Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If this is true... I'm not impressed. Too geographically specific to be interesting. Yosemite, maybe... Mavericks is good is because of it's second meaning. But for the most part it just feels like a bunch of inward looking folks trying to convince the rest of the world they live in a cool place. California, while nice, doesn't quite have the same 'cool factor' that it used. And, according to a report on MR - about 66% of Apples sales are international. The Big Cats were a global naming scheme.

That said... I wonder if there aren't a couple of other shell companies trademarking places names from the around the world. That is something I could get interested in.
 
"Mammoth" is the only one of these names that sounds cool to me.

It would be particularly appropriate for a future OS X update that comes with a ton of new features, but is maybe a bit slow and bloated.
 
OS X Barstow wouldn't bee a good sign. :D

Just after that would be OS X Bat Country. It doesn't stop there.

I really hate the arrogant California ego-centrism.
Queue the song 'Take California' from the Propellerheads.

Cue, not queue.

The names aren't that bad, but are they really about to make a mockery of the decimal system? 10.10 is mathematically identical to 10.1...

They're strings separated by a delimiter, not numbers.
 
OS X Deathstar. That would be a good un" :D

I would buy the ***** out of that. I know, it's a free upgrade. I'll pay $30 for it.

If this is true... I'm not impressed. Too geographically specific to be interesting. Yosemite, maybe... Mavericks is good is because of it's second meaning. But for the most part it just feels like a bunch of inward looking folks trying to convince the rest of the world they live in a cool place. California, while nice, doesn't quite have the same 'cool factor' that it used. And, according to a report on MR - about 66% of Apples sales are international. The Big Cats were a global naming scheme.

That said... I wonder if there aren't a couple of other shell companies trademarking places names from the around the world. That is something I could get interested in.

To be fair, the name is the last thing I'm thinking about while I'm using it.

----------

:confused:

Sure... right after OSX Google

I prefer OSX Netscape.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OS X you are getting old no matter what pseudo name Apple gives you! It's like a women saying she's 27 every birthday when you know she's north of 30 and fooling no one!

Apple it's time to move on from X. Give 'Z' a try?!? :apple:
/
/
 
The names aren't that bad, but are they really about to make a mockery of the decimal system? 10.10 is mathematically identical to 10.1...

They are version numbers, not decimal numbers. Different rules apply.
 
OS X Yosemite Sam


yosemite-sam.gif


Anyone? No? Ok.
 
OS X you are getting old no matter what pseudo name Apple gives you! It's like a women saying she's 27 every birthday when you know she's north of 30 and fooling no one!

Apple it's time to move on from X. Give 'Z' a try?!? :apple:
/
/

I think Apple's having a hard time getting rid of that cool X. By most normal versioning standards, which up the number after any huge architectural changes, OSX should be OSXII by this point at least. The big Intel switch should've been OSXI, and Lion should've been XII.

Usually the numbers represent big change dot little change dot bug fixes.
 
What's the advantage of using a shill company here to register trademarks? I can see if for things like CarPlay where they might want to hide future projects (and where the name might give the goal of said project away), but I can't see that being a big deal for the names alone of the now-apparently-annual OS X updates.

Problem is if Apple gets a trademark for one of these places, then some scammer will notice and try to get trademarks for other names as quick as possible, and Apple has to pay out. And Apple doesn't have any rights to get a trademark for "Yosemite", for example, just because they are a big company.
 
How come OSX gets cool cat & place-names, while iOS is still using version numbers alone? I wanna upgrade to iOS Butterfly :) Or maybe it should be named after smaller places (since it's a 'mini' mobile OS)... iOS Cucamonga?
 
Problem is if Apple gets a trademark for one of these places, then some scammer will notice and try to get trademarks for other names as quick as possible, and Apple has to pay out. And Apple doesn't have any rights to get a trademark for "Yosemite", for example, just because they are a big company.

For them to get a trademark on a physical location and have it stick against Apple, they'd have to make an OS, and have a version to cover every famous landmark and tourist attraction in California.
 
We've found a bunch more:

- Diablo, Miramar, Rincon, and El Cap (Landmark Associates LLC)
- Redtail, Condor, and Grizzly (Cassowary Devices LLC)
- Farallon, Tiburon, and Monterey (Asilomar Enterprises LLC)
- Skyline, Shasta, and Sierra (Antalos Apps LLC)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.