Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Aluminium is a guess. And a wrong one.

Even if it's hard anodized to withstand scratching, aluminium is too soft to withstand the mechanical strain a wristwatch is exposed to. It will bend, tear or pull apart.
I strongly doubt that the wristband is going to be made of aluminium. But I am quite sure that the "body" of the watch will at least partially be made of aluminium.
 
Not particularly, if the likes of Apple want people to wear it, it's very much about the aesthetical appeal and from a personal viewpoint I can't stand rectangular watches.

I guess it depends on what you're going to be using it for. Like many have stated in multiple threads, people aren't going to stop wearing $10,000 watches for this. Quite frankly, I don't see people ditching sub $500 Movados for this, either.

Where I do see this catching on is in the wearable fitness category. That is even further supported by many rumors of having advanced biometrics as part of the device.

So is it meant to be a fashion watch or a functional piece of equipment? Knowing Apple, they will probably focus more on the former, which in that case, sure - a circular design that will primarily show a watch face will most likely be a good bet. But if it is the latter, then square/rectangle makes more sense as it will provide a screen with as much data and navigation as possible.
 
I'll buy this watch if it runs Yosemite running Final Cut Pro, Steam games, and VMWare running Windows 7 on it and that the speed is at least as fast as my Mac Mini.

If Moore's Law keeps going a little while longer, then you might get your wish in 5 years or so. ;)
 
Rectangular smart watches were a pretty big thing 25 years ago. :)
Image

I can already see the responses to the keynote on Sep 9: "Huh? What? That is nothing new! Casio invented the smartwatch!"

Pfft, Casio may have invented the smartwatch but Hewlett Packard invented the golden luxury smartwatch.
hp-01_015_small.jpg
 
This really seems like the first device in a long time that people have no idea what it will be like, if true. I am pretty excited to be honest.
 
Long ago I decided I would probably never wear a watch again. Then my brother bought me a watch for my birthday, so I wore it just cuz. Now I can't stand to be without it.

However, the only way I could have made this conversion is because I never have to take it off, i.e., the battery lasts months (years? haven't had it that long) and it's waterproof. Unless a smartwatch can be similarly zero mental overhead I don't think they will fly. The waterproofing (at least for showering, washing hands, swimming, other typical activities) is definitely solvable. The battery, on the other hand, i think is a more difficult issue.

Anyone want to speculate with me about liquid metal iWatch? :) :)
 
Rectangular smart watches were a pretty big thing 25 years ago. :)
Image

I can already see the responses to the keynote on Sep 9: "Huh? What? That is nothing new! Casio invented the smartwatch!"

If it has a 1,5'' screen as the biggest, expect no doubt this form factor:

iwatch-concept-nike.jpg


I'm a watch collector, so I know something about watch design nowadays, and I can tell you there is no way they release a 1,5'' rounded or perfectly squared watch
 
However, the only way I could have made this conversion is because I never have to take it off, i.e., the battery lasts months (years? haven't had it that long) and it's waterproof.

I got a Soviet watch in 1989, while visiting the USSR. Bought a dozen of them for probably the equivalent of $5. Still working like a charm, with manual charging.

il_570xN.124135044.jpg
 
If it has a 1,5'' screen as the biggest, expect no doubt this form factor:

Image

I'm a watch collector, so I know something about watch design nowadays, and I can tell you there is no way they release a 1,5'' rounded or perfect squared watch

I would love this form factor, personally. But I use these as fitness trackers, not a fashion piece.
 
If you follow the pattern of the Moto 360, the first 'smartwatch' that people are actually excited about form and function, it took about 3 months from it being announced and a SDK released to an anticipated launch later this month (we'll find out later today). Sto to speculate a similar 3 month run up from announcement to shipping, that definitely can push to early 2015, so I don't think it's so far fetched to think that, and not because nothing has been "heard" about it. Plenty has been heard, including Ive's comments in the thread right below this one...

1. Apple had a history of not doing as other companies do so not really a good yardstick
2. If this device is being made in the US it is plausible that it is basically ready to launch and has actually stayed a secret. Just like the specs of the Mac Pro did.
3. I believe you mean alleged comments.
 
Nobody has talked about FaceTime for the iWatch, but I think this would be a great feature.
 
This we don't know. It could hold media on itself or it should just stream media from other devices. 9th September we shall know.

No, we don't know. But neither does Kuo. And based on what makes the most sense for the consumer, I'd place my bets on it not needing storage itself except just a little for some tiny apps.
 
Render

Please APPLE don't ever hire the person who created that render. I am intrigued by the iWatch, but that render completely kills any desire for a new toy...
 
Honestly, I don't see anything innovatie in this products. Eddy cue said this is going to be best apple product pipeline in 25 years but i think that he was wrong. There is nothing special about iphone and iwatch according to this rumors. I wont buy iwatch if it wont have flexible display as rumored before
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.