It is actually easy to make batteries safer and contain a failure. It really it. It's an industry problem, no one wants to be exposed to a failing battery on ground or up in the air travelling on a plane. That's all.That's what I thoughtArguing for safer batteries is like arguing for safer cars. No sane person would say no. Attempting to conflate a Volvo with a Pinto, what you keep attempting with nonsense, font sizes and bold, is garbage. I'm bored of it now and it's completely transparent. Honestly, give it a rest, Samsung will be fine
what about seattle to Hawaii?Let's hope for your sake your not flying in a Boeing 787 (Dreamliner) at the same time since that aircraft has been grounded several times by the FAA due to fires with their batteries.
To make you feel a little better, aircraft are seldom more than an hour from land, even when flying across the ocean, e.g Atlantic
It is actually easy to make batteries safer and contain a failure. It really it. It's an industry problem, no one wants to be exposed to a failing battery on ground or up in the air travelling on a plane. That's all.
Spot on. One chance to correct the issue. Second time no more chances. Especially for such a serious issue.If there are problems with the replacements, the note 7 is finished , by the time a version without issues is released, consumer faith will have deteriorated . The note 8 is gonna have to be issue free.
Samsung is gonna loose out from a consumer trust point of view also, this has massive reprecussions, the note sales themselves are not even the big picture.
what about seattle to Hawaii?![]()
Ummm really? Your statement gave the answer. A safe battery would mean this Samsung issue would never have occurred. Simple.You keep stating plain and simple truths. It's easy(ish) to make batteries safer by reducing their useful space and therefore capacity. What does that have to do with the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 being unusually unsafe though?
Ummm really? Your statement gave the answer. A safe battery would mean this Samsung issue would never have occurred. Simple.
Put into perspective, half of the Boeing 787's flying at the time were having battery fires. They were grounded, the whole fleet, they had further problems. It took more than a year to resolve, they kept flying. This was a plane rushed out in 15 years! This technology has issues.Are you honestly unable to understand the concept of scale? Do you honestly think Samsung pulled millions of phones from the market for a problem in the scale that can "hit any manufacturer"? Do you genuinely not understand this or are you being dishonest?
Put into perspective, half of the Boeing 787's flying at the time were having battery fires. They were grounded, the whole fleet, they had further problems. It took more than a year to resolve, they kept flying. This was a plane rushed out in 15 years! This technology has issues.
Samsung did absolutely everything they could practically do, it is amazing how quiet the Southwest story is since it broke, considering the ramifications at stake.
Surly sales should have been stopped weeks ago. So what if these types of phones are stopped on planes. Surly living is better than being killed.
We have Samsung washing machines catching fire in New Zealand. They have been recalled but not every person looks at media until their house burns down and they become front page news.
True, even if the highest reports of 100 fires over one million phones is correct, that's about 1 in 10,000.
Everything is relative.
- That's less than the chance of dying in a car wreck.
- It's about five times less chance than dying in a car wreck because you were texting.
- It's 5,000 times less than the chance that you will be diagnosed with cancer.
Airlines don't bother turning around for in-cabin device battery fires, which are easily extinguished. Flight crew have been trained to handle them for years now, and have done so. It's not that big a deal.
The fact that they even do an announcement to turn them off is ironic, coming from the same airlines that refused for decades to install cargo hold fire extinguishers, because it was officially considered cheaper to pay dead passenger relatives in the case of a rare crash from fire, than to retrofit all the planes.
In-cabin small device fires can be handled. It's the cargo hold ones that cannot.
Sad that so many macrumors members are reading and commenting here with satisfaction over Samsungs issues. Deplorable.
Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Samsung doesn't take much of a public hit over this Note 7 battery debacle. TBD on Wall Street's reaction so will need to pay close attention to Samsung's next quarter earnings report. The utter hipocrosy in all of this, if tables were turned and an Apple device's battery was causing fires at this same high rate and volume, then oh man, the sky would be falling and the mainstream press would be having a field day. (Much more so than is currently being covered.) Watch next year's Note 8 be priced in line with the current gen device and dinky Samsung continuing merrily along as if they hadn't skipped a beat.Samsung needs to just eat this one and stop all sales and recall all of the Note 7's. Anyone wanting to try out a Note 8 next year, you are in luck, they should be cheap.
you can probably train people to look for one specific thingas someone who used to work for the TSA, it is nearly impossible for us to stop phones from entering an aircraft. almost everyone travels with a phone and we can't search every bag to see if they have a note 7.
all cell phones look similar on an x-ray image.
Stop making excuses for Samsung please. There aren't any. Thank you for your cooperation.True, even if the highest reports of 100 fires over one million phones is correct, that's about 1 in 10,000.
Everything is relative.
- That's less than the chance of dying in a car wreck.
- It's about five times less chance than dying in a car wreck because you were texting.
- It's 5,000 times less than the chance that you will be diagnosed with cancer.
Airlines don't bother turning around for in-cabin device battery fires, which are easily extinguished. Flight crew have been trained to handle them for years now, and have done so. It's not that big a deal.
The fact that they even do an announcement to turn them off is ironic, coming from the same airlines that refused for decades to install cargo hold fire extinguishers, because it was officially considered cheaper to pay dead passenger relatives in the case of a rare crash from fire, than to retrofit all the planes.
In-cabin small device fires can be handled. It's the cargo hold ones that cannot.
I'm not conflating anything. Nor am I engaging in deception. Such exaggeration.
One samsung replacement device has caught on fire. No other reports of replacement devices.
But overall the industry has a big problem. These batteries are essentially encased and wrapped in thin plastics. That needs to change. THERE HAS TO BE A MUCH BETTER WAY.
True, even if the highest reports of 100 fires over one million phones is correct, that's about 1 in 10,000.
Everything is relative.
- That's less than the chance of dying in a car wreck.
- It's about five times less chance than dying in a car wreck because you were texting.
- It's 5,000 times less than the chance that you will be diagnosed with cancer.
Well something more durable than thin plastics that at least attempts to contain the battery reaction -- ceramic?What would you wrapped them in, titanum enforced lead? The industry has a problem with batteries, but exploding is not the biggest of them.