Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No that would be tMOBILE ME... :D

Whether an app or a .mac update, who hear wants to have "Mobile Me" become apart of their daily lexicon?

Not Me.

Like I read from some other site's visitor post...

"...Mobile Me is not one of the names I'd choose -- sounds like Dr. Evil's sidekick (or his T-Mobile Sidekick?)..." :rolleyes:

If .mac had to be renamed, what are some of the choices people would like for that new name?

stumps me why they didn't just go with iMobile, it's good neough for half their other products
 
These are all codewords for bringing back...

e-World!!!!!!! After years of death El Jobso is going to bring back e-world! And it is going to rock your socks like nothing you have ever seen before. Today we have the Internet and Internet 2. Well now we are going to have e-World 2. Which is like the Internet 500. It's going to include multi-phasic interdimensional communication nodes between the server and your mac. It will have 3D multi touch psionic activated screens and controls. And get this! It will include FTL multi-dimensional bandwidth channels (mac only). And it will be available ON keynote day!!

X
 
Guys you should really go to Dropbox


i'm sure many of you will give up .Mac with no regrets afterwards.

This is the only true alternatives to the iDisk and sync tools.

Looking forward to see the keynote though
 
Some server side mail filter would be great.
especially with push mail

.Mac needs some love but if they can get it right people will start to get rid of there computer in favour good mobile devices, cloud services are the bridge to that happening. Your option are to pay upfront or sell your data to ad revenue.
 
I bet they'll keep the .Mac name and add MobileMe as an extension or feature of .Mac. Like Back to My Mac. It's part of .Mac but not a product all by it's lonesome.
 
iServer?

As in "Hey dude, upload that sht to your iServer so Wendy can see it."
 
Mobile Me is a fresh and funky name. Miles away from the made up word Macintosh which I always thought was a bit weird.
 
Of course Apple lost their big change when the iPhone was first released. I had been hoping that they would become a MVNO and offered VOIP service tied in with .Mac. Oh well, maybe now it's still not too late to actually offer something unique and different with this service. It's never been anything special but has seriously languished with no real improvements in years. Major lack of followthrough from Apple seeing what they could have done with this service.

It is fairly unknown to have out of the box integration with a .Mac style product though - that's its selling point. It would be nice if they were to get rid of the Backup app and integrate that into Time Machine in some way - its rather clunky at the moment.
 
Guys you should really go to Dropbox


i'm sure many of you will give up .Mac with no regrets afterwards.

This is the only true alternatives to the iDisk and sync tools.

Looking forward to see the keynote though

Looking at this, I still wouldn't call this a true alternative, I so far haven't found anything that really is. With the benefits of 'back to my mac' and web gallery etc I think this is still the best around. The only draw back is that here, in the UK the speeds are dreadful, that's the only pain for me so I leave heavy files to transfer overnight, not always useful when you want things done 'there and then' something fundamental to .Mac

Does anyone think they'll bother sorting out the bad European speeds?
 
Get the .mac basics right first

I joined the mac world a year ago and can't imagine going back to a pc again. The experience has been an eye opener - from ichat, front row, imovie, iphoto, etc. Everything integrates into my life painlessly. I have only found one problem that is annoying and I am really looking forward to this .mac update to address this.

That is the simple ability to have online access (from any pc, not just a mac) of my ical calendar and for changes to sync to my home imac. In other words, I use a pc at work and have wanted was to use a .mac account to access (and be able to edit) my ical calendar at work, so I only have to keep one calendar. To date, this can not be done with a .mac account. Yes I could publish my ical calendar and "view it" from any computer, but this is not useful. I have tried using plaxo or spanningsync to snyc various calendars (e.g. google calendar which I can access online at work) to ical, but this has proved problematic and I gave up.

So, I say please, please Apple fix this simple issue before things get more complicated with stuff I won't use. This just seems like such a basic feature that has been missing and has kept me from getting a .mac account.
 
Is .Mac worth it

No! The mail is as good as google but google is free. You can store your address book on it but you can do that with Yahoo and Gmail for free. You can post pictures on it but you can do that with a whole lot of websites for free. Back to my Mac is cool, but it doesn't work on a consistent basses. The iWed feature is OK if you want to do your own website but have no clue about web design. So in short, if you need to do quick and dirty websites then maybe it's worth it, If not then save your money.



This may push me into finally getting .Mac.

