class="bbImage" data-zoom-target="1" style="" />![]()
Image via Guilherme Rambo
So... If you don't want to be tracked, don't install the app, don't go to the doctor and —upon getting a positive test — don't follow the steps to send out notifications.Your phone keeps a list of these identifiers on it, and this list remains on your device - it is not uploaded anywhere. The exception is if you're diagnosed with COVID-19 and then follow the steps to send out notifications to the smartphones that have been in contact with yours.
WHAT HEALTH DATA?AMEN. It won’t be long before the “iCloud Data Breach Reveals Health Data of Potentially Millions With COVID-19 Diagnoses” headline.