The names aren't that bad, but are they really about to make a mockery of the decimal system? 10.10 is mathematically identical to 10.1...
Yes, but software versions/build numbers have never been mathematically numbered.
The names aren't that bad, but are they really about to make a mockery of the decimal system? 10.10 is mathematically identical to 10.1...
No. It is not. Software versioning does not follow mathematical rules.
It's more like the 10th update to OS 10.
There was a 10.4.11.
The names aren't that bad, but are they really about to make a mockery of the decimal system? 10.10 is mathematically identical to 10.1...
I have friends there so I know Poway well. I've spent several lifetimes there one weekend. Also, I could live with OSX Poway. And I still live in the Duke city, But I can hear Los Lunes calling me home.
Damn, after re reading the last paragraph I really gotta take my meds.
All future OS X names:
Amsterdam
Angels Camp
Aromas
~~~~~~~~~
Wimp
You Bet
Yreka Zzyzx
When OS X was first released didn't Phil Schiller say it would be the OS for the next 10-15 years? With an initial release of March 24, 2001 we're nearing the 15 year mark. So what's next? Is there much life left in OS X? I'm a big Apple fan and not trolling at all.
The new names are more and more difficult to remember for foreigners...
Don't worry, that whole chunk of coastal California is going to fall off into the ocean when the big one hits...you couldn't pay me to live there!
How about 'XP' ?
Apple XP
sounds good.
OS X Compton
I mean, OS X is kind of tired. You can only promote a version 10 of a product for so long. Having version 10.10, 10.11 is just dumb, period.
Perhaps its time for Apple to invest some of them billions into marketing a new OS name, I mean, call it xOS even to get rid of the X = 10 moniker and match the iOS branding syntax.
At some point Apple is going to have to ball up and update the version to 11.
You appear to have typed 'nobody' when you actually meant to write 'a very small number of people'.I'm not trying to be rude, but nobody seems to get that it's not weird for software to cross the .10 mark.
I'm not trying to be rude, but nobody seems to get that it's not weird for software to cross the .10 mark. An example would be Ubuntu, whose last release was 13.10. OS X is a well known brand, and it would be like making a new MacBook Pro, called ComputerSystem instead of Mac. It's the name of the system,. The X refers to the Unix kernel that it is based on, and will not change until we leave the Unix like system, which won't happen anytime soon, if ever. I mean the system we run now is nothing like the original Unix, except it works with the same commands. The algorithms for the commands have been changed a lot though. It is not only because it came after OS 9. It would be incredibly sad if Apple were to abandon the OS X name.
Ubuntu actually uses a bit more sane version numbering. The latest is actually 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr. Much newer than 13.10 Saucy Salamander. But they do use XX.04 (LTS release) and XX.10 (standard release), adding in the leading zero.
(LTS is short for long term support, where security updates are guaranteed for 3 years minimum. Standard releases are supported usually only for ~1 year).
When OS X was first released didn't Phil Schiller say it would be the OS for the next 10-15 years? With an initial release of March 24, 2001 we're nearing the 15 year mark. So what's next? Is there much life left in OS X? I'm a big Apple fan and not trolling at all.
It's a little different than that. Ubuntu releases twice a year on April (04) and October (10). The version number is the year it's released. So this year we'll get 14.04, an LTS release which happens every 2 years with the 04's (last one was 12.04), and 14.10. Next year, it'll be 15.04, and 15.10, with the next LTS being 16.04.
FUN FACTS!