Do you wear glasses? If Apple gets this light enough, I could see myself wearing one. But I already need to wear glasses when doing anything that requires any reading, so it isn't such a big leap to go from regular glasses to smart glasses.No I don’t.
The primary issue with it is that you wear it on your FACE. I get that you and others don’t think that’s an issue. But it is. A HUGE ONE.
Not at all, but I'd go out of my way to avoid people like you.So you’re a shut-in who doesn’t value real life experiences? Good for you. Enjoy your isolating face toy.
What if the headset was comfortable enough to wear all day? And the battery pack light enough to have strapped to your waist all day? Then the only setup you need to do is hook up the cable to connect the two, which would take about as much time/effort as putting on wired earphones.Not to mention that it sounds cumbersome to need to set up the headset, cable and battery pack every time you want to use it. The opposite of ‘it just works’.
Except, Tons of people said the storage space was too small (*"less space than a nomad, lame")..And iPod: "Who asked for a thousand songs in your pocket?"
When Apple introduces something, they are pretty polished, even for the first time.
Yeah and it took 3 to 4 generations before anything other than the phone part worked right! Not even App Store for the first year!So many people said that when the iPhone premiered
Because the software for it was written for the Glasses, and they couldn't build them. They built this device to demo the software, and Tim said ship it...which has the whole company freaking out.Here is what we know so far:
So, how is this the next iPhone?
- It's difficult to manufacture
- Software has been difficult to tailor for it
- Many executives seem to doubt market penetration and success
- Potential competitors have struggled in the market to grow
- It will be prohibitively expensive, putting it outside of average consumer affordability
- Not very portable, making it useless in a public use case outside of the home
- Most software made for the device category has been video gaming or severely niche industries requiring post-graduate education and government licensing.
Actually, I've often taken old frames to glasses stores who were happy to provide lenses for frames they had no part in selling. Bose's had these audio glasses for a while, and my glasses store said they could make prescriptions lenses to fit those. So if Apple does this right, they could make it easy for regular glasses stores to make lenses for their headset.All other points aside, I really hope the comment about glasses wearers is wrong.
I would guess the percentage of wearers who may be a buyer is quite high.
Apart from the cost, I wonder how many opticians will be happy to supply custom sized and shaped lens only, with no frames, for a product they have no clue about.
Unless they are exclusively available via Apple, for $$$$$$
That article can’t possibly be true. The experts here keep saying that it can’t possibly be worth over 199.99.
At least the Liquid Metal spray that is used with the magic clothe will be included. Of course it won’t. That’s an extra 99.99 and is enough for only 3 cleanings.I think you are mistaken, the polishing cloth alone will be 199.99!
What were the uses of the Apple I (in 1976) for the average consumer? This will be a primitive product compared to what they will be building for consumers 8 years later and then 47 years later.Just a few more days and we’ll all be smarter…
Until I hear Apple’s pitch for this I remain sceptical about use cases for the average consumer, in the biz world I see lots of use case though…
Trying to wear glasses under a VR headset is just the worst, and dedicated enthusiasts (of say, the kind who would buy a $3000 headset) would buy custom lens mounts anyway. Apple's making life easier for that group by removing the need to get the fittings from a third party like VR Optician (as is currently needed for the Quest 2, Valve Index, etc).Another added expense for those who wear glasses.
Opticians do that all the time. It's less common with tech-related stuff, but requests like replacing old lenses in sunglasses, unusually-shaped glasses frames, etc are just a standard part of the business. I've had it done myself a few times with new prescriptions for old frames.All other points aside, I really hope the comment about glasses wearers is wrong.
I would guess the percentage of wearers who may be a buyer is quite high.
Apart from the cost, I wonder how many opticians will be happy to supply custom sized and shaped lens only, with no frames, for a product they have no clue about.
Unless they are exclusively available via Apple, for $$$$$$
Those "I'm not going to wear something on my face!" arguments are the funniest kind of pushback comment I've seen. Like, yes, obviously most people are never going to feel comfortable wearing a full-sized VR headset in public... but we already know that there's a point at which people will wear things on their face without thinking twice, because those things are called glasses.Do you wear glasses? If Apple gets this light enough, I could see myself wearing one. But I already need to wear glasses when doing anything that requires any reading, so it isn't such a big leap to go from regular glasses to smart glasses.
To be fair, the "company" that created the Apple I was a completely different thing than Apple today.What were the uses of the Apple I (in 1976) for the average consumer? This will be a primitive product compared to what they will be building for consumers 8 years later and then 47 years later.
With Apple’s limited production capabilities, you could sell it later for twice the price… 😉I'm buying Apple's AR/VR Headset Day 1!
Not iPhone? Not iPod? Really, Apple I?What were the uses of the Apple I (in 1976) for the average consumer? This will be a primitive product compared to what they will be building for consumers 8 years later and then 47 years later.