Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yeah, you're right... the truth about what's going on and presenting it in the clearest fashion is best for everyone (including Apple... where the truth seems to be in short supply).

I'm not sure that that is fair on Apple. I see the company as a multi-headed creature. It seems worldwide that our approaches to support staff at Apple concerning this bug are met with rather useless responses. Basically Apple support people mostly just don't get it, don't listen or think what the customer is showing them or trying to say. The response seems to be a polite brush off and platitudes often laced with bull, even rotten lies. An infuriating experience, but in part we may be at fault for expecting anything more. You paid the price of a small car for this computer, but seemingly get less respect or response than you would from any local garage. But it is unclear to me that Apple actually promised competent support operations. I expected it, but the mismatch between my expectations/assumptions and the reality must in part be of my making.

Go into an Apple store to seek 09MP audio bug support and join the queue behind the hoards of kids with iPod nanos. The same staff deal with everything. And they come with training and a culture which is highly regulated (especially in defending the Apple brand image). The issues involved in this bug are way over their heads.

But I'm sure there are other parts of Apple that are able, informed, competent, reasonable, and would like to both fix this bug and be straight with customers. Unfortunately the company seems to be structured so these people never communicate with us, only the care staff (geniuses etc) are allowed customer contact.

We've been hammering at Apple's door in every way we can think of for a long time now. I'm sure other people have been here before us. It must be a standard stand-off. Us shouting for Apple to listen, Apple silent and unresponsive. This is just the way the company is structured. And to give them credit, the formula seems to work (as far as their bank account is concerned).

Our best option seems to be to pool our intelligence, try to draw atoms of information together. Check our facts. And by conducting ourselves openly and honestly, hope to draw in more support and win over friends who are more competent to explain, even fix, this bug. Whether inside or outside Apple.

I'm just arguing for a separation of any frustration at Apple versus the bug technical issues. It may seem bizarre but if you discount what Apple support people make up, it is not obvious that Apple has done much lying in any of this - they just don't communicate at all. The feeling is that they must be mad not to realize how exasperating and un-constructive this silence is, but it could be that just this communications strategy has made them so rich.

I think of it like having a car wreck. My inclination is to apologize for any part I had in it and try to help other people. But a lawyer would advise me to admit no liability, formally report it and walk away like a callous zombie. Lawyers get rich, people like me don't.

I'm recalibrating my expectations and assumptions about Apple. By thinking less of the company, I find I can appreciate the technology better.

Sorry to go on ... just trying to fit square pegs into circular holes.
 
i think maybe worth sending Steve jobs a email with all the links to the storys about this issue. & the head of europeon support.

worth a shot at least they will know its out there.
 
Question? Comment?

Guys,

Forgive me, it's late and I ache and I don't know if this will make sense to bring up.
I have both the Rad4870 and the Gtx285. I bought the 285 before it came out and while it was no doubt a more powerful card then the 4870, it wasn't anything worth the price. Plus, it didn't seem to work too well with a lot of things the 4870 could handle with ease. Certain apps, certain games.
I've always felt ripped off knowing all the while it was up to Apple to do better with the cards drivers. They never did. 10.6.3 is supposed to have driver updates. We'll see.

However, on the Windows side, and I think Macs running Windows with the 285. The card was supposed to scream and was obviously better than the 4870. I'm not sure of that since I don't have Windows, but that's what I heard several people say.

So if it's true, that the card was faster on the Windows side, what would that mean?
Same as in this situation? Is it that Windows superiority in both these areas means it knows how to do things the Mac OS does not? Or is it Windows superiority in handling the Macs own hardware?
Or does that amount to the same thing. Yeah, up too late...
 
Don't bother wasting your time at Apple Ang Mo Kio, eServ or basically any Apple authorised repair centres. They know nuts about this issue. I probably saved you all the trouble of lugging your machine down and getting a 'everything is ok' reply. Save yourself the pain and anger listening to daft tech guys telling you to 'reinstall', reset SMC, don't listen to music when working blah blah blah...

Cheers.

Eemzah,

Thanks for the info, today I spent 2 plus hours talking to Apple at AMK, firstly with an ordinary(noob) agent and then an Australian guy based in Singapore, as I consider that this issue is getting so much press, it was a good idea to raise it again.

I thought I was in luck as the Australian guy said at one stage they would send an engineer round to run some tests, however after some 5 minute pauses he rescinded that saying it was unlikely hardware related.

I have a MacPro 209 2.26 Octo, a 2009 MacMini 2.5GHz and a 2008 iMac 24, plus a 2.86 i7 hackintosh running on an MSI GD80 with 8GB Geil memory which outperforms the macPro and all four cores with hypertheading run 10-15 degrees cooler running the same apps and in the same room....

I was given the usual run around, however it is important that as many as possible raise this again so Apple have to listen, and although a very long thread with MacRumors and others highlighting the issue, how can it be ignored.

