Doubt it. The desktop paradigm does not work with a tablet interface. The fiasco of the 90's era PenMac still haunts the halls in Cupertino.
----------
penmac?
Why so long?
It's just a sheet of paper with an Apple sticker on it...
Edit: I found a leaked image:
Image
I would upvote this 1000 times if I could. I'm just glad Safari didn't crash while replying like it would in 8.1.1 nearly every time I tried typing into a web form.I just want Apple hardware and software that works. Not thinner, not a rush job and burning the candle at both ends: just a smooth working product as I had before Mavericks/iPhone 6/iOS 8.
Well, it makes sense to me, and also some other people as well. It all depends on your needs. It's just the right size for my international travel, and it's still big enough for me to do real work - either creating presentations on it directly, or connecting via VPN to my Linux work machine.The 11" is the one that doesn't make sense to me.
The current gen MacBook Air is already thin enough.
Was 11" too small and 13" too big for some people?
Until you look back in 10 years and say WOW! that 2014 MacBook Air seemed so thin but it was really quite thick.
The original iPhone was thin in its day too but by today's standards its a brick. I'd never buy the 2007 iPhone in 2014.
I would agree at some point a product can become too thin -- where it looses too much functionality for the sake of aesthetics. I'm not sure the Air is at that point yet, but also not sure how much thinner Apple can make it given the size of a regular USB port (goes back to my functionality point -- a thiner machine requiring dongles is a setback, not advancement IMHO). I think fast, reliable, secure wireless connectivity to peripherals is the key to making thinner computers. Then optional dongles on consumer devices like the Air become more acceptable.
I expect the 11" and 13" Air's to be phased out by middle of year with this model.
Both would be cool. But where would the antenna cables and iSite camera go? Without EMI shielding might be hard to run across back of LED.
I expect the 11" and 13" Air's to be phased out by middle of year with this model.
Was 11" too small and 13" too big for some people?
i'm really not liking the idea of an even thinner/smaller macbook air. 13" is the lowest i'll go for a screen on a laptop. and the macbook air is already thin as it is.
the small size of the air is already compromising the quality of other parts. the body creaks and makes noises when you handle it. also the keys are cheap ass plastic that break after not even a week of using. macbook pros aren't as bad. they feel more solid and well build.
Gold....
Really?!?!?
How utterly gauche.....![]()
Yeah just what we need a thinner MacBook Air. Of course there will be no room for connecting peripherals ...you will have to use the Jedi mind trick in order to connect any USB device.![]()
If it gets much thinner they're going to lose the USB ports..
What does ultra thin mean? It can only be as thin as the I/O will allow.
The 11" is the one that doesn't make sense to me. Too large to cary around unless you have a bag. And once you have a bag, there is little point in not carrying a 13" and getting much more screen real estate. Also price difference between the two is trivial. .