Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
OS X YOLO...courtesy of Drake or Mac Dre...however you want to put it

Yolo county near Sacramento laid claim to that long before Dre and Drake were gleams in their parents' eyes.

BL.
 
I live very close to Apple's headquarters. I rock climb in Yosemite, ski in Mammoth, run marathons in Big Sur, hike through the Redwoods, and surf in Pacifica. I love California!
 
I live very close to Apple's headquarters. I rock climb in Yosemite, ski in Mammoth, run marathons in Big Sur, hike through the Redwoods, and surf in Pacifica. I love California!

i live by a bunch of apple stores ..i play dodge_the_dog_crap all the time..

I❤️NY
 
I'm aware.

Ubuntu actually uses a bit more sane version numbering. The latest is actually 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr. Much newer than 13.10 Saucy Salamander. But they do use XX.04 (LTS release) and XX.10 (standard release), adding in the leading zero.

(LTS is short for long term support, where security updates are guaranteed for 3 years minimum. Standard releases are supported usually only for ~1 year).

However, I'm glad you pointed out that the X doesn't mean 10 in reference to OS X. So many people are confused by this, coming after OS9 and all.

I'm aware of the Ubuntu numbering method, but felt it irrelevant to go into detail with it to make my point. .04 doesn't always refer to an LTS release though, see 13.04 for example. 12.04 was the LTS release prior to 14.04
 
I still think they should've started using constellations. At least it would've matched the last couple desktop backgrounds (apart from Mav)

D.

Space theme would be great.

OS X Andromeda

----------

The names aren't that bad, but are they really about to make a mockery of the decimal system? 10.10 is mathematically identical to 10.1...

Software versioning ≠ Decimals.

----------

I mean, OS X is kind of tired. You can only promote a version 10 of a product for so long. Having version 10.10, 10.11 is just dumb, period.

Perhaps its time for Apple to invest some of them billions into marketing a new OS name, I mean, call it xOS even to get rid of the X = 10 moniker and match the iOS branding syntax.

At some point Apple is going to have to ball up and update the version to 11.

Why should they, why do they need to? They'll make a new OS down the line when they truly reinvent it, not just an incremental upgrade. Even Steve Jobs himself said the OS X name would last 20 or so years.
 
What about OS X Bakersfield?

Like man, OS X Humbolt

Like Dude, OS X Santa Cruz

Oh my gawd! OS X San Fernando

I have this bug up my butt! OS X Napa

Woz in the house! OS X Los Gatos

Rollin, Rollin, Rollin, Keep those Doggies rollin! OS X San Joaquin

This is all fake! OS X Hollywood

Faster zoom! OS X Sonoma

----------

STOP THE MADNESS!!!!

I'd be (mildly) surprised if we don't make it to Mac OS X 10.20.

My fav story is they were considering Renneasance artists like OS X Raphael. Problem was the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles reference.
 
I'm still waiting for Mac OS X Cougar

lol

Mac OSX urban cougar

attachment.php
 
Not a fan of Grizzly.. lol maybe for an OS geared towards toddlers.


Personally, the patent office needs to be reworked so that companies can apply for a secret patent and given 6 months of privacy before made public.

That should greatly reduce the amount of shell companies needed.

----------

maybe 10.2x can be about US Presidents?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.