We of course have the standards commission here, we also have Al Gore on the Apple Board, perhaps we could raise the "Green" issue with him.

This MacPro is a great room heater we do not need here in Singapore, and within limits or not it uses an excess of power for doing nothing.
 
Eemzah,

Thanks for the info, today I spent 2 plus hours talking to Apple at AMK, firstly with an ordinary(noob) agent and then an Australian guy based in Singapore, as I consider that this issue is getting so much press, it was a good idea to raise it again.

I thought I was in luck as the Australian guy said at one stage they would send an engineer round to run some tests, however after some 5 minute pauses he rescinded that saying it was unlikely hardware related.

I have a MacPro 209 2.26 Octo, a 2009 MacMini 2.5GHz and a 2008 iMac 24, plus a 2.86 i7 hackintosh running on an MSI GD80 with 8GB Geil memory which outperforms the macPro and all four cores with hypertheading run 10-15 degrees cooler running the same apps and in the same room....

I was given the usual run around, however it is important that as many as possible raise this again so Apple have to listen, and although a very long thread with MacRumors and others highlighting the issue, how can it be ignored.

We of course have the standards commission here, we also have Al Gore on the Apple Board, perhaps we could raise the "Green" issue with him.

This MacPro is a great room heater we do not need here in Singapore, and within limits or not it uses an excess of power for doing nothing.
Hi Tony,

I can reassure you the engineer will tell you to reinstall the OS, reset SMC, remove any third party program and don't listen to music when doing work. Sorry if I sound like a wet blanket (though I feel like wrapping myself in one during the day here). I don't know if they are aware of the problem despite the extensive online media coverage. I have lugged my machine to the service centre twice already and all I get is a within limits reply. Can be quite frustrating.

However, if they do offer a fix, very likely it will be a global one.

Cheers buddy
Hazmee
 
I can reassure you the engineer will tell you to reinstall the OS, reset SMC, remove any third party program and don't listen to music when doing work.

Hard to believe that they don't feel ashamed of themselves. That is absolutely ridiculous and I hardly believe that they ever thought more than half a minute about a decent answer.
Our local Apple Store has logic installed on the Pro, is that a third party App, too?

Sorry Apple, but that's really a evidence of incapacity. :mad:
It gets harder and harder to think about buying a Mac Pro again...
Till now, ONE of out four Mac Pros was a good buy, the 3.1. All other machines have some serious flaws. Earlier machines, so called '64bit XEON workstations', don't support 64bit OS X kernel, and we all know about the latest machine.
'Crapstation' would fit much better.

Sorry but it pisses me off when I hear such brazen excuses like 'don't play audio while working'. That's no premium service Apple, that's NO service.
 
Just a small update, you may have noticed I've removed a few of my posts.

Im working closely with executive relations on the matter and they have been very helpful so far.

I shall see what engineering have to say on the matter.
 
Just a small update, you may have noticed I've removed a few of my posts.

Im working closely with executive relations on the matter and they have been very helpful so far.

I shall see what engineering have to say on the matter.

Thank you very much for your effort!
I'm really curious if you've got more luck than others. Let's hope the best. :)
 
New Article

Another new article (and this one's not just a re-hash of the Ars Technica article). Lloyd Chambers over at Diglloyd.com took the time to run his own tests measuring the power increase and presented his findings. Interestingly enough, he couldn't find any performance impact when he ran his memory tests but he did see an impact with Xbench (which is apparently mostly single threaded).

http://diglloyd.com/diglloyd/index.html
 
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear! What have I done?
I've just ordered a Mac pro 2.66 quad after returning 3 imacs with all of the issues they have had.
I got out of the "my imac doesn't work properly" forums, and seem to have landed straight into the world of "my mac pro doesn't work properly" forums!

As I brought the MP as an audio device only, I was flabbergasted to learn this is one of things the MP has a problem with!

If I wanted my cpu to get hot and use 50 extra watts on playing an mp3,
I would have brought a 10 year old laptop and stuck a light bulb on top!!

I'm almost definitely going to return it when it arrives Monday, as reading this forum suggests it's more than a few unlucky customers..
I waited for three months for a fix for the flickermac.
I'm not gonna wait another three months for this!:mad:
 
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear! What have I done?
I've just ordered a Mac pro 2.66 quad after returning 3 imacs with all of the issues they have had.
I got out of the "my imac doesn't work properly" forums, and seem to have landed straight into the world of "my mac pro doesn't work properly" forums!

As I brought the MP as an audio device only, I was flabbergasted to learn this is one of things the MP has a problem with!

If I wanted my cpu to get hot and use 50 extra watts on playing an mp3,
I would have brought a 10 year old laptop and stuck a light bulb on top!!

