I WAS SHOCKED! I was like "What the heck do they WANT?! Then this morning I was like ahhhhhhh lolI remember people losing it over the 2% dip yesterday.
I WAS SHOCKED! I was like "What the heck do they WANT?! Then this morning I was like ahhhhhhh lolI remember people losing it over the 2% dip yesterday.
You think OpenAI is doing it for the exposure? haha. They're the hottest thing in tech right now and they're already giving limited free use of chatgpt. They don't need more exposure. They need funding. Altman wants to raise 7 trillions(!) to get to AGI.I don’t believe there is any money being exchanged — both companies benefit — Apple for offloading some [user initiated] requests, and OpenAI for having some integration into an OS that powers 2B+ devices.
Right. Notice how some of the most consistent naysayers about everything Apple are conspicuously absent today.Impossible! I was assured by the forum economists and business experts who know how to run Apple better than Tim Cook that the company was doomed!
Yes, I think OpenAI wants the exposure of incorporation into iOS. And they are not the “hottest thing in tech” — that is ridiculous. What do you base this off — number of users or revenue? From my limited research, they have less than 200m users, of which there only about 4m that are paying — not big numbers, relatively speaking. If they want to raise more money, they need to scale massively. Having their service available to iOS users gives them more visibility, and potentially converts them to paying customers. Also, keep in mind that they have well funded competitors nipping at their heels.You think OpenAI is doing it for the exposure? haha. They're the hottest thing in tech right now and they're already giving limited free use of chatgpt. They don't need more exposure. They need funding. Altman wants to raise 7 trillions(!) to get to AGI.
They're going to give the 3rd richest company in the world and eventual competitor a free lunch? Apple needs them way more than they need Apple. Unless Apple is selling out its users for their data (99.9% not happening), Apple is paying OpenAI. How much, we'll find out in like 10 years, if ever.
I mean, if you want to get into bed with a conman go for it.You think OpenAI is doing it for the exposure? haha. They're the hottest thing in tech right now and they're already giving limited free use of chatgpt. They don't need more exposure. They need funding. Altman wants to raise 7 trillions(!) to get to AGI.
They're going to give the 3rd richest company in the world and eventual competitor a free lunch? Apple needs them way more than they need Apple. Unless Apple is selling out its users for their data (99.9% not happening), Apple is paying OpenAI. How much, we'll find out in like 10 years, if ever.
Yes, that’s what the “experts” said.But people said on social media that it was the worst WWDC ever, how is it possible?
I'd like to take your word for it, but it would be better to share a screenshot of the actual setting showing it.
What new deal for the Apple Card?I didn't read the thread yet...
I don't think it went up due to the keynote. I was watching the stock the whole keynote and it was down the whole time. After the keynote ended, and the rest of the day, it was still down the same. After hours, it was also down slightly from the close.
If it was AI stuff, there was nothing that changed between last night and today.
I think it was possibly the new payment deal for the Apple Card? Thoughts?
I think many people watched the keynote later in the evening, then watched Dan Ives, Jim Cramer, and other analysts go nuts over the Apple announcements and the upcoming iPhone super cycle, and then got up the next morning and started buying. Maybe.What new deal for the Apple Card?
I think OpenAI is painfully aware of the fact that for all their technological advancements, they are ultimately just another app on your iPhone. I suspect what Apple is offering them is access to their user base. Not user data, but the opportunity to convert some of them into paid subscribers, and to maintain mindshare amongst its users.You think OpenAI is doing it for the exposure? haha. They're the hottest thing in tech right now and they're already giving limited free use of chatgpt. They don't need more exposure. They need funding. Altman wants to raise 7 trillions(!) to get to AGI.
They're going to give the 3rd richest company in the world and eventual competitor a free lunch? Apple needs them way more than they need Apple. Unless Apple is selling out its users for their data (99.9% not happening), Apple is paying OpenAI. How much, we'll find out in like 10 years, if ever.
