Sounds like damage control from Apple
The bottom line is TouchID wasn't broken, and they chose to replace it with something that is not is good in way more scenarios than the ones where it is better.
Well, call it mutual respect if you want.That's not damage control at all. That's called mutual respect.
I still don't see any real benefit over Touch ID.
They've replaced it with something that's more convenient in some and less convenient in other ways, works slower and has more potential of someone else unlocking it against your will.
Not saying Face ID sucks, but shouldn't the new thing be significantly better and not just different and for many people even worse?
Well, call it mutual respect if you want.
But it is actually just good damage control in the form of good PR.
Unless you sleep with your eyes open, no it can't be used when sleeping. With regards to cops they would have to force your eyes open and force you to look at it. You really worried about that situation?So then it can easily be used while sleeping. It can easily be used by cops.
Yep. I like Craig.Pretty awesome to see Craig reply to these emails!
Just protecting our constitutional rights against increasingly intrusive searches by government agents, such as these:Why are so many people concerned about handing their phone to a cop? Wtf are some of you up to?
So then it can easily be used while sleeping. It can easily be used by cops.
They didn't have to.But everyone on here told me Apple didn't even bother thinking about sunglasses when developing FaceID?
I've personally been robbed at knife point two times, successfully, that is. The thieves got away with my phone and wallet. Both of those guys at least were so on edge during the whole shebang that I would think pointing the phone at my face or trying to wrestle one of my fingers for a chance at opening the phone were quite literally the last thing on their minds.
So that scenario really doesn't worry my in the least.
So then it can easily be used while sleeping. It can easily be used by cops.
Because they assume a certain level of intelligence in the audience and do not think every crazy person on the internet thought of something that has been overlooked by Apple's very well-paid engineers.Why dont they mention that stuff at the keynote to avoid crique in the first place? Such details are what we want to hear!
Damage control for what? Outside of sites like this I don’t see anyone talking about it.Well, call it mutual respect if you want.
But it is actually just good damage control in the form of good PR.
I'd say it lowers the barriers considerably, since they don't even need to touch you to unlock your phone with Face ID.If that's a legitimate fear for you then you need to disable Face ID and use just the passcode. In the US courts can legally force you to use your finger to unlock your phone but cannot force you to provide your passcode. This is no different.