I'm almost definitely going to return it when it arrives Monday, as reading this forum suggests it's more than a few unlucky customers..
I waited for three months for a fix for the flickermac.
I'm not gonna wait another three months for this!:mad:

Oh come on... I think we should cool down a bit. I use my Mac Pro for heavy loaded tracks in Logic and it works great.... You have to decide on your own what you are gonna do. But I have a 10°C heat increase when I just plug in my interface into my MacBook Pro too. I have not investigated much more time in testings for that... The audio problem has something to do with the Mac Pro specific, but also something with the OS itself when it goes to external interfaces at least. Would be interesting what other users will get if they just plug-in their interface in any mac (not macpro)....
At least, I say "normal" users will not notice any of these problems we are talking about. I am follow this thread since almost the beginning and I think we are doing well so far and of course this problem has to be solved. But it won't be solved by not buying Mac Pro's anymore, because they will get more expensive and less the quality when there are less mac pro buyers... - This is my point of view at least.
 
Just a small update, you may have noticed I've removed a few of my posts.

Im working closely with executive relations on the matter and they have been very helpful so far.

I shall see what engineering have to say on the matter.

That is very interesting, and thanks. Let's hope things are looking up.

I'd just like to say thankyou very much to Smacman, Concorde Rules, C L - User, nanofrog, Smogsy, Virtual Rain, AZREOSpecialist, Dragonforce and the rest of you who have done so much to raise awareness of this issue.

Whatever the outcome, I really am very grateful for all you have done so far.
 
Thank god I found this topic!
I didn't knew there were so many people complaining about the early 2009 MacPro.I saw the post at macrumors about all this heating of CPU on audio playing and I thought maybe this is my case.Cause since last May I have the machine ,I had about 20 kernel panics,even when only application was in use(I don't remember which one each time,sometimes only transmission for example).ost of the times the KPs was like this:
Sat Jul 4 11:05:12 2009
Machine-check capabilities (cpu 5) 0x0000000000001c09:
family: 6 model: 26 stepping: 5 microcode: 15
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU W3520 @ 2.67GHz
9 error-reporting banks
threshold-based error status present
extended corrected memory error handling present
Machine-check status 0x0000000000000004:
machine-check in progress
MCA error-reporting registers:
IA32_MC0_STATUS(0x401): 0x0000000000000800 invalid
IA32_MC1_STATUS(0x405): 0x0000000000000800 invalid
IA32_MC2_STATUS(0x409): 0x0000000000000000 invalid
IA32_MC3_STATUS(0x40d): 0x0000000000000000 invalid
IA32_MC4_STATUS(0x411): 0x0000000000000000 invalid
IA32_MC5_STATUS(0x415): 0x0000000000000000 invalid
IA32_MC6_STATUS(0x419): 0x0000000000000000 invalid
IA32_MC7_STATUS(0x41d): 0x0000000000000000 invalid
Package 0 logged:
IA32_MC8_STATUS(0x421): 0xfe18b9000001009f valid
Channel number: 15 (unknown)
Memory Operation: read
Machine-specific error: Read ECC
COR_ERR_CNT: 17864
Status bits:
Processor context corrupt
ADDR register valid
MISC register valid
Error enabled
Uncorrected error
Error overflow
IA32_MC8_ADDR(0x422): 0x0000000033577100
IA32_MC8_MISC(0x423): 0x782ffa7700080482
DIMM: 0
Channel: 2
Syndrome: 0x782ffa77
panic(cpu 5 caller 0x001AAA68): Machine Check at 0x155a6534, thread:0x5ef5000, trapno:0x12, err:0x0, registers:
CR0: 0x80010033, CR2: 0x15890000, CR3: 0x011e0000, CR4: 0x00000660
EAX: 0x00003d5a, EBX: 0x155a839b, ECX: 0x0000ffe0, EDX: 0x00000010
ESP: 0xb01d9e40, EBP: 0xb01d9e58, ESI: 0x0000000c, EDI: 0x1589e0d0
EFL: 0x00000206, EIP: 0x155a6534

Backtrace (CPU 5), Frame : Return Address (4 potential args on stack)
0x427b6fb8 : 0x12b4c6 (0x45ec20 0x427b6fec 0x13355c 0x0)
0x427b7008 : 0x1aaa68 (0x468bc0 0x155a6534 0x5ef5000 0x12)
0x427b70e8 : 0x1a2553 (0x427b7100 0x401ff4ab 0x803fe956 0x7fd2ad)
No mapping exists for frame pointer
Backtrace terminated-invalid frame pointer 0xb01d9e58

BSD process name corresponding to current thread: StuffIt Expander

Mac OS version:
9J61

Kernel version:
Darwin Kernel Version 9.7.0: Tue Mar 31 22:52:17 PDT 2009; root:xnu-1228.12.14~1/RELEASE_I386
System model name: MacPro4,1 (Mac-F221BEC8)

