Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don’t believe there is any money being exchanged — both companies benefit — Apple for offloading some [user initiated] requests, and OpenAI for having some integration into an OS that powers 2B+ devices.
You think OpenAI is doing it for the exposure? haha. They're the hottest thing in tech right now and they're already giving limited free use of chatgpt. They don't need more exposure. They need funding. Altman wants to raise 7 trillions(!) to get to AGI.

They're going to give the 3rd richest company in the world and eventual competitor a free lunch? Apple needs them way more than they need Apple. Unless Apple is selling out its users for their data (99.9% not happening), Apple is paying OpenAI. How much, we'll find out in like 10 years, if ever.
 
  • Love
Reactions: wilhoitm
You think OpenAI is doing it for the exposure? haha. They're the hottest thing in tech right now and they're already giving limited free use of chatgpt. They don't need more exposure. They need funding. Altman wants to raise 7 trillions(!) to get to AGI.

They're going to give the 3rd richest company in the world and eventual competitor a free lunch? Apple needs them way more than they need Apple. Unless Apple is selling out its users for their data (99.9% not happening), Apple is paying OpenAI. How much, we'll find out in like 10 years, if ever.
Yes, I think OpenAI wants the exposure of incorporation into iOS. And they are not the “hottest thing in tech” — that is ridiculous. What do you base this off — number of users or revenue? From my limited research, they have less than 200m users, of which there only about 4m that are paying — not big numbers, relatively speaking. If they want to raise more money, they need to scale massively. Having their service available to iOS users gives them more visibility, and potentially converts them to paying customers. Also, keep in mind that they have well funded competitors nipping at their heels.
 
You think OpenAI is doing it for the exposure? haha. They're the hottest thing in tech right now and they're already giving limited free use of chatgpt. They don't need more exposure. They need funding. Altman wants to raise 7 trillions(!) to get to AGI.

They're going to give the 3rd richest company in the world and eventual competitor a free lunch? Apple needs them way more than they need Apple. Unless Apple is selling out its users for their data (99.9% not happening), Apple is paying OpenAI. How much, we'll find out in like 10 years, if ever.
I mean, if you want to get into bed with a conman go for it.

Back here in reality, AGI is never going to happen unless a breakthrough in consciousness (or power generation for that matter) is discovered….but it sure as hell not going to spawn from feeding ever more data into language models 😂
 
Last edited:
I didn't read the thread yet...

I don't think it went up due to the keynote. I was watching the stock the whole keynote and it was down the whole time. After the keynote ended, and the rest of the day, it was still down the same. After hours, it was also down slightly from the close.

If it was AI stuff, there was nothing that changed between last night and today.

I think it was possibly the new payment deal for the Apple Card? Thoughts?
 
I didn't read the thread yet...

I don't think it went up due to the keynote. I was watching the stock the whole keynote and it was down the whole time. After the keynote ended, and the rest of the day, it was still down the same. After hours, it was also down slightly from the close.

If it was AI stuff, there was nothing that changed between last night and today.

I think it was possibly the new payment deal for the Apple Card? Thoughts?
What new deal for the Apple Card?
 
What new deal for the Apple Card?
I think many people watched the keynote later in the evening, then watched Dan Ives, Jim Cramer, and other analysts go nuts over the Apple announcements and the upcoming iPhone super cycle, and then got up the next morning and started buying. Maybe.
 
I would have a lot of money right now if I had had enough money back then. Maybe I’m doing alright in a parallel universe somewhere? Oh well! Sigh!
 
You think OpenAI is doing it for the exposure? haha. They're the hottest thing in tech right now and they're already giving limited free use of chatgpt. They don't need more exposure. They need funding. Altman wants to raise 7 trillions(!) to get to AGI.

They're going to give the 3rd richest company in the world and eventual competitor a free lunch? Apple needs them way more than they need Apple. Unless Apple is selling out its users for their data (99.9% not happening), Apple is paying OpenAI. How much, we'll find out in like 10 years, if ever.
I think OpenAI is painfully aware of the fact that for all their technological advancements, they are ultimately just another app on your iPhone. I suspect what Apple is offering them is access to their user base. Not user data, but the opportunity to convert some of them into paid subscribers, and to maintain mindshare amongst its users.

