How about the $1500 iPads with 16GB?$2400 iPads are not going to be "flying off the shelf".
How about the $1500 iPads with 16GB?$2400 iPads are not going to be "flying off the shelf".
It’s pretty easy for developers to read the iPad model and dynamically allocate RAM for their app based on that. Early models could be allocated 2Gb per App for example without needing a seperate section on the App Store.iOS 15 will most certainly open this up … if developers make all these apps with high ram limits, then older iPads will not be able to utilize them … so this is tricky. There might need to be an iPad Pro M1 specific app section, causing developers to make multiple versions of the app that utilizes different Ram, for optimization … WWDC will be interesting, it will likely feature lots of specific apps.
If you're Apple and had a huge inventory of the M1 with 16GB SoC and decided to include that in the iPad Pro, it makes sense to allocate the chip to the more expensive storage options. I'm sure they could have put 8GB into the 1TB as well, but then how does that help them when the 8GB SoC is probably in much higher demand than the 16GB, and the huge inventory.
This is of course pure speculation as mentioned. It could be many reasons, but people seem 100% certain the reason 16GB was included was because pro apps. If that's the case, does than mean those with 8GB are going to be annoyed they didn't spring for the 16GB?
Note that iPad OS itself can use all 16GB RAM, ie. By keeping more apps in RAM. It’s just that the individual app is limited in the amount of RAM it can access.I’m surprised it was allowed to ship like that. If you’re paying a premium for those specs you expect it to be supported and utilised
Making my very expensive iPad 'pro' only in the sense that I can leave lots of crap open in the background.Note that iPad OS itself can use all 16GB RAM, ie. By keeping more apps in RAM. It’s just that the individual app is limited in the amount of RAM it can access.
Steve Jobs? The guy who shipped the first iPad with just 256MB of RAM?I'm getting tired of posting this, but once again Steve Jobs would be screaming and ranting and firing people.
Conned 😂😂 sometimes I absolutely despair at the world.this isn't the 'pro' experience I had in mind. if they don't fix this at WWDC, kinda makes me feel like I was conned.
For some use case, like heavy multi tasker, that by itself is already quite useful for productivity. If you expected something different, then you probably needed a Mac, not an iPad. If you already think your iPad Pro is expensive, why did you even buy it?Making my very expensive iPad 'pro' only in the sense that I kinda leave lots of crap open in the background.
I thought that, but Apple wouldn’t replace the screen on my MacBook Air when I broke it by drawing on it. I said ‘but the mac is more productive and can do everything’. They didn’t know what I was talking about.This may very well be opened up with an update, but this why I would never get an iPad for serious productivity. A MacBook is so much more productive IMO.
I hope we get a lot more. Just tempering my expectations. The Files app needs a major overhaul. Tired of getting random errors when trying to copy files from external drives.That would be very disappointing if that is all we get.
Anyone else besides drawing?I thought that, but Apple wouldn’t replace the screen on my MacBook Air when I broke it by drawing on it. I said ‘but the mac is more productive and can do everything’. They didn’t know what I was talking about.
Well that single thing proves that the mac is not better at everything, but taking handwritten notes, editing images, portability, iOS infrastructure, simplicity and ease of use, scanning images, AR, Face ID, accessibility, price (model dependent), security… I don’t know. I love macs, but they’re not better than iPads for doing plenty of things.Anyone else besides drawing?
WOW ! I wander if Android 12 has the same limitation?
Will this be fixed in a future IOS?
Makes buying Ram on the M1 iPad useless at this point.
They guy that pays $2400 for the 16GB M1 is the sucker.
Well that single thing proves that the mac is not better at everything, but taking handwritten notes, editing images, portability, iOS infrastructure, simplicity and ease of use, scanning images, AR, Face ID, accessibility, price (model dependent), security… I don’t know. I love macs, but they’re not better than iPads for doing plenty of things.
Yeah I agree! Bugs me a bit. Macs are ace. No denying. iPads are not macs. Get over it 😂cell network connectivity
much better cameras, lidar, AR stuff, etc.
How about the $1500 iPads with 16GB?
Expensive anything is a niche config. Why when it’s an iPad it annoys you so much, I have no idea.No such thing. Cheapest 16gb is the 1TB model at $1799. Not including a keyboard or accessories (pen etc). Anything under 1TB is 8gb RAM.
So you're basically talking 2 grand. More than a good comparable screen size 13" laptop really well specced out. The top M1 13" Macbook Pro 16gb RAM 1Tb config is $1899; so cheaper than a comparable iPad with any basic keyboard case (and much less than adding the Apple Magic one for $350).
That is where it gets odd for me and what value proposition they are trying to push. When other than touch, the Mac can run iOS apps now PLUS MacOS
$1800+ iPads aren't flying off the shelves. They don't break it down by model, but my guess is the $329 one is the top seller by a long long ways (remember education settings) Then the Air. The iPhone has taught us the lower model of the lineup is typically top seller.
Expensive iPads are niche configs.
Annoys who? And who are you?Expensive anything is a niche config. Why when it’s an iPad it annoys you so much, I have no idea.
Not a car guy I take it?So, yea, the M1 and 16GB RAM in a device running iPadOS is like putting a Ferrari engine inside a Toyota Corolla.
I have not once quoted to you in this thread or responded to one of your posts.Nice. You’ve been quoting me for hours 😂. Just saying… I disagree with your thinking. Macs are good. iPads are good. People are different. It’s very simple.
I am not really bothered by the iPad Pro running iPadOS. While we are talking about analogies, putting macOS on an iPad would be like giving a 2-handed sword to a fencer. It's a powerful weapon, but wholly unsuited for that particular wielder.It's a fit analogy why many aren't tempted by powerful gas guzzling new car (M1) to be limited by gridlock traffic (iPadOS). Best approach is just wait to see what's announced at WWDC on 6/7.