Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I use an aftermarket adapter to convert my wired CarPlay into wireless CarPlay! EASY! And it actually works in my 2017 Honda Civic Ex. I love it!!!!!

Where's it made?
Is it secure?
Does it overheat?
Does it have verified CE certification?
 
I was a huge advocate of the Lightning port because of its elegant design, but with three iPhones in a row where the phones stopped charging because the port itself was not making a good connection, I've now become an advocate of USB-C, which has been exceptional.

The 30-pin connector never failed me over 8 years, but the Lightning connector failed me continuously over 4 years. Sad.
 
I believe Jobs also described OS X as setting Apple up with an operating system for Mac "for the next 20 years." Fascinatingly, I've never heard 2021 called an "expiration date" with respect to that, perhaps not least because it proved not even to resemble one.
 
The main reason that I prefer having the lightning port on my iPhone most of the time is because I’m using the phone while it’s charging and obviously once Apple transitions to wireless charging that will no longer be an option

I also use the Apple smart battery case for my iPhone 11 Pro and unless Apple has a wireless battery case for the iPhone 14 next year, that no longer will be an option- The only thing comparable to that right now is the smart battery pack that works with both the iPhone 12 and iPhone 13 but it’s not the same as the smart battery case which does a great job of protecting the phone
Have you not seen videos how magsafe works? It's no issue to use your phone while wirelessly charging.. So that's a null point frankly.. I would prefer they include USB-C at some point...
 
Doesn't wireless charging consume around 50% more energy than wired charging?
And so, would a 'no ports' iPhone be a responsible move for a company that claims to care about the environment?
 
I just hope they switch to USB-C.. they can't get rid of the port completely, too many devices rely upon some kind of physical port, namely millions of cars that have Apple CarPlay. They would piss off a lot of people if they killed it off completely unless they can magically turn all those cars into wireless CarPlay.

apple music lossless & hi res lossless secure having a port for the foreseeable future. hi res requires external hardware to take advantage of that cannot be accomplished wirelessly.
 
Lighting was something in 2012 but usb 2 speed is just a shame now a days.
And wireless transfer for a 256GB device sold as a camera capable of serious video recorder is like selling Ferraris with mountain bikes wheels

ridiculous

And come on! Better water resistant?? Please b***h
 
Here the big thing as everybody knows, is a out loud secret, Lighting makes a lot of money for Apple with a tech they developed 10 years ago, there is no better return in market than that.

Ask anyone in business. Is just the gold tree. OK, lighting benefits can be small compared with other Apple sold products but! Is the obly product doesnt need a cent on R+D as it works exactly as 10 years ago. A wet dream (a very old wet dream)
 
There’s no consistency. That’s the problem. It’s a mess
Dunno, they have used lightning on phones for 10 years now, that’s pretty consistent. ?

as long as they don’t go wireless charging only, it’s super inefficient compared to plugging in.
 
Apple can't move to a portless design in the short to long run. Cell phones have been integrated into automobile echo systems that use CarPlay. Most cars still cannot pair with most CarPlay enabled cars as most still require a wired connection to function. Even if all manufactures magically supported wireless pairing to CarPlay this year, the deployed base of cars will still be around in large numbers for up to 10 years or more. Thus, short stopgap products, the transition will have to include ported phones for at least that period. The best solution until then will be USB-C port support. Lightning though is dead.
 
Frankly I don't think they will need a port in 2 years. Between wireless charging and 5G the main issue I'm going to have is the usability and reliable transfer of my local files, which will be photos and video.
 
I don't think it would be economically viable for Apple to employ USB-C.
At this point I'd rather see them doing something bold such as removing the port alltogether, only to be mocked by the whole industry and subsequentially copied.
 
There is no way the iPhone is going port less. With the 13 the quality of video you can now shoot produces files so large that the bottleneck is no longer on the device but getting the files off the device. Lightning is simply not up to the task and wireless technology is not either. If Apple is serious about things then getting these files off the device with alacrity is a vital step and USB C / Thunderbolt is the most obvious unless they update lightning, but why spend the $$??
 
There is no way the iPhone is going port less. With the 13 the quality of video you can now shoot produces files so large that the bottleneck is no longer on the device but getting the files off the device. Lightning is simply not up to the task and wireless technology is not either. If Apple is serious about things then getting these files off the device with alacrity is a vital step and USB C / Thunderbolt is the most obvious unless they update lightning, but why spend the $$??
I wish I could peek ahead 100 years to see how remote transfers take place in that era, using hyper-scale parallel quantum entanglement. The above will sound super quaint, like someone describing using the starter handle on a Model T Ford limiting how quickly a car engine can start!
 
My speculation is that they will release a new connector, Ball Lightning, that further evolves the 'double sided' lightning connector to instead be a round barrel-style connector, with multiple connecting stripes such that all one needs to do is insert it completely at any rotation.

