Ludicrous to suggest that a building move is responsible for lack of innovation, executive arrogance/ignorance and an erosion of customer trust and a weak product line. Why would it affect staff so much? It shouldn't affect the leadership at all, they are paid handsomely to run the business and a spot of building work would not distract world class management (which they are clearly not).
[doublepost=1480723682][/doublepost]
Yup, they have moved every product line into a dead end. The last media event really underlined how weak Apple have become. A competent, confident company would have addressed the mountain of growing criticism by launching some great product changes as an FU to the nay-sayers. Instead we got the touch bar, nothing else, just the touch bar. Meanwhile calendar gets spammed, batteries get recalls, "touch disease" is dismissed as our fault and Cook keeps spouting on about the great future and his own political agenda. Very sad.
Their present offices are stunting apples growth and productivity.
Apple have out grown their present offices and they have even had to rent interim offices:
http://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Inside-Apple-s-massive-Bay-Area-expansion-6773064.php
A company is only as good as its staff - clearly present offices are 'not fit for purpose'.
The new Mothership will make a big difference in many ways least of all from a psychological view point.
https://www.theguardian.com/sustain...etty-views-employees-productive?client=safari