meh, so if the network isn't strong enough to handle a real emergency (like the earthquake in your post), we should just accept that? If it's so volatile that a simple blog post can bring it down, we should all be focusing on the blog post instead of the gaping flaws in critical infrastructure?
Deeper problems are there. Don't blame that guy for exposing them in this relatively harmless manner (I doubt anyone will die because they missed a critical email, btw.. much more than likely they'll die because of a dropped call on AT&T's consistently poor network. but whatever).
1. I hate "meh"
2. PikachuMan - why?
3. An earthquake and most disasters overload wireless networks and in many cases wireline networks. Don't blame that on AT&T, Verizon, Sprint etc. If you want them to build their networks to be able to handle those emergencies everywhere at anytime then you better be prepared to pay ten times your current rate.