Anyone know of any great advantages to having an account (as .Mac exists now)? Just curious as to what people use it for...
 
iTunes Cloud

So, "providing iTunes wirelessly over cell phone networks" could mean that all of this 'mobile me' content is sync-able over the cell phone network. Maybe it's a 'clould' storage service for iTunes content, i.e. just like your iPhone, you have a 'Mobile Me' item on the sidebar in iTunes, and you can drag media content onto it, and then stream/download/sync this content to your iPhone when out and about. Maybe it's a bit ambitious for 3G networks, so maybe it's a wifi concept. I dunno.

Hmmm... consider:

--someday, high-speed broadband Internet access in the US will be ubiquitous and inexpensive (as it apparently is in parts of Europe and Asia)

--someday, large amounts of backed-up Cloud storage will be available at low cost

When, these "somedays" converge the distinction between local storage and Cloud storage will begin to blur.

Here's a what if:

What if Apple changed the way iTunes (store and client) works.

-- Instead of buying and downloading AV from iTunes, you just buy with the ability to synch

-- The iTunes servers in the Cloud contain all the AV files and your Account would contain digital, synchable tokens for all the AV you have purchased (or rented). The tokens would contain descriptive information.

-- The iTunes client on your computer would normally just have the synchable tokens not the actual AV files.

-- You could manipulate these tokens (search, sort, favs, playlists, etc.) just as you currently do. With no large AV files to deal with, this could be done with a Widget, Web App, or iPhone App.

-- When you synch to, say, an iPod, the actual AV files can be download to the iPod.

-- Optionally, you could download or pre-synch (any or all) of the physical AV files... say, pre-building playlists for a party, or movies for a weekend "personal film festival", etc.

So, now you have all the goodness of a large AV repository in the Cloud: unlimited storage; automatic backup/redundancy; access from anywhere; access on demand; easy to use, manipulate, manage.

But, you have none of the badness: no expensive, failure-prone large local HDDs; no backup headaches; no migration headaches.

Likely, Apple could save lots of bandwidth by just downloading the tokens when you buy instead of downloading each and every file purchased. Then, when you synch/play a song or video Apple could multi-serve (or peer to peer) the same copy to any others accessing the same file-- I suspect that there would be a lot of potential bandwidth saving for new/popular releases, etc.

That would be pretty cool!

Now, here's the good part:

What if Apple were to offer a service that allows you to upload the non-iTunes-purchased files in your AV collection to the iTunes servers in the Cloud?

Now, your entire AV collection is accessible as above, backed-up (off site), yet synchable, playable and manageable through the iTunes client on your computer.

And, the iTunes (Store) button on the iPhone or Touch would have access to your entire private AV collection.

Then, Apple could jigger iPhoto and iMovie so they can interface/utilize the iTunes Cloud concept to store, manage, and access your photo and home video collection.

I would pay for that!

Actually, I already have about $4,000 worth of hardware just to locally store/serve/backup my AV collection, pictures, and a few home videos. And, I am looking at a $250/year service to provide Cloud storage to back this up.

I revise and extend my remark, above:

I would gladly pay for that!
 
i enjoy my .mac account, but the name mobile me really sucks.

mobile mac would be better, if they have to change it.
 
Macintosh Weird????

You really think it's made up? A Macintosh Apple is the symbol of learning. Give the teacher an Apple, Apple falling on Newtons head, those sliding math boards for pre schoolers where you move the little Apple to teach math? Come on dude, wake up and smell the Apple.:apple:



Mobile Me is a fresh and funky name. Miles away from the made up word Macintosh which I always thought was a bit weird.
 
You're hired.:D

Hmmm... consider:

--someday, high-speed broadband Internet access in the US will be ubiquitous and inexpensive (as it apparently is in parts of Europe and Asia)

--someday, large amounts of backed-up Cloud storage will be available at low cost

When, these "somedays" converge the distinction between local storage and Cloud storage will begin to blur.

Here's a what if:

What if Apple changed the way iTunes (store and client) works.

-- Instead of buying and downloading AV from iTunes, you just buy with the ability to synch

-- The iTunes servers in the Cloud contain all the AV files and your Account would contain digital, synchable tokens for all the AV you have purchased (or rented). The tokens would contain descriptive information.
-- The iTunes client on your computer would normally just have the synchable tokens not the actual AV files.

