Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
There’s a lot more screen to power off that 5500 mAh battery. Just because the battery size is the largest doesn’t mean actual usage will see any improvement. Likely just enough capacity to continue the “all day battery life” claim they routinely use.
Came here to comment the same. Not sure how a marginally larger battery is going to exceed current iPhone battery life when the Fold is powering an extra 2 screens. Wouldn’t we expect almost double the battery capacity?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Viddrumr32
Count me into the minority of people to prefer Touch ID as apposed to Face ID. I actually think it is more convenient and more reliable over Face ID. Face ID has been too busy recently for my taste. Work the bugs out of Face ID first and then I'm listening.
Sorry I really don't even know how to respond to that. I've been using Face ID every day for 9 years, and also have an iPad Air sitting here that has Side Button Touch ID.

There is no comparison between the two.
 
I mean that just couldn't be more untrue. If you care that much about this form factor that you're willing to accept a much more worse user experience 20-30 times a day every day, then good for you. But it just isn't so.

Forget the fact that Face ID is several orders of magnitude more secure than Touch ID, the convenience factor is unmatched. You look at the thing, and it unlocks. You're not having to deliberately do anything unnatural. Side Button Touch ID however is bad. Very bad. It is incredibly awkward to do, and requires a deliberate AND awkward gesture every single you want to use it. It is bad enough on the iPad Air, I can't imagine it dozens of times per day on iPhone. Making excuses for it is not necessary. It really is just bad.

But it isn’t worse

Face ID is very good but completely useless if it’s not in your hand. On a desk? Awful. On the sofa? Awful.

Touch ID will be far superior no matter if the phone is in your hands or not

You’re basing your theory here on the Touch ID on iPads. It don’t be like on iPads. It will be a side finger print scanner it will be far easier to use that any iPad with it on
 
Count me into the minority of people to prefer Touch ID as apposed to Face ID. I actually think it is more convenient and more reliable over Face ID. Face ID has been too busy recently for my taste. Work the bugs out of Face ID first and then I'm listening.
Came here to say exactly this. I’d be much more likely to buy any iPhone that brings back Touch ID. I am really not a fan of the “hold the phone in front of face and stare at it” move you have to do with Face ID. Touch ID was really more convenient where it could be facing any direction and pick up your fingerprint.

It also just seemed to work a lot better. Seems like even after all these years of Face ID it misses my face a lot and I end up typing my passcode. And there are certain pairs of sunglasses I own that just break it completely. Touch ID always worked flawlessly and instantly.
 
isnt it just an ipad mini with a hinge at presumably 5x the cost?

sus-suspicious-wendy-williams.gif
 
Battery capacity is only one determinant of battery life - power consumption is the other, and the article does not mention either the power requirements of the device or the estimated battery life.

I any case, I would like to see increased battery life for all of Apple's mobile devices, hopefully in a less polluting way. We'll see.
 
Why? The work they did on the iPhone Air was so that thing could be made and not weigh as much as 2 Pro Maxes.

Because much of the weight in an iPhone is due to the battery and Apple is claiming unrivaled battery life in the foldable. The battery is claimed to be 5,500 mAh in size which is large and much heavier than the battery in the Air.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Farquar
the foldable's battery could be over 5,500 mAh in size, which would make it the largest capacity of any current or previous iPhone. […] As a result, any foldable smartphone from Apple with a battery over 5,500 mAh in size would be class-leading.
Unrivaled? Class-leading? The Oppo foldable from last year has a 5600 mAh battery.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JohnWick1954
It makes sense Apple prioritizes the large battery power as the unfolding screen with everything in it will consume a lot of power. It is good to hear this!! If this rumor materializes, the iFold users will definitely appreciate Apple and the product!
 
Sorry I really don't even know how to respond to that. I've been using Face ID every day for 9 years, and also have an iPad Air sitting here that has Side Button Touch ID.

There is no comparison between the two.

You're making the mistake of believing your own subjective opinions of FaceID are objective ones. Other people can and will have different opinions. People use their devices differently, and FaceID and TouchID do perform differently for different people. People will have different grievances with each on them.