They are also aware that the consequences of them turning Apple down is that Apple then approaches another LLM like Google's Gemini and makes that the preinstalled default across all Apple devices and they then lose out not because they had the worst product, but because hundreds of millions of users find it more convenient to use a competing service that's directly integrated into their voice assistant vs manually launching an app. Think about how you can only use Siri on your Apple Watch.

It's quite similar to Google paying Apple to keep their search engine default in safari. Maybe Apple does need Google more, but Google would rather continue to pay Apple than risk "screwing around and finding out". This is really Apple's true power - the ability to commoditise every business in the industry by pitting them against one another.

I suspect Apple has been successful in leveraging their billion-strong install base to come to a more favourable arrangement with OpenAI than most people would give Apple credit for. They likely aren't paying OpenAI anything. Meanwhile, Microsoft is probably like "Bloody...I am paying OpenAI so much money just so they can go and help prop up Apple's ecosystem?!?"
 
"Apple's stock price would be over $45,000 today if it had never been split"

Note that stock charts take into account the spit(s). Apple stock initially traded at $22, but charts show this as $0.10 to reflect he spits.
 
  • Love
Reactions: wilhoitm
I’m ngl. I think Apple has the branding down. “Apple Intelligence” takes away the corporate feel of ‘AI’ and the tagline “AI for the rest of us” is smart. Also the fact that it’s opt-in is amazingly smart. Now we just need to see the execution's of the AI itself. Or I should say, Siri 2.0.

Personally, I think the underreported fact that GPTK2 has AVX support is enough to buy some stock cause that could significantly improve Mac Gaming
Ah yeah, but who is actually going to be buying a high power Mac for gaming, which has zero upgradeable parts, and costs a fortune, when they can build a gaming PC for much much cheaper, and with 100% upgradeable parts, sourced from any cheap parts shop? It doesn't matter if ALL games work on Mac, the user base simply isn't going to choose Apple's profit model over an PC that is upgradeable with parts that are 1/8th the cost of Apple's RAM/SSD prices. It ain't happening. All that bringing AAA games to Mac will achieve, is giving casual gamers the option of running them on their existing Macs.

Counter to my own argument, is the possibility of playing FPV games with a high quality 3D vision, which will make games such as racing games actually realistic, as the inability to judge distance with 2D is a major reality killer. Counter to that counter, is all it will take is a non-Apple brand to make a similarly high quality 3D headset, and the ball is back in PC's court.
 
As a small time Apple stock holder since 2013, I notice that it normally drops right after product and software announcements, I am very pleased that it went up $14.03 per share today! Warren Buffet must be ecstatic.
 
At the end of the day its all speculation proof will be in the sales of devices this year. What does everyone think?

My thoughts, it will be pending on initial feedback on the AI on the devices but is this enough to push people to upgrade to Pro or super refresh cycle of new base devices end of year that have chips that can handle AI? To counter that people might now hold off refreshing their device until a base compatible version comes out. As well is it enough to offset the decline of sales in China? Also I dont see apple seeing an increase in Ipad sales and quite possibly macbooks given current models are solid and IpadOs is still Ipados and there will be fierce competition with the Snapdragon chips for PCs users to not crossover. So ultimately my opinion it will come down to strong sales growth of iphones for the price to be sustainable. Keen to hear others thoughts?
 
Last edited:
I think you'll find once the dust has settled that Wall Street will not expect *profit* from AI in the industry. It's years away from recouping the capital costs the likes of Meta, OpenAI, and Microsoft have pumped into it with no better suggestions than "people will surely pay for this" (hint: no, at scale they absolutely will not. Our MS reps are getting desperate in trying to foist it onto subscribers to the point I genuinely feel bad for them).
Maybe not in your company, but MS has some large adoption cases for Copilot,

The Coca-Cola Company and Microsoft announce five-year strategic partnership to accelerate cloud and generative AI initiatives - Stories
Hitachi and Microsoft enter milestone agreement to accelerate business and social innovation with generative AI - Stories
Creating internal solutions at a global level: Grupo Bimbo adopts AI to empower its workforce – Microsoft News Center Canada

Microsoft has a strong presence in the enterprise sector, and Copilot goes beyond mere "better suggestions". It integrates with MS Office applications, Teams, Dynamics ERP, GitHub, and security services. Additionally, OpenAI can be utilized as a service on Azure. These are areas where Microsoft's AI offer a superior experience compared to Apple AI.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1Peace
I think OpenAI is painfully aware of the fact that for all their technological advancements, they are ultimately just another app on your iPhone. I suspect what Apple is offering them is access to their user base. Not user data, but the opportunity to convert some of them into paid subscribers, and to maintain mindshare amongst its users.

