I think more specifically, I didn't know Nividia was a contributor to Audi. I'm a huge Audi fan and have been for years. I figured I would have read this somewhere on the Audi forums I frequent.
You've never heard of the Audi VirtualCockPit?
I think more specifically, I didn't know Nividia was a contributor to Audi. I'm a huge Audi fan and have been for years. I figured I would have read this somewhere on the Audi forums I frequent.
That video won't play embedded, but IIRC that is the one where there was a stopped car on the road and the Tesla didn't stop in time to not hit it right?ROFLOL!
For some reason... no, not for some reason, for a very specific one: control. That provides gov't, and those that run it, with unique opportunities to increase their power over citizens.
I'd still love to see some information about how many people really want a self driving car and at what price. I've seen nothing about how much such a car would cost and how much the data usage would cost.
To me it might be nice for that once a year when I take a long highway trip (many hours) to be able to take a break from driving but I can't see using it daily. I also expect that the cost will be relatively very high. Sure for buses and maybe highway trucks but the companies that are getting into it aren't doing it for those uses.
I could be wrong but...again I'd love to see some study that asks would you want one and if yes if it cost 20% more would you?
ROFLOL!
My wife isn't too keen on self driving, but she is excited about self parking. Especially self parallel parking.Lots of my friends dont trust them yet. At what point that will change, I'm not sure. However while they all don't trust the idea of fully autonomous, they all seem to like the idea of a car which, if the driver passed out (for example), could safely stop and park itself.
[doublepost=1483622608][/doublepost]
More reliable than humans... not "never crashes".
From keynote : " 10:50PM EST - 'Let's make sure none of our kids ever have to learn to drive' "
Excuse me? You wanna say this is the direction they wanna take humanity in?
![]()
I'd rather not thank you. Tesla's Autopilot in its current state is about as far as it should go. Driver assisting, not driver replacing.
I don't see how auto-cars have anything to do with what you're paranoid of. In fact you might argue that manual cars encourage just as much sitting around. Should we abolish all cars just to encourage people to walk more? How about buses and trains?From keynote : " 10:50PM EST - 'Let's make sure none of our kids ever have to learn to drive' "
Excuse me? You wanna say this is the direction they wanna take humanity in?
I'd rather not thank you. Tesla's Autopilot in its current state is about as far as it should go. Driver assisting, not driver replacing.
Or maybe the extra work I can do while the car drives me to work allows me to make time for a run in my day. Its just a way to make the roads safer and give us time back what we will do with is all up to us.From keynote : " 10:50PM EST - 'Let's make sure none of our kids ever have to learn to drive' "
Excuse me? You wanna say this is the direction they wanna take humanity in?
![]()
I'd rather not thank you. Tesla's Autopilot in its current state is about as far as it should go. Driver assisting, not driver replacing.
I don't own a Tesla, but know people who do which they exclusively bought a Tesla for Autopilot and full self driving. While they do not fully rely on either feature they have enabled Autopilot on the hwy to show off changing lanes, or just driving at steady speed. What I do love is that at the tiniest tap of the brake or moving the steering wheel turns off auto pilot giving the driver back full control.
I think you'd need to re-engineer the roads first....Its just a way to make the roads safer and give us time back what we will do with is all up to us.
How many children will be plowed over before this lunacy will stop? How will the AI decide if the child's life is worth it when it might cause an accident to swerve, assuming the car sees the kid in time (known problem with the systems so far). Will the government be actively involved in certifying a system that chooses to run over a toddler "for the greater good"?
Also, how do you tell the car where to park on your driveway, how to avoid flooding, how to navigate tire level obstacles? How to prevent the car from taking you up a road closed in bad weather and stranding you? You hear stories of clueless people following GPS into danger, what happens when the car does it itself and you can't stop it?
Didn't realise Nvidia was a player in this market, let alone a leader. How on earth did they get an edge over Apple with all the cash, talent and other resources it has behind it?
From keynote : " 10:50PM EST - 'Let's make sure none of our kids ever have to learn to drive' "
Excuse me? You wanna say this is the direction they wanna take humanity in?
![]()
I'd rather not thank you. Tesla's Autopilot in its current state is about as far as it should go. Driver assisting, not driver replacing.
I think tapping the brake disengages the whole system, while tugging on the steering wheel disengages Autosteer, leaving TACC enabled.And what if that tiniest tap was accidental?
Say the driver was nodding off, or just bumped the steering wheel with his elbow as he turned the page of the book he was reading?
All of a sudden, full control of a vehicle speeding along the highway is tossed back to a disengaged and distracted driver.
Hope he's a good catcher.
[doublepost=1483623980][/doublepost]
I think you'd need to re-engineer the roads first.
Didn't realise Nvidia was a player in this market, let alone a leader. How on earth did they get an edge over Apple with all the cash, talent and other resources it has behind it?
Apple isn't keen on licensing hardware to third parties either Nvidia is giving out (uh selling) GPU tech along with 'supercomputing' backend.Nvidia have been involved in cars for years, they have worked with Audi for quite some time with their chips powering Audis infotainment and car systems.
Plus Audi knows how to design a car.
Apple has no clue and it shows, they are attempting to go it alone by hiring people but then firing them so it's rumoured, they seem to be in a total mess over whatever they are doing with cars. Plus I think they tried to rocker deals with car manufactures but they would not accept the terms as Apple wanted to much? I think.
Apple is as I thought are a long way behind and Google is lagging as well now. If your not into making cars then don't expect any easy ride, Nvidia has done the smart thing. The autonomous market will be flooded by cars from the usual car manufactures way before Apple and Google launch anything for public sale.
Tim Cook.Didn't realise Nvidia was a player in this market, let alone a leader. How on earth did they get an edge over Apple with all the cash, talent and other resources it has behind it?
Some accidents are impossible to avoid (say a car falls in front of you from an overhead bridge, or something happens within braking distance). I believe an autonomous car is simply better than a driver, stats in hand, and that's already the case in highway driving.
I would love to put my son, when he gets to that age, in a car and tell the car to take him directly to the friends house and return home. You can't tell me that wouldn't be cool.
Enough already with the full autonomous, self driving cars.
The majority don't want them, but yet for some reason someone or some (governmental) entity seems intent on ramming them down our throat.
Hopefully the new administration in Washington puts the brakes on this.
In the current form, I am not sure why the driver would be reading a book.