Why does MacRumors give any credence to Consumer Reports? While the facts in the survey could be correct, always consider the source. For over two decades, Consumer Reports has been on a mission to destroy Apple. In report after report, Consumer Reports has always either slammed or ignored Apple completely when ranking various computers and products.
In the "Antennagate" (God, I hate that term), Consumer Reports tried to paint Apple as the only company whose products had a possible attenuation problem. They flat out lied about many aspects, and when proven wrong and caught in their lies, Consumer Reports never retracted their assertions, knowing full-well that the damage had already been done.
It would not surprise me if these purveyors of a beige, dull, unfriendly world that is Consumer Reports is on the take from Apple competitors. I sense that they hate Apple for all that it stands for, hate beautiful design, hate creativity and fun. The East Coast bureaucrats that run Consumer Reports envision a world where we all drive Chrysler K-Cars painted beige, where we live in a beige house that looks exactly the same as our neighbors, eat the same dull, generic foods and we all use beige PCs running DOS.
If you get the impression that I have long loathed Consumer Reports, you guessed right. So please, MacRumors, don't give these cork-soaking bastiches any links or clicks. You only empower them.
End of the world is coming shortly hereafter.
Look again, that wasn't a smiley face.![]()
AT&T is seriously horrible...im not jumping ship and hating on them because everyone else is. I have my own horror stories with them...Not just on my iPhone bill, but with my internet issues as well...overall as a company, customer service is nothing they care about. I have filed my formal complaint with them yesterday. Cant wait for them to lose the iPhone.![]()
It's really about where you are. When I was living in Boston, I had T-mobile with very few drop calls, if ever. Switched to iphone AT&T and it wasn't great, but bearable. Moved to LA last year and it's total crap shoot now. There are dead spots all over the place, don't even think about trying to drive and talk, you are sure to lose calls, voice mails without a call all the time, and don't even think about being in the Hollywood Hills to try and make a call. No service. The rich bastards refuse to have any cell tower within 20 mile range of their multi-million dollar homes.
Whenever I get dropped calls on the iPhone, simply switching to my BlackBerry or Android phone is all it takes, suddenly a getting a good connection and clear call is no problem. BB's & Android phones work just fine on AT&T.
AT&T sucks, I only have them because of the iPhone.![]()
This is retarded. ATT's goodness is subjective to where you live. For me, ATT is WAY better than Verizon.
.
Why does MacRumors give any credence to Consumer Reports? While the facts in the survey could be correct, always consider the source. For over two decades, Consumer Reports has been on a mission to destroy Apple. In report after report, Consumer Reports has always either slammed or ignored Apple completely when ranking various computers and products.
In the "Antennagate" (God, I hate that term), Consumer Reports tried to paint Apple as the only company whose products had a possible attenuation problem. They flat out lied about many aspects, and when proven wrong and caught in their lies, Consumer Reports never retracted their assertions, knowing full-well that the damage had already been done.
It would not surprise me if these purveyors of a beige, dull, unfriendly world that is Consumer Reports is on the take from Apple competitors. I sense that they hate Apple for all that it stands for, hate beautiful design, hate creativity and fun. The East Coast bureaucrats that run Consumer Reports envision a world where we all drive Chrysler K-Cars painted beige, where we live in a beige house that looks exactly the same as our neighbors, eat the same dull, generic foods and we all use beige PCs running DOS.
If you get the impression that I have long loathed Consumer Reports, you guessed right. So please, MacRumors, don't give these cork-soaking bastiches any links or clicks. You only empower them.
You know what, I'm not a big fan of AT&T, but I REALLY dislike Consumer Reports and couldn't care less what their reports have to say. After their iPhone report, I have zero respect for that company and really don't trust their ratings and reviews. I mean, how can that company possibly expect people to respect their reviews if they cannot recommend an outstanding device (iPhone 4) which as made one of the largest impacts in the cellphone industry in the past decade. Their reasoning for that review was flawed and very poor and there's nothing to say that it's not the same for this AT&T report. All ratings are subjective, but to claim that they cannot recommend a product because of some ridiculous finding is unbelievable. While I cannot agree that AT&T is the worst carrier, it really doesn't matter as I really don't care what a CR publication has to say.
Maybe I'll make up a form and fill in some little dots and come up with a percentage rating. In fact, here:
Best & Worst Reviewers (Sorry Consumer Reports)
Reliability of Reviews: Consumer Reports - 0%
This is what happened when they invest most of their money on advertising rather than infrastructure. How many of those commercials I've seen on TV trying to make themselves look good. Stupid!
This survey is flawed. The participants are anonymous and cannot be verified. In addition, in this particular survey all of the iPhone users are on a single network (AT&T). As everyone knows, iPhone users have a unique expectation level and they stress the network far above all other cell phone users. This has skewed the results.
More than half of the AT&T respondents were iPhone users. Im sure there are still some network capacity issues yet I bet more than a few of the respondents wanted to make a statement regarding exclusivity by clobbering AT&T in this survey. It would be interesting to see the survey results if you could take away the iPhone users.
Next years survey will become more meaningful when we can compare iPhone users on multiple carriers. (IE how does a Verizon iPhone user compare with an AT&T iPhone user, T-Mobile, Sprint, etc).
In fact, Consumer reports should compare the same cell phones on various networks to get a like for like result. Whats the point of comparing a network full of voice/text users with a network that carries most of the wireless internet traffic?
My own editorial comment: for some reason, Consumer Reports has an issue with large and successful companies (Apple/AT&T).