A 34” and 43” would require much higher resolutions than the Pro Display XDR to be high PPI for monitor usage aligning with what Apple accommodates (218PPI, 2 DPR)
You’re sacrificing a lot of PPI with such sizes which is within your right.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple's Pro Display XDR Is Five Years Old Today
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
You’re sacrificing a lot of PPI with such sizes which is within your right.
Well I may be a "typical Apple user". The "user" part anyway and I have a XDR, which is just great connected to my M1 studio ultra. I got it because I could afford it and I am very glad I have it.
The Pro Art displays have much nicer specs. Again the problem is MacOS scaling which is don’t intentionally. Anyone with a real computer can run a 4K monitor at any size without problems except on MacOS.
Look at the materials. Take some money to design it which is required when you’re selling as $6k monitor. At Apple’s économises of scale you would be shocked how much they can make each one for after the initial design costs. Super low. And aluminum is not a premium material except compared to plastic. Aluminum damages easily as it’s soft and it’s just some recycled soda cans. The thing that makes me laugh is all the people that thing it’s somehow expensive. Look up the price of aluminum - so make your block of aluminum and then machine it down and you have about $30 worth of soda cans there. Call it aerospace grade or whatever else you want - aluminum is very abundant and inexpensive. It’s not premium unless you’re comparing the feel to plastic.
The rear side is just as awesome. The cheese grater pattern is top tier! Might order a second one…
Dell is already releasing Tandem OLED options of 16” and 18” at CES.
There’s always trade-offs with high-end monitor tech. Using less displays at once with the trade off being the use of a 32” 6K+ @ 120hz monitor is more than worth it for many (a common trade-off with highest end monitors and the bandwidth they demand regardless).
And Apple literally has the Vision Pro as an option to minimize
…Regardless there isn’t monitors with what the Pro Display XDR offers as well built, minimal, and quiet.
There’s absolutely a design premium for that other monitor manufacturers have not bothered meeting and surpassing.
The market is the market; it is what it is.
There’s absolutely a design premium for that other monitor manufacturers have not bothered meeting and surpassing.
The market is the market; it is what it is.
Just because you can buy aluminum (cans or otherwise) for cheap, doesn't mean engineers are free, tooling/machining is free, testing is free, product packaging is free... or anywhere close to $99.
Especially when you factor in 'initial design costs'.
For the price it’s less than impressive. It is beautiful engineered but a grand for the stand? Cook is such a greedy sod. And it fringes very noticeably at the edges so not great for DTP.
This is a comically absurd comment.
I posted a list of monitor stands for $99 that probably sell 100-1000x amount of what Apple sells yet they are made from even cheaper materials like plastic and steel. You have no idea what you're talking about.
On the other hand, you’re still using worse PPI than I had 10 years ago. ⚖️
That’s the problem with big monitors. No the manufacturer cares about PPI as much as Apple.
You're still on your mission.
The XDR is for a niche of which you are not a part. Just accept that.
There are damn few 6K monitors out there, and the XDR is a high quality standard outside of lab equipment.
You don't need to be professional to see that display tech evolved a lot during these five years, which means that value proposition of Pro Display XDR has degraded significantly.
Just like you don't need to be an enthusiast to feel ripped off by paying $200 for 256 -> 512gb storage upgrade.
Someone who *really needs* what it offers that other displays don't offer. If I was a professional photographer and my living depended on my results, I would get one ASAP. Or, if I had the $$$$ and just wanted an outstanding display.
Fortunately, my Apple Studio Display meets my needs as a serious photographer just fine.
Last edited:
Combined with atrociously bad non-functioning "retina" scaling in macOS, the PPI number is the WORST spec of Apple displays, and a primary reason to avoid them.
Same pixel density as a small laptop screen, but located much farther from your eyes, meaning you can't see *** unless you smash your face into the display.
Either it should be 4K 27" / 5K 32", or Apple must fix scaling algorithm in macOS, which has been broken since 2012.
You may feel like it because it's been on the market for so long but even now there is still nothing that could compete directly with the Pro Display XDR combination of resolution and image quality.
Apple's update cycle is all over the place, the only certain thing is the iPhone and Watch in September and Macbook Pros in October/November.
You have to really love pixel peeping.
I bought one and the stand.
Absolutely love it.
The next version will be insane with TB 5.
I think I will probably sit that one out, however.
This thing is a tank and I imagine it will last a good while.
Thanks for the analogy. Apple Displays are the Lambos / Bugattis of the Monitor world. I will concede that they aren't for everyone. However, I assert they are overkill for just about everyone too.
They are definitely worth it for professionals in creative endeavors where one needs to be fussy about color and uniformity.
I believe that's a very small percentage of Apple's 1 billion active users.
Pro Display XDR does 1000 nits sustained brightness / 1600 nits peak. HDR video can have highlights up to 10000 nits. So it's not overkill enough
Modern upper-range TVs are able to hit 2000 nits highlights already.