They did the math. Enough affluent Apple users would pay. Everyone else will buy another brand monitor regardless. Or they're really out of touch and think median income of the US is $300K when in reality it's $47K. Give or take.
The larger iMac will be cheaper than $2500. The current 27-inch iMac starts at $1799. The next one will be close to this. It may be annoyingly more expensive (such as $1999), but not unalienatingly more expensive (such as $2499).Even at $2499, it is costly. The bigger iMac due this year could be cheaper. It might start at $1999.
Or the rumor is wrong. Or the rumor does not tell the whole story.They did the math. Enough affluent Apple users would pay. Everyone else will buy another brand monitor regardless. Or they're really out of touch and think median income of the US is $300K when in reality it's $47K. Give or take.
Nobody even mentioned that this rumored monitor will be a 27-inch model. The price is a rumor. The size is just speculation.Considering the current 24" iMac starts at $1299, I'm not sure how a standalone 27" display is double the price.
Definitely. But when Apple announced the Pro XDR Display at $6000, it was out of the realm of imagination for many consumers.it's a hellofalot more consumer-oriented than a $6k monitor.
That's the problem, though: almost none of those are high-resolution enough for Retina 2x, so you'll probably run them at 1x. But since macOS no longer supports subpixel rendering either, text will look bad.
For all the people complaining here that the price is too high and all they want is a simple monitor : why don't you get a monitor from another brand ? Does it have to be branded "Apple" ? There are plenty of very good quality and well designed monitors out there from many brands, and for very reasonable prices ( even for Pro work).
And they will work with any of your Macs.
It seems many on this site believe (even if they verbally deny it) that Apple owes them something. It also seems many read way too much into vague rumor stories and then treat them as if they are official press releases from Apple.
They really need to ask its long term customers what they want... they'll continue to make far too many wrong decisions otherwise... What was that Macbook Touchbar.. FFS expensive now obsolete gimmick
Or it could just be that we're on a rumour site and people come here to speculate and share their opinions.
wow! that is insane!! I would love the xdr, but i just cannot justify that price. if my wife would ever find out — she'd kill meDefinitely. But when Apple announced the Pro XDR Display at $6000, it was out of the realm of imagination for many consumers.
Here in Brazil, it starts at $9000 (without the stand). The stand costs an additional $1800. You can imagine how unaffordable it felt (and the memes circulating on the Internet!) when Apple announced these prices for a monitor in a country with a GDP per capita of $7000 per year.
Everything in Brazil is a rip-off due to the taxes on imported products.Definitely. But when Apple announced the Pro XDR Display at $6000, it was out of the realm of imagination for many consumers.
Here in Brazil, it starts at $9000 (without the stand). The stand costs an additional $1800. You can imagine how unaffordable it felt (and the memes circulating on the Internet!) when Apple announced these prices for a monitor in a country with a GDP per capita of $7000 per year.
Apple's rumored new consumer-oriented standalone monitor could appear this year and come in at around the $2,500 price mark, based on comments made by Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.
![]()
Writing in his first "Power On" newsletter of 2022, Gurman says the new monitor is "destined to be about half the price of the Pro Display XDR," which he's "hoping" launches sometime this year.
Apple is believed to be developing a lower-priced external monitor that would be sold alongside its high-end Pro Display XDR, which costs $4,999 before factoring in the optional $999 stand.
Taking that into consideration, Gurman's wording suggests he's confident the new display will be somewhere around the $2,500 price mark, although he appears to be less bullish about it being released this year.
Gurman first reported on Apple's development of a standalone display in January 2021, and suggested it will be a consumer-oriented successor to Apple's previous Thunderbolt Display, which was introduced in 2011 for $999 and discontinued in 2016.
In the December edition of his newsletter, Gurman used his Q&A section to double down on his belief that Apple is readying the new display, predicting it would be a "hot seller for those looking to add a larger screen to their new MacBook Pro without spending the equivalent of a luxury car down payment on the Pro Display XDR."
In related rumors, Twitter-based leaker @dylandkt last month claimed LG is developing three new standalone displays that may end up being for Apple, including one based on the current 24-inch iMac, one based on the upcoming 27-inch iMac, and a 32-inch model that may be a new Pro Display XDR with an Apple silicon chip.
In Gurman's latest newsletter, the well-connected journalist also covered his other expectations for new upcoming Apple products in the year ahead, which we've summarized separately.
Article Link: Apple's New Standalone Monitor Could Be Around Half the Price of the Pro Display XDR
That is wrong. It happened many times before. Just take a look at many threads in this forum...To paraphrase Winston Churchill...
Never before, in the history of mankind, have so many, whined so much, about so little...
Yeah, many people do. It is a rumor, not a fact. And, if the rumor makes little sense, it may either be wrong or not tell the whole story.I think my post was pretty clear that I'm not talking about people like you. I'm talking about the ones who talk as if it's fact, not speculation, and then get indignant about it ?
That is wrong. It happened many times before. Just take a look at many threads in this forum...
Because Apple sells other computers; not just iMacs. When using a laptop on your desk, it helps to have a good larger, external monitor.I doubt Apple will release a monitor just for the users who want an additional one for the iMac. Apple's approach is to assume that customers will use the iMac's integrated monitor and nothing else. If someone wants to add another monitor, then it is entirely up to them.
Because Apple sells other computers; not just iMacs. When using a laptop on your desk, it helps to have a good larger, external monitor.
A high end display like the XDR is overkill and too expensive for consumers/prosumers and for many pros where more resolution and screen size is needed but not a color-corrected, reference monitor.
The cheap 4K monitors are not really the right resolution for cleanly displaying text at the 27-32" size. you really need around 5K for that and the only option for 5K is kind of a crappy monitor.
A $2500 monitor just seems too high for what people actually want. that puts it into the higher end range. A 27" at <$2000 price point would work for a lot more customers. I'd be fine with just a good IPS monitor without the miniLED and high refresh bells & whistles if the price was closer to the current LG price.
The front? Sure. This monitor is 99% plastic though, cannot be compared to the XDR. And the Pro Display's cheese grater design is quite unique and reduces weight, while allowing for passive cooling (since it's miniLED it needs to be cooled)