-- You could manipulate these tokens (search, sort, favs, playlists, etc.) just as you currently do. With no large AV files to deal with, this could be done with a Widget, Web App, or iPhone App.

-- When you synch to, say, an iPod, the actual AV files can be download to the iPod.

-- Optionally, you could download or pre-synch (any or all) of the physical AV files... say, pre-building playlists for a party, or movies for a weekend "personal film festival", etc.

So, now you have all the goodness of a large AV repository in the Cloud: unlimited storage; automatic backup/redundancy; access from anywhere; access on demand; easy to use, manipulate, manage.

But, you have none of the badness: no expensive, failure-prone large local HDDs; no backup headaches; no migration headaches.

Likely, Apple could save lots of bandwidth by just downloading the tokens when you buy instead of downloading each and every file purchased. Then, when you synch/play a song or video Apple could multi-serve (or peer to peer) the same copy to any others accessing the same file-- I suspect that there would be a lot of potential bandwidth saving for new/popular releases, etc.

That would be pretty cool!

Now, here's the good part:

What if Apple were to offer a service that allows you to upload the non-iTunes-purchased files in your AV collection to the iTunes servers in the Cloud?

Now, your entire AV collection is accessible as above, backed-up (off site), yet synchable, playable and manageable through the iTunes client on your computer.

And, the iTunes (Store) button on the iPhone or Touch would have access to your entire private AV collection.

Then, Apple could jigger iPhoto and iMovie so they can interface/utilize the iTunes Cloud concept to store, manage, and access your photo and home video collection.

I would pay for that!

Actually, I already have about $4,000 worth of hardware just to locally store/serve/backup my AV collection, pictures, and a few home videos. And, I am looking at a $250/year service to provide Cloud storage to back this up.

I revise and extend my remark, above:

I would gladly pay for that!
 
Okay, I have a question. Assuming that .mac becomes "push-email" would that mean that while using Apple's Mail app on Mac computer an Email would come in instantly, rather than checking every minute or so? Or does this only apply to the iPhone and the Touch?
 
Speed?

My biggest request for improvement in .mac is the speed. The service upgrades and new features sound nice, but if the iDisk speed isn't improved, it would be a big disappointment.

In most cases, doing anything with iDisk is excruciatingly slow.
 
Actually, it is a "dirty" word. Greed did not create the ipod. You are falsely equating the desire for success with greed. One can certainly be financially successful without being consumed by greed. If you need proof of this concept, look no further than Warren Buffet. Also, corporate greed, such as Apple maintaining huge profit margins is one thing, but personal greed is a whole other beast.

How do you equate "greed" and maintaining "high (you said huge) profit margins"?

Who defines "huge"?

The capitalistic system brings good and bad (iPod and Zune, for example).

But, things like "high profits:ROI" are an incentive that a corporation provides its investors (shareholders).

Without, return, growth, etc. there would be no investors, No Apple, no Apple resellers, fewer jobs, no corporate and individual income taxes for the government (and supposedly the benefit of the people).

In our system (the most successful the world has known), companies are in business to make a profit-- without that there is no company. Profitability is a measure-- in general, better companies are more profitable.

Why is it that Apple, currently realizing 30% profits, after taking risks, complying with stupid regulations (SOX), paying 32% taxes, employee taxes, benefits, etc. is considered "greedy".

You and I, pay 30% taxes-- so we have a profit margin somewhere between 0-70%, Are we greedy?
 
Mobile Me is a fresh and funky name. Miles away from the made up word Macintosh which I always thought was a bit weird.

Er, ah.... it's a kind of apple... Apple misspelled it, that's all?

McIntosh |ˈmakənˌtä sh | (also McIntosh red)
noun
a dessert apple of a variety native to North America, with deep red skin.
ORIGIN late 19th cent.: named after John McIntosh (1777–1845 or 1846), the American-born Canadian farmer on whose farm the apple was discovered as a wild variety.
 
My biggest request for improvement in .mac is the speed. The service upgrades and new features sound nice, but if the iDisk speed isn't improved, it would be a big disappointment.

In most cases, doing anything with iDisk is excruciatingly slow.

Have you ever uploaded things to a website via ftp? Same difference. Your download speeds might be 6mb, but your upload speeds are probably more like 384k. Most people are happy with that kind of bandwidth distribution, but when you start uploading like so many of us are now, it sucks.

Business class dsl or a t1 line, etc. have similar upload and download speeds.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.