Nonetheless, FaceID presents 3 challenges for a folding phone, so it makes sense Apple may not be including it:

1. Two screens means two FaceID modules. One for the inner screen and one of the outer screen.

2. Thickness. The Face ID module is housed in the camera plateau of other iPhones. No such bump out is possible on the outer screen of a folding phone, since when folded, it sits on top of the inner screen.

3. Battery life. Both of the above translate to much less space available for batteries.

There are ways to make FaceID work on a foldable. The easiest method being to add a non-folding portion on the top or side of the phone to hold faceID and cameras that are usable with the phone open or closed, but that comes with it's own set of trade-offs. Regardless of your feelings on the matter, there are certain physical realities that can help explain why Apple may be taking this route.
 
Sorry I really don't even know how to respond to that. I've been using Face ID every day for 9 years, and also have an iPad Air sitting here that has Side Button Touch ID.

There is no comparison between the two.
Unfortunately, side button Touch ID is worse than home button Touch ID is.

The general benefit of Touch ID is that by the time the phone is in front of your face, it is already unlocked, while Face ID takes an extra half second or second.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
They’re running multiple screens so this just doesn’t add up. I’m sure the Apple fan boys are going off the deep end in ecstasy. I want to see a battery that size in a standard iPhone Pro, then we can talk about pro level battery life.
 
  • Disagree
  • Haha
Reactions: iPAU and marte91
A big battery is nice. However with multiple screens to be powered, the end result might be that it has battery life similar to the Pro Max. Looking forward to seeing the device though I don’t think I will get one if it is going to lack the telephoto lens.
FaceID on the exterior display to unlock the device and then when unfolded it still unlocked. If the device is unfolded and locked then to unlock, use TouchID.

TouchID can be used both in the exterior display and interior to unlock while FaceID to unlock the exterior display only then unfold. This device may have both security measures which is what people have been drooling about for ages.
 
isnt it just an ipad mini with a hinge at presumably 5x the cost?

sus-suspicious-wendy-williams.gif
Most people have "interesting" logic:

iFlop for 2000$✅
Regular iPhone + iPad Air for ~1300$❌

Maybe they need "all in one device" though... however I won't understand what's the point since having two devices is much more comfortable than one and preserves battery of both: twice less charge cycles, battery alive for many more years
 
Unrivaled battery size is not necessarily unrivaled battery life. And it is still quite small compared to all the SiC phones coming out the last couple years. Here’s hoping they get back to optimizing iOS 27 for battery life, because iOS 26 was a big step backwards for battery life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marte91
So are we expecting this to have feature parity with the Pro lineup - effectively making it the “best” choice with no compromises? Or are we expecting it to be an iPhone Air-type experience?

Like - a single camera? No Apple LOG? Possibly a single speaker?

Somehow I think it’ll be a ‘lifestyle’ choice and I expect the pro lineup will stick around with better features for power users.
 
You're making the mistake of believing your own subjective opinions of FaceID are objective ones. Other people can and will have different opinions. People use their devices differently, and FaceID and TouchID do perform differently for different people. People will have different grievances with each on them.

Nonetheless, FaceID presents 3 challenges for a folding phone, so it makes sense Apple may not be including it:

1. Two screens means two FaceID modules. One for the inner screen and one of the outer screen.

2. Thickness. The Face ID module is housed in the camera plateau of other iPhones. No such bump out is possible on the outer screen of a folding phone, since when folded, it sits on top of the inner screen.

3. Battery life. Both of the above translate to much less space available for batteries.

There are ways to make FaceID work on a foldable. The easiest method being to add a non-folding portion on the top or side of the phone to hold faceID and cameras that are usable with the phone open or closed, but that comes with it's own set of trade-offs. Regardless of your feelings on the matter, there are certain physical realities that can help explain why Apple may be taking this route.
I'm not making any assumptions. Looking at your phone to unlock it is objectively better and superior than fumbling to rest your finger on the side of the device in a certain way. Full stop. This is not up for debate. Just because the minority of people's anecdotal experiences with either have some variation does not mean anything.

Some people have rare poor experiences with Face ID and write off the entire thing as a result. Others want the foldable and are willing to make weak excuses for its trade offs.

That said, yes the physical realities you mention present challenges. The decision is whether those challenges should stop the production of the product or not. I believe that with someone other than late-stage Tim Cook at the helm, they would have decided differently.
 
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: iPAU and marte91
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.