Perhaps somewhere between 3 and 4mm in diameter seems appropriate.
 
Where's it made?
Is it secure?
Does it overheat?
Does it have verified CE certification?
Probably China, where a lot of macs and iPhone are produced. I believe it's secure, the company is trusted by many buyers. It doesn't overheat, I use it all the time! And, I don't know about the CE cert, haven't checked.

I'm just happy it works. I really wanted Wireless CarPlay, and now I have it. It's pretty awesome, isn't laggy, and sounds great!!!
 
I believe Jobs also described OS X as setting Apple up with an operating system for Mac "for the next 20 years." Fascinatingly, I've never heard 2021 called an "expiration date" with respect to that, perhaps not least because it proved not even to resemble one.
While it looks and feels similar to the original OS X, modern macOS is a completely different animal from that build. Apple has made multiple transitions under the hood since then.

It's actually pretty remarkable how they have managed to keep macOS modern and fresh despite its age.
 
The iPads use USB-C. The MacBook Air and all MBPs use USB-C (plus magnetic charger). The iPhone is the lone Lightning connector. Only the desktops don’t use USB-C for charging. Get with the program, Apple.
 


When Phil Schiller introduced the Lightning connector at the unveiling of the iPhone 5 in September 2012, he called it "a modern connector for the next decade," and with that 10-year mark coming up later this year, questions remain over what the future of the iPhone looks like and whether or not that future will include a Lightning port, or perhaps no port at all.

iP14-Lightning-Portless-Feature-blue.jpg

Every iPhone since the iPhone 5 has featured a Lightning port, which Apple touted in 2012 as a "smaller, smarter and more durable" port compared to the previous 30-pin connector. Even as the majority of the company's iPad line and the entire Mac line now feature USB-C, the iPhone has become the odd one out with its inclusion of Lightning.

The smartphone industry has rapidly transitioned to USB-C, with the vast majority of handsets on the market featuring the more versatile port. Apple's reluctance to follow the industry in adopting USB-C has annoyed many customers, but it appears Apple is sticking with Lightning on iPhone for the considerable future.

Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, who frequently shares accurate insights into Apple's product plans, has said the company believes the adoption of USB-C would negatively impact its Made for ‌iPhone‌ (MFi) program and notes that Apple is concerned about lower standards of water resistance for USB-C compared to Lightning. Given those two points, Kuo says the iPhone will continue to feature Lightning for the "foreseeable future."

Apple-Prefer-Lightning-Over-USB-C-Feature.jpg

Apple's ultimate goal for the iPhone is to go completely portless, relying on MagSafe and wireless connections for charging and data transfer needs. MagSafe on the iPhone, which first debuted on the iPhone 12, is still not fully matured and is so far limited to charging. Apple is highly unlikely to abandon Lightning and adopt USB-C for only a few years before going portless. Instead, it's more likely to use Lightning while continuing to MagSafe matures for a future portless iPhone.

The European Commission could, however, impact how soon we get a portless iPhone. The EC has proposed a directive that would require all consumer electronic devices, including smartphones, tablets, cameras, headphones, portable speakers, and handheld videogame consoles, to feature a "common port," aka, USB-C. If the directive does pass in 2022, companies such as Apple will have two years to transition their devices to USB-C.

There are some caveats, though. On paper, the directive would constitute a significant change for the iPhone as it would be forced to include USB-C, but the directive only applies to devices that charge via cable.


A spokesperson for the EC confirmed to The Verge that if a device exclusively charges via wireless charging, it isn't required to include a USB-C port. That, alongside the two-year transition period that the directive would allocate to companies to transition to USB-C, gives Apple ample time to mature MagSafe and abandon Lightning in favor of an all-wireless future.

Apple's confusing port lineup has not gone unnoticed. Across the latest iPhone, iPad, MacBook Pro, Apple Watch, and AirPods models, Apple offers customers four completely different types of chargers to juice up their devices. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman highlighted the inconsistency in his Power On newsletter this past August. As Gurman noted at the time, "Lightning served Apple well since 2012, but USB-C has clearly won out across the industry and has become the default connector for new devices."


Article Link: Apple's Lightning Port is Nearing Its Expiration Date, So What's Next for the iPhone?
If that port goes away how will Apple car play work?
 
I would love USB C but honestly it wouldn’t mean not having a lighting cable with me. Still need it for AirPods Max and AirPods Pro (though in case of pro I could use wireless charging). If they did away with ports all together, that would render my CarPlay useless, as it depends on a wired connection to work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacLappy
Yeah, but it's horrible. You still have a cord hanging off your phone, but now with a bulbous chunk on the back -- and as a bonus it charges slower, costs a lot more and generates more heat. Great solution.

If I’m using my phone while charging it’s because I’m gaming or watching a movie. Both occur in landscape mode and I much prefer the cord in the middle than shooting out the side.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.