Ah yeah, but who is actually going to be buying a high power Mac for gaming, which has zero upgradeable parts, and costs a fortune, when they can build a gaming PC for much much cheaper, and with 100% upgradeable parts, sourced from any cheap parts shop? It doesn't matter if ALL games work on Mac, the user base simply isn't going to choose Apple's profit model over an PC that is upgradeable with parts that are 1/8th the cost of Apple's RAM/SSD prices. It ain't happening. All that bringing AAA games to Mac will achieve, is giving casual gamers the option of running them on their existing Macs.I’m ngl. I think Apple has the branding down. “Apple Intelligence” takes away the corporate feel of ‘AI’ and the tagline “AI for the rest of us” is smart. Also the fact that it’s opt-in is amazingly smart. Now we just need to see the execution's of the AI itself. Or I should say, Siri 2.0.
Personally, I think the underreported fact that GPTK2 has AVX support is enough to buy some stock cause that could significantly improve Mac Gaming
Maybe not in your company, but MS has some large adoption cases for Copilot,I think you'll find once the dust has settled that Wall Street will not expect *profit* from AI in the industry. It's years away from recouping the capital costs the likes of Meta, OpenAI, and Microsoft have pumped into it with no better suggestions than "people will surely pay for this" (hint: no, at scale they absolutely will not. Our MS reps are getting desperate in trying to foist it onto subscribers to the point I genuinely feel bad for them).
At the end, every company is an app in an iPhone. What is interesting, if the rumors are true, Apple is the one who approached OpenAI. It's clear that OpenAI is the leader in the market, and Apple needs them. Also, there are no consequences of turning them down, considering that Apple will add other AI models to their devices.I think OpenAI is painfully aware of the fact that for all their technological advancements, they are ultimately just another app on your iPhone. I suspect what Apple is offering them is access to their user base. Not user data, but the opportunity to convert some of them into paid subscribers, and to maintain mindshare amongst its users.
They are also aware that the consequences of them turning Apple down is that Apple then approaches another LLM like Google's Gemini and makes that the preinstalled default across all Apple devices and they then lose out not because they had the worst product, but because hundreds of millions of users find it more convenient to use a competing service that's directly integrated into their voice assistant vs manually launching an app. Think about how you can only use Siri on your Apple Watch.
It's quite similar to Google paying Apple to keep their search engine default in safari. Maybe Apple does need Google more, but Google would rather continue to pay Apple than risk "screwing around and finding out". This is really Apple's true power - the ability to commoditise every business in the industry by pitting them against one another.
I suspect Apple has been successful in leveraging their billion-strong install base to come to a more favourable arrangement with OpenAI than most people would give Apple credit for. They likely aren't paying OpenAI anything. Meanwhile, Microsoft is probably like "Bloody...I am paying OpenAI so much money just so they can go and help prop up Apple's ecosystem?!?"
I think OpenAI is satisfied with the iOS integration, but they do not need it for exposure. ChatGPT has the record for fastest-growing user base in history, and they did it without Apple help. I'm not sure the integration with Apple devices will result in more paying customers.Yes, I think OpenAI wants the exposure of incorporation into iOS. And they are not the “hottest thing in tech” — that is ridiculous. What do you base this off — number of users or revenue? From my limited research, they have less than 200m users, of which there only about 4m that are paying — not big numbers, relatively speaking. If they want to raise more money, they need to scale massively. Having their service available to iOS users gives them more visibility, and potentially converts them to paying customers. Also, keep in mind that they have well funded competitors nipping at their heels.
And hopefully you have the latest hardware so it can make sense for your use case. Does anyone know if the iPhone 15 and 15 Plus will get Apple Intelligence? If the answer is yes, I’m curious how Apple will spin it explaining how the 15 with an A16 gets it while my 14 Pro with the same A16 does not.Apple Intelligence is going to be the “AI” that most normal people use day to day, and from what I saw during the presentation yesterday, a lot of it is simple and makes sense for it’s use case.
And hopefully you have the latest hardware so it can make sense for your use case. Does anyone know if the iPhone 15 and 15 Plus will get Apple Intelligence? If the answer is yes, I’m curious how Apple will spin it explaining how the 15 with an A16 gets it while my 14 Pro with the same A16 does not.