I bought a refurb max 2015 for £2300 and an equivalent spec 2016 for £3300.
Spending a week comparing both. Overall I like the 2016, surprised that I like the keyboard, and the touch bar, though the touch bar is getting annoying slowly and I appreciate the physical buttons on the 2015.
The touchbad is too big , I hit it accidentally . The design is great . Can't comment on dongles cause they arrive next week. Battery life, running encodes on both , the 2015 had 50% , the 2016 26% using the same file to test , battery life is a worry.
I have to admit that I need an upgrade from my 2012, and I really like the 2016, but just cannot see it being worth £1000 more.... it's basically the same machine with a new chassis...and worse battery .
Have till 8th Jan to decide. Will see if the 2016 plays nice with my sonnet express , deal breaker
[doublepost=1480196043][/doublepost]
The one looking silly here is the one who thinks he is tech literate but in fact isn't, let alone he reads the specs of the standard. Unlike you, the guy you are flaming actually has the proper technical understanding. Why would I say such a thing? Well because of your following example:
USB-C is a completely different standard than USB as it is only a connector and a cable. It can be used for many things, one of which is power, the other is display and another is data but more importantly, it is not tied to any specific standard. You can use it for Thunderbolt as much as you can use it for USB2.0 (which is at 480Mbps or no more than 40MB/s). The cable comes in some varieties being active and passive. In other words, not all USB-C cables or ports are created equal. In this case the charging cable is a USB-C USB2.0 cable meaning that it will charge at a max of 100W and provide data up to USB2.0 speeds. This is entirely within the USB-C spec and so is the USB2.0 speed of the other USB ports on the LG display above.
An apology to the guy you just flamed incorrectly seems in place here.
Though here also lies the problem, how is the user to know which USB-C cables are charge cables at USB-2 speeds and which are 3.1 speeds. USB-C is such a universal standard that it's confusing also.
Most people on apple site will order the USB-c charge cable and not read that it's only USB 2 speed. My expectation was that it was 3.1 to be honest. Along with TB2 comparability issues....it's not a positive