Text messaging should be INCLUDED in data plans. It doesnt cost the telecom companies anything.
How much you wanna bet that within the year $20 for unlimited texts becomes $20 for a capped amount od texts? With them charging a premium for anyone who texts more than the cap?
ATT has already done this with their so called "unlimited" data plans. Such a joke. Unlimited. Yeah riiiiiiight.
Its only going to get worse.
I am glad that Apple offers an unlocked iphone....because their exclusive deal with ATT has become a prison enabling ATT to pull this crap.
I know Apple offers Verizon now, but thats not the same. I travel alot, and want the freedom of a GSM phone.
I hear that Apple is working on a universal iphone. A true world wide standard with both chips inside, enabling it to go anywhere and join any provider. Dont know if it'll be the iphone 5 or iphone 6.....but its coming.
Iphone users wont be trapped in ATT anymore. There will be true options out there.
Heck, Apple has more cash than the United States of America....they should start their own Telecom Company!
Text messaging doesn't cost telcos any money? Really? If that's true, why don't you create your own Text Messaging company and pocket all those profits?
People forget that a text message service relies upon a network of servers that require hardware/software, network and storage capacity, power, floor space, and the cost to maintain/troubleshoot/upgrade such components (people). It ain't free. However, it is profitable....but hey, business is business.
It is a recent change, you have to actually ask for it if you are on an unlimited text plan now. I don't know if there are limits as to what minutes plan you have to be on to take advantage though.
How does streamlining (i.e. removing every plan, other than the most expensive plan) benefit customers?
It's no wonder that so many people hate AT&T
The best thing to do is to jailbreak your iphone, then install the GV Extension for the iPhone (http://gvexts.appspot.com/sms/sms.html), & that way you can have native texting through the integrated messaging app using google voice.
I use google voice for texting & it's very reliable & that combined with either bitesms or irealsms (with the ability to speak text out loud & being able to reply in any window = awesome), is awesome.
Less confusion. Isn't that the same reason why all of Apples stuff is so streamlined?
Question to all, how useful is iMessage when you are in an area of poor network signal?
I wouldnt put too much faith into the word "grandfathering".....i was the first to buy the first gen ipad with the unlimited data plan. Not even a year later, ATT got rid of the unlimited plan....and said people still on the unlimited plan would be grandfathered in. Then a few months later....they CAP the unlimited plan! LOL. So no more unlimited.....even tho i pay for unlimited. Lol. I havent gone over yet....but thats NOT the point. I paid for unlimited.
So dont put too much faith in being grandfathered in....or keeping your old text messaging plan that you have now. I am sure that those paying for a limited text plan now will be forced one way or another to pay more or get less soon enough.
If I have bars, I can send an SMS. iMessage will eventually send as SMS (I think it waits 5 minutes). My train ride into DC is littered with areas of meh signal. Yet I can still send SMS (and sometimes even hold on to a phone call).How useful is any phone in an area of poor network signal? Troll smarter, not harder.
Question to all, how useful is iMessage when you are in an area of poor network signal?
How much you wanna bet that within the year $20 for unlimited texts becomes $20 for a capped amount od texts? With them charging a premium for anyone who texts more than the cap?
...was thinking the same thing. if apple could license iMessage to the biggest smartphone vendors (Google, Microsoft, Rim, HP) then it would be taken care of. I think a lot of people would like this. I mean RIM might not take it because of BBM and Apple probably won't but i think it would go far.
You know what's better than AT&T's texting plan? No texting plan!
I remember back when I first signed up and got my iPhone 3GS I was told I "had" to have a texting plan - even if it wasn't the $20 or $10 plan. It could be the ala carte, $0.25 per text plan.
The next day after I got the iPhone I called AT&T and said to completely turn off texting. I didn't want to send or receive texts, ever. They turned the service off.
Never had to pay for texting.
It's a smart phone. It's got email, IM and just about everything else that doesn't require any extra fees.![]()
If you have 5 lines on your account like we do, the $30 family texting plan is a great deal.
Text messaging doesn't cost telcos any money? Really? If that's true, why don't you create your own Text Messaging company and pocket all those profits?
People forget that a text message service relies upon a network of servers that require hardware/software, network and storage capacity, power, floor space, and the cost to maintain/troubleshoot/upgrade such components (people). It ain't free. However, it is profitable....but hey, business is business.
It's not independent. It's on ALL cell phones. You do have a base minute plan, but you can drop from a higher minute plan to a lesser minute plan to get unlimited mobile to mobile calling to any cell phone.
Instead of having 900 minutes and 1000 text messages, for less you can have 450 minutes and unlimited texting AND unlimited calling to ANY cell phone. It's a better value.
My source is AT&T's website and brochures.
There is no data cap, there is a bandwidth throttling at some nebulous amount of data transfer.
If I have bars, I can send an SMS. iMessage will eventually send as SMS (I think it waits 5 minutes). My train ride into DC is littered with areas of meh signal. Yet I can still send SMS (and sometimes even hold on to a phone call).
Wow, US telcos are strange (I find networks selling phones awkward, it's a buy your own phone, get a plan later here).
I don't even have a text plan but it's dirt cheap. Considering it's RM0.01 per text which is barely a cent in USD. I don't pay to receive SMS too.
presumably just as useful as a regular SMS - they both travel over the same network connection.