So many people will be disappointed they 'didn't wait' when this appears.
Well ofc it is more expensive. M1 is not going anywhere.
So many people will be disappointed they 'didn't wait' when this appears.
My biggest frustration with MacOS and iPadOS is Safari. It isn't equipped to handle the modern web very well. My second biggest peeve with iPadOS is crappy external monitor support. iPadOS could be great if it had a proper browser and monitor support.
You assume some random journalist has a better understanding of the situation than you? You are way too optimistic about the state of journalism.That was quick, I was expecting M2 next year and the M1X this year? I wonder what the core count and GPU will be?
MacBook Pro for Oct then and maybe the fabled 30+" iMac.
Only if it's turned on, or the capacitors still hold a charge, when you start licking it.Forget the M2, the next Apple chip will shock you.
That’s my clickbait headline.
Base iMac has the 7 gpu core variant just like the base Air. The mini is hence better - as I stressed - internally. I can't recall this ever being the case.Define "better" though.
For a bunch of folks there's substantial value in simplicity of choosing an AIO system, and they're willing to pay for that.
You likely don't fit into that market segment. I don't either. Yet I know folks who do.
Then it was ridiculous too when everyone complaind about the air and pro, right? It's about product separation, which right now is minimal.32gb. Ram is not the be all and end all, and unified memory is much faster and more capable in general. The chip set, whilst having less configurable ram is demonstrably faster and more capable than the predecessors- by a long way.
You’re not comparing a machine to the machine it superseded but to some other machine? That’s a bit ridiculous don’t you think?
It's not an AIO with the adapter. I cant' see much difference whether you "have to hide" a mini or an adapter.Its purpose is to provide a nice all-in-one computer with a screen that is much larger than is reasonable for a laptop. It may not be for you, but it is exactly what lots of us want.
A thunderbolt monitor would definitely be a welcome addition, but certainly not a replacement.
This iMac is faster, by a large margin, than the iMac it’s replacing. I don’t think anyone in the market for an iMac is going to mind at all.It's like reusing a old chip.
Whatever the new chip is called is kind of irrelevant to me. It will be the new chip that came out after the M1. And who knows, perhaps it is based on the upcoming A15?You assume some random journalist has a better understanding of the situation than you? You are way too optimistic about the state of journalism.
OF COURSE this is the "M1X", not the M2! ie it's A14 generation hardware with more cores and DRAM; it's not A15 generation hardware!
What many folks on MacRumors don’t realize is that EVERY member of this forum could wait… and it wouldn’t even show up as a blip in Apple’s financialsLife is full of disappointment... we could ALL wait and not buy anything and Apple would go out of business ...
What do you think Apple will do for the higher tier versions, such as the 16 inch? Will it be an M1 with more cores and other small architectural differences, or will it be completely different overall?
Translation: “HEY mobile processors should be WAY underpowered/underfeatured compared to desktop processors. Why? Umm, well it’s what I’m used to. This strange new world where mobile and desktop performance (That, across the board, leads the industry) is unfamiliar and frightening.”But kinda makes the iMac redundant. With intel macbook air/ pro 13 had the worst sustained performance, then mini with integrated graphics as cheap desktop entry, then imac with dedicated graphics. Now all four are the same except a fan. A desktop should be more powerful, configurable with more ram, have more ports. Imac delivers neither. It's only purpose is to push the price of the real entry imac with better chips much higher.
Mac Pro gets the M1XS Plus Pro Max.M1 Pro Max for the Mac Pro?