This. People don’t understand the difference in metals behind titanium being cool. Which it is. But it’s not the best in every application — and for a phone alum provides more ups than downs.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone 17 Pro Max Are you disappointed with Aluminum
- Thread starter maverick786us
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
This. People don’t understand the difference in metals behind titanium being cool. Which it is. But it’s not the best in every application — and for a phone alum provides more ups than downs.
Yes it's surprising how bad titanium is as a thermal conductor. So this iPhone Air may throttle a lot. It's always something.....
Have you actually seen one in the flesh? Handled one? etc.? Or are you doing all this from a YouTube video?
I am reserving total judgment until I have it my hands, but I am hopeful about the thermal properties and the weight reduction. Will it feel as premium, perhaps not, but will it really matter.
Titanium costs about 2.5–3 times more than aluminum per kilogram. This is a cut cost behaviour.
Pictures, YT Video and
Ugly or genius? iPhone 17's jarring design explained
The iPhone 17 Air and iPhone 17 Pro look... different. But is there a reason behind this - at first - jarring design?
www.phonearena.com
For the first time, iPhone 17 Pro truly feels deserving of the 'Pro' moniker - 9to5Mac
Apple introduced the Pro moniker for iPhones six years ago with the iPhone 11 lineup. However, with the iPhone 17...
9to5mac.com
There are more posts like these where the
I didn't get my hands on any of those 17 Pro Max Models. Deep sea blue looks bit premium just like my 15 PM except for aluminium frame instead of titanium which is fine now looking into uni body and thermal control. But my only concern is why compromise on elegance and premium and give that crown to some Air model.
Yes specs and performance comes first but add premium and aesthetics.
Pictures, YT Video and
Ugly or genius? iPhone 17's jarring design explained
The iPhone 17 Air and iPhone 17 Pro look... different. But is there a reason behind this - at first - jarring design?
View attachment 2548459
For the first time, iPhone 17 Pro truly feels deserving of the 'Pro' moniker - 9to5Mac
Apple introduced the Pro moniker for iPhones six years ago with the iPhone 11 lineup. However, with the iPhone 17...
View attachment 2548462
There are more posts like these where the
I didn't get my hands on any of those 17 Pro Max Models. Deep sea blue looks bit premium just like my 15 PM except for aluminium frame instead of titanium which is fine now looking into uni body and thermal control. But my only concern is why compromise on elegance and premium and give that crown to some Air model.
Yes specs and performance comes first but add premium and aesthetics.
Because Air is too thin, even with titanium it should be easily banded
Not disappointed at all. The weight benefit is nice, and the thermal improvements are key. The move to titanium a couple years ago was a clear case of form over function: aluminum is the more appropriate material for a high functioning mobile device.
I am however disappointed by there not being a black option.
I am however disappointed by there not being a black option.
The "controversy" regarding Titanium vs Aluminum was exacerbated by Apples incessant hype last year when advertising the iPhone 16 Pro Max.
Claiming Titanium as the most sophisticated premium material ever used in an iPhone. Then, only to reverse course just one year later and substitute aluminum this year, just feels so disgusting.
Much like people being misled by "iPhone 16 Pro Max built for Apple Intelligence".
I do understand the advantages of aluminum as implemented this year, yet only Apple could dig themselves out of such a shift in claims and avoid any responsibility.
Then to have some of the faithful Apple duped, turn to advocate for aluminum is quite revealing.
Claiming Titanium as the most sophisticated premium material ever used in an iPhone. Then, only to reverse course just one year later and substitute aluminum this year, just feels so disgusting.
Much like people being misled by "iPhone 16 Pro Max built for Apple Intelligence".
I do understand the advantages of aluminum as implemented this year, yet only Apple could dig themselves out of such a shift in claims and avoid any responsibility.
Then to have some of the faithful Apple duped, turn to advocate for aluminum is quite revealing.
Not just saying it but I prefer Aluminium. Titanium might be stronger or whatever but I just prefer the look and feel of Aluminium.
I am waiting for some drop tests in tech forms to find out how sturdy these devices are and I hope they score better than its predecessor.
Some EU results are in for this.
iPhone 17 Pro Max is Class B for drop resistance, surviving 180 falls compared to iPhone 16 Pro Max's Class C, which survived 90 falls. Double as resistant to drops.
iPhone Air also is Class B and survived 180 falls. It passed all EU bend tests.
Seems to me that this year’s lineup has something for everyone. If you want aesthetics then Air might edge it. If you want pro end creation then the pro will likely edge it. And if you want performance at a good price point then it’s the 17. Each has design tradeoffs based on the tech and materials available as of this point in time. Next year things will have moved on and might open up different options👍
I think the best looking iPhones were the X. That polished rounded steel looked so premium to me.
I’m not sure whether I’m disappointed. Maybe surprised at first, but looking at all of it from a technical and marketing perspective, it does makes sense.
The iPhone Air is first and foremost centered about its design, whereas the iPhone 17 Pro series about pure and raw power, as many have already pointed out.
And it’s not that aluminum is automatically a cheap kind of material. It may feel less premium when you’re accustomed to stainless steel or titanium (although since I’m putting a case on it, it won’t matter anyway). But things like size, weight and form can make a difference.
That said, to me it’s all about what I do with it, not how it looks like. I would even accept a plastic design if it gets me all the features and battery life I wish for.
THAT to me is what makes a phone premium.
Not to say that the iPhone Air is a bad choice, obviously. Everyone will benefit from this year’s lineup, that’s the good news. They should’ve done this sooner, to be honest.
The iPhone Air is first and foremost centered about its design, whereas the iPhone 17 Pro series about pure and raw power, as many have already pointed out.
And it’s not that aluminum is automatically a cheap kind of material. It may feel less premium when you’re accustomed to stainless steel or titanium (although since I’m putting a case on it, it won’t matter anyway). But things like size, weight and form can make a difference.
That said, to me it’s all about what I do with it, not how it looks like. I would even accept a plastic design if it gets me all the features and battery life I wish for.
THAT to me is what makes a phone premium.
Not to say that the iPhone Air is a bad choice, obviously. Everyone will benefit from this year’s lineup, that’s the good news. They should’ve done this sooner, to be honest.
I get so nostalgic thinking back to 2017. The announcement, the painful wait til the November when the iPhone X came out, that utter joy and awe when unboxing it on release day.
Pure magic!
Hoping for similar feelings when I unbox iPhone Air next week - it's the spiritual successor to iPhone X I think!
It’s really simple: aluminum is the poor man’s titanium.
So iPhone Air or some previous Pros should be the only option.
So iPhone Air or some previous Pros should be the only option.
I’m upgrading from a 14 Pro to the 17 Pro. I’m kinda looking forward to the change from stainless steel to aluminium as my 14 Pro is so damn heavy, it’s at times uncomfortable to hold (especially when you have small women hands like me!). I know on paper the weight isn’t really much different but in everyday use I expect I’ll see an improvement. I don’t worry about scuffs or scratches, I’ve never dropped any of my phones and I keep them in a soft material pouch rather than a hard case, so bits don’t get in and rub against them.
17 Pro is the same weight as 14 Pro but bigger screen tho. I have pre order both 17 Pro and base 17 (just in case they ran out of stock) and will wait to hands on and reviews.
I think it’s more simpler than what people make it. Every Apple Products is made from Aluminum. From iPad, to Macs to Vision Pro. They known how to keep their products running cool.
It. Just. Works.
It. Just. Works.