Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
OpenAI is a mess from a corporate structure standpoint, and Elon Musk is involved there, whose reputation is at the very least questionable. It could potentially be an unreliable and reputation-damaging partner for Apple.

From this perspective, Google would be a better partner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hans1972 and vjl323
lol why would apple pay them. Google pays them a lot to use google as their default search engine. or at least they used too. they will be providing google so much data :D for their ai
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Jason2000
lol why would apple pay them. Google pays them a lot to use google as their default search engine. or at least they used too. they will be providing google so much data :D for their ai
That's WHY they are paying Google. Because they are not going to be sharing the user data. If they were sharing the user data, it would be way more valuable than $1B, and it would be Google paying Apple-- not the other way around.
 
Last edited:
How dare you infest this thread with a measured reflection based on business realities and facts. This can only be a time to rush to judgement and make wild accusations.
It's very in vogue for one to signal how anti-AI they are these days. I view it simply as a tool to be used or not, based on need and preference. Insanely annoying how everything has to be politicized and turned into a team sport.
 
Like others said, I'll definitely keep it off.

highly skeptical of any Google inclusion —Sony Bravia had a great thing going with AndroidTV ...then came the switch to GoogleTV in '22. The whole experience was ruined, a great smart TV became bloated, slow, and turned into a brick if you didn't login and allow google. Everything is funneled thru Google and their 'required access for features', any autonomy and privacy of the device is gone.
 
Last edited:
If I wanted Google AI on my iPhone I would have just bought a Samsung Galaxy. At this point the most Apple like AI I can get is from Meta since they have hired away most of Apple’s AI talent.
 
In about 5 years, we will all subscribe to a personal AI that will slip in and out of all devices with APIs from the host company. We will get embedded with the personal AI so switching will be difficult.

Apple really screwed things up here in terms of development. All the key players went to Google and then they did this.
 
The question is ...

Will Siri look up to Gemini and decide being educated and geeky is a good thing, or will Gemini look down to Siri - playing in the mud and giggling - and decide that ignorance is bliss?
Definitely Gemini will be the tsukkomi and Siri the boke.
 
  • Love
Reactions: kkclstuff
perfect, then just kill Siri all together and use google assistant as well
 
I wonder why they didn't start with an open-weights model like Google's Gemma or literally any other offering with a permissive license. Suppose it's easier to throw a cool billion at Sundar and have his guys figure out your problems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orange_galoshes
They're way behind and it looks like someone in the company has finally accepted that and decided to just paid Google to get a proven industry frontrunner without some of the weird baggage that OpenAi's chatgpt might bring.
Google and Apple may compete in some areas, but clearly there's a fair amount of professional trust and respect in that business relationship. Sam Altman -- and also Zuckerberg -- are looking to play a much different, zero-sum game, and it's clear neither of them are trustworthy. It makes sense for Apple and Google to partner on this. Google gets to trim a billion off the search engine bill to Apple, Apple gets a temporary boost to get its first-party AI working in early 2026, and both companies make plays to box out Meta and OpenAI from gaining too much marketshare.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.