Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
With all of Apple’s drip feeding and bean counting, I’ll believe it when I see it. It’s their first foldable - that’ll be enough for the marketing team in this round.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zoga
A longer battery life is literally all I want in my devices. Forget under-screen face ID, dumb AI integrations, or a folding phone. Let me charge the damn thing once a week, and then we'll talk!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TVreporter
I don't know...battery life is pretty impressive, and is limited by physical size. Only a lower power display technology is going to have a dramatic improvement to battery. Durability though is a joke, for a handheld product. It is clear that these are design to look good in marketing photos, but be used in case.
Not exactly, a silicon carbon battery will also have a big effect on battery life.
 
A longer battery life is literally all I want in my devices. Forget under-screen face ID, dumb AI integrations, or a folding phone. Let me charge the damn thing once a week, and then we'll talk!
With all the super convenient charging options we have now, why do you feel the need for a device that lasts so obscenely long between charges? If I can get an entire day out of a mobile device, with any type of usage, I'm happy.
 
I would have to pickup that phone with touchid (top, side or whatever) in a particular way to unlock it right away, that is awkward enough as I certainly don't have to have my hands/fingers on certain places on a phone with faceid.
Sometimes I pick up my phone with my left hand, sometimes with the right hand, sometimes its face up, sometimes face down.
But as I said, whatever ...
You also have to pick up your phone for Face ID though. It doesn’t work if the phone is angled away.

Now think about using Apple Pay. With Face ID you have to double tap the side button, hold up the phone to your face, wait ~1 second for it to scan you, then finally you are ready to pay.

With Touch ID, by the time you have double tapped the side button it has already scanned your finger, so you just tap and go. It’s just way more convenient.

Also FYI you can add fingers from both hands to work with Touch ID so it doesn’t matter which hand you pick it up with.
 
You also have to pick up your phone for Face ID though. It doesn’t work if the phone is angled away.

Now think about using Apple Pay. With Face ID you have to double tap the side button, hold up the phone to your face, wait ~1 second for it to scan you, then finally you are ready to pay.

With Touch ID, by the time you have double tapped the side button it has already scanned your finger, so you just tap and go. It’s just way more convenient.

Also FYI you can add fingers from both hands to work with Touch ID so it doesn’t matter which hand you pick it up with.
So for you touchid is more convenient and superior to faceid, that’s fine.
For me, touchid is far less reliable than faceid, simple as that.
And as for Apple Pay, my Apple Watch is far superior to using the phone…
 
Well, duh. That's like saying an iPad has unrivaled battery capacity compared to iPhone. Yeah, it does, because it has more space to house it, which is fortunate, because has a much bigger screen to power (the primary draw on battery).

Very likely the fold will have competitive battery life with the Pro Max model. Not anything dramatically greater. Though it's a given that it will last longer when only using it folded.

Still though...if true that this product does not have Face ID...I don't know how anyone is going to get past that. I think it was a really poor decision on Apple's part to (allegedly) push forward anyway with this product. A $2,000 Ultra tier iPhone....that lacks the most fundamental iPhone feature, and replaces it with Side Button Touch ID, which if you've ever used on an iPad Air, is truthfully and without hyperbole the worst user experience Apple has ever shipped.
Actually, iPhone 17 Pro Max has a superior
Well, duh. That's like saying an iPad has unrivaled battery capacity compared to iPhone. Yeah, it does, because it has more space to house it, which is fortunate, because has a much bigger screen to power (the primary draw on battery).

Very likely the fold will have competitive battery life with the Pro Max model. Not anything dramatically greater. Though it's a given that it will last longer when only using it folded.

Still though...if true that this product does not have Face ID...I don't know how anyone is going to get past that. I think it was a really poor decision on Apple's part to (allegedly) push forward anyway with this product. A $2,000 Ultra tier iPhone....that lacks the most fundamental iPhone feature, and replaces it with Side Button Touch ID, which if you've ever used on an iPad Air, is truthfully and without hyperbole the worst user experience Apple has ever shipped.
Actually, iPhone 17 Pro Max has a much superior battery life compared to any Apple iPads. You will never be able to kill this phone in one day. As a matter of fact, all iPhone 17 series minus Air have longer battery life endurance than iPads. But M5 chip inside iPad Pro increased battery life quite a bit.
 
silver is down 20% since this weekend by the way.
It has nothing to do with real world use of silver, and everything to do with the orange clown.
I got in way before last week ;-) it's not just politics. China doesn't buy because Trump says to.
 
Unrivalled you say?

IMG_9130.jpeg
 
But when it’s unfolded. There are two screens lol
Well fortunately there’s already Android phones we can look at so we know the effect of two screens on the battery. Over on Android the Z fold gets 10-11 hours. That’s from a 4400mAh battery so the iPhone may be slightly better, but don’t expect 20 hours. Tests have shown it will do about 15% better if you never use the inner screen.

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.