Rush it? Really?So, you'd rather rush a design and retain hundreds of users, rather than "getting it right" and add millions of new ones, right?
Sounds like a plan...
[doublepost=1545229167][/doublepost]
5 Years is actually not long at all for a manufacturer to "change course" (again).
[doublepost=1545229212][/doublepost]
You'd be amazed...
The iMac Pro still presents a challenge for hardware upgrades:Who’s even buying them these days? For the money, may as well get an iMac Pro.
Mac Pro will eventually be replaced by Mac Mini + eGPU.
What this video clearly shows is that the design of the Mac mini is absolutely solid; but someone needs to yell at the Contract Manufacturer!According to Quinn Nelson from Snazzy Labs the new Mac mini is also out of the gate in a "thermal corner":
Yes. A year after going back to the drawing board is "rushing it" for a new product design. It's actually probably pretty close to done now, and has started the long process of going through Agency Approvals in a bunch of different countries.Rush it? Really?
That's like "So when did you stop beating your wife?" It's a question specifically and disingenuously designed to have no "good answer".So you’re a pro, and feel like Apple don’t give a **** about you.
I’m a consumer and Apple doesn’t give a **** about me.
Exactly who is their target market these days?
I know, I know. Apple would have been oh so much more successful with you at the helm!The way Apple has... is handling this Mac Pro situation is by far the biggest disgrace in post-Sculley Apple history. Massive, dark shame on all upper management responsible for this.
So, you'd rather rush a design and retain hundreds of users, rather than "getting it right" and add millions of new ones, right?
Offtopic much?Yep. Same for the MacBook Pro. There is nobody editing photos and movies or creating websites and apps cordless. The weight and height of my 2012 non-retina MBP is perfect. Yes it’s twice as thick as the current ones and yes it is heavier but that doesn’t matter. It itsn’t too thick or heavy. The only reason I need a laptop is to quickly give a demo in another room or do some small things while abroad. 95% of the time my MBP is just attached to a screen on my desk. For pro work abroad you’ll need a huge battery. If I really would use my work’s 2017 MacBook Pro while abroad the battery is dead within 90 minutes.
I have absolutely no idea at what point Apple became clueless and tried reinventing the Mac Pro wheel. If it’s not broken, don’t fix it. I wouldn’t mind a slight, modernized revision to the cheese grater design to bring it more current, all while leaving the inside mostly the same. That’s all they should have done. And this BS they have going on with NVIDIA is also annoying. I fear Apple’s heads may be lodged so far up their arses that there’s no hope of them being able to remove them at this point. I’m afraid of what “modular” means to them. The cheese grater was plenty modular. My fear is their use of “modular” in some chic “new Apple” sense in which they try to reinvent the wheel again. The trash can was a travesty. Apple has all the talent they need to be big in the pro market, but they’re so blindly pre-occupied with the mobile market that it’s all they seem to care about now. They could give Google a run for their money if they offered an alternative to Chromebooks for education ... but it seems apparent all they care about is money and less about changing the world the way Jobs always envisioned it. Apple makes a lot of money, but Apple’s potential for various markets is being wasted and unused.All this Apple talk about 'Modular' worries me a lot. What modularity does Apple need to invent that the PC industry doesn't already offer in the workstation market. Modularity is there in components. You know, the ability to very easily adding a few sticks of extra Ram, extra storage in the way of large capacity 7200RPM drives, 2 or high end nVidia GPUs.
I fear Apple's interpretation of this 'modularity' will serve Apple first and the customers a very distant second.
I cannot wait for the new modular Mac Pro. It's the #1 product that I've been wanting for the last two years, more than any other electronic or non-electronic device. The next Apple event can't come soon enough!
That's where you're mistaken: "PC" manufacturers haven't come out with a truly new model since the early 1990s!!! They just keep putting the same old Intel reference designs into new metal/plastic and call it "New".And yet, PC manufacturers come out with new models every year. What is it that you think Apple needs 5 years to "get right"?
In case you weren't noticing, most people here would be happy with something that isn't designed more for an art museum than someones desk. It's not rocket science to design together the latest technology into something that "just works".
And you really think that after waiting (more than 5 years) that Apple's newest Mac Pro (with prices starting at $3000) will attract MILLIONS of new buyers? HAHAHAHA!!!!
I give you a thumbs-up for the clever graphic. Other than that, not so much.Sneak Peak...
View attachment 811565
(After Ives gets his hands on it... I know - too many buttons... whoops. And not 1, but 2 optical drives? What was I thinking.)
I'm waiting with great curiosity to see what Apple comes up with for the re-think on this product. It's good they've admitted the failings of the current model... though from what I've seen coming out of Apple, I don't expect this to actually be a straight forward "result!".
That's where you're mistaken: "PC" manufacturers haven't come out with a truly new model since the early 1990s!!! They just keep putting the same old Intel reference designs into new metal/plastic and call it "New".
Yeah, that's "engineering", all right...
There's that ol' MacRumors optimism I've grown to know and love!Kids who like different coloured phones and spend their entire lives on social media!?
We've been saying for years that Apple just needed to use the old Classic Mac Pro design and upgrade the internals...but there's a snowball's chance in hell that they're going to do that. They'll bugger up the design once again, of that I have no doubt.
That's where you're mistaken: "PC" manufacturers haven't come out with a truly new model since the early 1990s!!! They just keep putting the same old Intel reference designs into new metal/plastic and call it "New".
Yeah, that's "engineering", all right...
And Pros would be ecstatic if Apple did that is the point ...That's where you're mistaken: "PC" manufacturers haven't come out with a truly new model since the early 1990s!!! They just keep putting the same old Intel reference designs into new metal/plastic and call it "New".
Yeah, that's "engineering", all right...
Actually, the "innovation" is exactly the same pace as it ever was for those guys!Individual components have gone through innovation, but the basic motherboard, power, and PCI slot interface has remained. Some case manufacturers have created fantastic and usable cases like Apple had. I have one. The M2 interface for SSD storage is another innovation. I do get your overall point, though. Not trying to trash it. The innovation isn’t anywhere near the pace it used to be.
Individual components have gone through innovation, but the basic motherboard, power, and PCI slot interface has remained. Some case manufacturers have created fantastic and usable cases like Apple had. I have one. The M2 interface for SSD storage is another innovation. I do get your overall point, though. Not trying to trash it. The innovation isn’t anywhere near the pace it used to be.