They are also aware that the consequences of them turning Apple down is that Apple then approaches another LLM like Google's Gemini and makes that the preinstalled default across all Apple devices and they then lose out not because they had the worst product, but because hundreds of millions of users find it more convenient to use a competing service that's directly integrated into their voice assistant vs manually launching an app. Think about how you can only use Siri on your Apple Watch.

It's quite similar to Google paying Apple to keep their search engine default in safari. Maybe Apple does need Google more, but Google would rather continue to pay Apple than risk "screwing around and finding out". This is really Apple's true power - the ability to commoditise every business in the industry by pitting them against one another.

I suspect Apple has been successful in leveraging their billion-strong install base to come to a more favourable arrangement with OpenAI than most people would give Apple credit for. They likely aren't paying OpenAI anything. Meanwhile, Microsoft is probably like "Bloody...I am paying OpenAI so much money just so they can go and help prop up Apple's ecosystem?!?"
At the end, every company is an app in an iPhone. What is interesting, if the rumors are true, Apple is the one who approached OpenAI. It's clear that OpenAI is the leader in the market, and Apple needs them. Also, there are no consequences of turning them down, considering that Apple will add other AI models to their devices.

Apple Likely to Add Google Gemini and Other AI Models to iOS 18 - MacRumors

Second, this is very different from the Google Search case. AI infrastructure is very expensive to acquire and maintain, and I don't think OpenAI will pay Apple or let use their service for free, but I could be wrong. Maybe the agreement details will surface later.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I think OpenAI wants the exposure of incorporation into iOS. And they are not the “hottest thing in tech” — that is ridiculous. What do you base this off — number of users or revenue? From my limited research, they have less than 200m users, of which there only about 4m that are paying — not big numbers, relatively speaking. If they want to raise more money, they need to scale massively. Having their service available to iOS users gives them more visibility, and potentially converts them to paying customers. Also, keep in mind that they have well funded competitors nipping at their heels.
I think OpenAI is satisfied with the iOS integration, but they do not need it for exposure. ChatGPT has the record for fastest-growing user base in history, and they did it without Apple help. I'm not sure the integration with Apple devices will result in more paying customers.

I also think this will be different from Google agreement, and I don't see OpenAI paying Apple or using their service for free. We will have to wait for the details of the agreements to become public.
 
Last edited:
Apple Intelligence is going to be the “AI” that most normal people use day to day, and from what I saw during the presentation yesterday, a lot of it is simple and makes sense for it’s use case.
And hopefully you have the latest hardware so it can make sense for your use case. Does anyone know if the iPhone 15 and 15 Plus will get Apple Intelligence? If the answer is yes, I’m curious how Apple will spin it explaining how the 15 with an A16 gets it while my 14 Pro with the same A16 does not.
 
And hopefully you have the latest hardware so it can make sense for your use case. Does anyone know if the iPhone 15 and 15 Plus will get Apple Intelligence? If the answer is yes, I’m curious how Apple will spin it explaining how the 15 with an A16 gets it while my 14 Pro with the same A16 does not.

My understanding is that only the 15 pro will get Apple intelligence, supporting the theory that you need at least 8 gb of ram to make use of it.
 
While many speculate that Apple’s stock is rising due to vapor demos of AI software that won’t be in beta for a few months, it might be helpful to notice that:

1. The World Bank released a report on Tuesday indicating that the world economy is stronger than predicted, driven by a US economy growing faster than expected.

2. The press reports that iPhone sales in China, which recently have been poor due to stiff competition, have rebounded as Apple has dropped prices.

While it is possible that a significant portion of Apple’s recent spike is due to WWDC announcements and the market’s animal spirits, Wall Street is also considering the two points above.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kc9hzn
What's The big deal tough, because they know Tim will make everyone upgrade their devices to use AI??? LoL
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.