Good point.My prediction is sometime this year Google will file to buy T-Mobile.
G-Mobile anyone?
Good point.My prediction is sometime this year Google will file to buy T-Mobile.
G-Mobile anyone?
My prediction is sometime this year Google will file to buy T-Mobile.
G-Mobile anyone?
I understand it to work like this. Each cell is allocated a certain amount of backhaul bandwidth. Monthly costs to maintain each cell site are essentially fixed, regardless of utilization. This is similar to having ethernet in your home; the cost of keeping your switch running stays the same, regardless of how much you use it, or if it is 10baseT or gigabit ethernet.
It appears to me that tiered pricing should be used to assign traffic priority during congested periods, not to set monthly limits on data volume.
The current pricing tries to gets you thinking that data volume has value, and the carriers are not "dumb pipes".
8CoreWhore said:Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
Yes. Because the loss of all-you-can-eat data is comparable to the holocaust. Well said.
But the principle is exactly the same. Just because that saying was used for a terrible crime doesn't mean that saying is now forbidden to be used forever.
southernpaws said:Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
8CoreWhore said:Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
Yes. Because the loss of all-you-can-eat data is comparable to the holocaust. Well said.
But the principle is exactly the same. Just because that saying was used for a terrible crime doesn't mean that saying is now forbidden to be used forever.
No, but it does make it trite and dilutes the meaning and power of the poem that was hijacked
gorskiegangsta said:southernpaws said:Yes. Because the loss of all-you-can-eat data is comparable to the holocaust. Well said.
Way to completely miss the point. The quote that post was based on wasn't about the Holocaust, it was about the spread of oppression.
southernpaws said:gorskiegangsta said:southernpaws said:Yes. Because the loss of all-you-can-eat data is comparable to the holocaust. Well said.
Way to completely miss the point. The quote that post was based on wasn't about the Holocaust, it was about the spread of oppression.
I didn't miss the point. If you're trying to mobilize people to action, you might be better served by invoking a more applicable situation. People are hijacking one of the most powerful poems ever and using it to advocate everything from this to the lack of reduced fat peanut butter in stores. It's downright lazy.
Oppression. Seriously?
My prediction is sometime this year Google will file to buy T-Mobile.
G-Mobile anyone?
It's only a matter of time before we're all affected by AT&T's throttling.
Will one of you who have received a throttle notice please get on the phone and find an attorney who's looking for a class action suit?
sounds like time for a class action lawsuit.
2gb is NOT unlimited.
Why? You're still getting what you paid for and that is unlimited data. Doesn't mean it has to be all of the same speed.
----------
You're not capped at 2GB, you're throttled at 2GB. Know the difference please.
Why? You're still getting what you paid for and that is unlimited data. Doesn't mean it has to be all of the same speed.
It's unreasonable because you bought the service based on the premise that you would have unlimited 3g, not limited 3g and unlimited edge. you at&t apologists make me sick.
Class action suit with an immediate injunction pending outcome, with the suggested damages being reallowance to at least 10GB, not quite unlimited, and a cash settlement for the differential between what is throttled and what the top 1% users use times the total subscribed users times the plan duration with all entitled renewals factored in.
The filing alone may get some action and if not, cool!
Any lawyer will take this one on contingency.
Stop saying that. It is limited. There is no other way to define it. The penalty for going over the limit may not be the same as on the tiered plan (overage charges) but their is a penalty for going over a limit. Slower internet speed. It is still a limit. Stop trying to say it isn't.
So when LTE rolls out, you're saying that all unlimited data users should only have 3G? Since that's what was offered when they signed up?
Get a dictionary. Stop whining.
littyboy said:Stop saying that. It is limited. There is no other way to define it. The penalty for going over the limit may not be the same as on the tiered plan (overage charges) but their is a penalty for going over a limit. Slower internet speed. It is still a limit. Stop trying to say it isn't.
Get a dictionary. Stop whining.