System uptime in nanoseconds: 1089428758495
unloaded kexts:
com.apple.driver.AppleBluetoothHIDMouse 1.2.3f1 - last unloaded 913612625979
loaded kexts:
com.intego.iokit.VirusBarrierService 10.5.8
com.google.filesystems.fusefs 2.0.3
com.parallels.kext.prl_vnic 4.0 3844.408728
com.parallels.kext.prl_netbridge 4.0 3844.408728
com.parallels.kext.prl_usb_connect 4.0 3844.408728
com.parallels.kext.prl_hid_hook 4.0 3844.408728
com.parallels.kext.prl_hypervisor 4.0 3844.408728
com.Cycling74.driver.Soundflower 1.3.1
com.deepseasoftware.driver.CDSDAudioCaptureSupport 1.3
com.apple.driver.AppleBluetoothHIDMouse 1.2.3f1 - last loaded 922524123242
com.apple.driver.AppleHIDKeyboard 1.0.8b1
com.apple.driver.IOBluetoothHIDDriver 2.1.6f8
com.apple.filesystems.autofs 2.0.2
com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothSerialManager 2.1.6f8
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBHIDMouse 1.2.3f1
com.apple.driver.AppleMikeyHIDDriver 1.0.6
com.apple.driver.AppleUpstreamUserClient 2.7.5
com.apple.driver.AppleHDA 1.6.8a3
com.apple.driver.AppleMikeyDriver 1.6.8a3
com.apple.kext.ATY_Motmot 5.4.4
com.apple.driver.AppleHWSensor 1.9d0
com.apple.Dont_Steal_Mac_OS_X 6.0.3
com.apple.driver.AGPM 100.6.5
com.apple.driver.AppleTyMCEDriver 1.0.0d28
com.apple.driver.AppleHDAController 1.6.8a3
com.apple.driver.AudioIPCDriver 1.0.6
com.apple.ATIRadeonX2000 5.4.4
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBAudio 2.6.4b10
com.apple.driver.ACPI_SMC_PlatformPlugin 3.4.0d10
com.apple.driver.AppleSMBusPCI 1.0.1d1
com.apple.driver.AppleLPC 1.2.12
com.apple.iokit.IOFireWireIP 1.7.7
com.apple.driver.BroadcomUSBBluetoothHCIController 2.1.6f8
com.apple.driver.XsanFilter 2.7.91
com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIBlockStorage 1.2.1
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBMergeNub 3.4.3
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBMassStorageClass 2.0.6
com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIMultimediaCommandsDevice 2.0.9
com.apple.iokit.SCSITaskUserClient 2.0.9
com.apple.driver.AppleFWOHCI 3.8.2
com.apple.iokit.IOAHCISerialATAPI 1.1.1
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBHub 3.4.0
com.apple.driver.AirPortBrcm43xx 363.35.0
com.apple.driver.Intel82574L 1.0.1b40
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBUserClient 3.3.1
com.apple.driver.AppleAHCIPort 1.6.0
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBEHCI 3.4.3
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBUHCI 3.3.5
com.apple.driver.AppleEFINVRAM 1.2.0
com.apple.driver.AppleRTC 1.2.3
com.apple.driver.AppleHPET 1.4
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIPCI 1.2.4
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIButtons 1.2.4
com.apple.driver.AppleSMBIOS 1.4
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIEC 1.2.4
com.apple.driver.AppleAPIC 1.4
com.apple.security.seatbelt 107.12
com.apple.nke.applicationfirewall 1.6.77
com.apple.security.TMSafetyNet 3
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement 76.0.0
com.apple.driver.DiskImages 199
com.apple.BootCache 30.4
com.apple.iokit.IOSerialFamily 9.4
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBHIDDriver 3.2.2
com.apple.driver.AppleHIDMouse 1.2.3f1
com.apple.driver.DspFuncLib 1.6.8a3
com.apple.driver.AppleSMBusController 1.0.1d1
com.apple.iokit.IOHDAFamily 1.6.8a3
com.apple.iokit.IONDRVSupport 1.7.3
com.apple.iokit.IOGraphicsFamily 1.7.3
com.apple.iokit.IOAudioFamily 1.6.9fc3
com.apple.kext.OSvKernDSPLib 1.1
com.apple.driver.IOPlatformPluginFamily 3.4.0d10
com.apple.driver.AppleSMC 2.2.1d2
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBBluetoothHCIController 2.1.6f8
com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothFamily 2.1.6f8
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBComposite 3.2.0
com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIBlockCommandsDevice 2.0.9
com.apple.iokit.IOBDStorageFamily 1.5
com.apple.iokit.IODVDStorageFamily 1.5
com.apple.iokit.IOCDStorageFamily 1.5
com.apple.iokit.IOFireWireFamily 3.4.7
com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIArchitectureModelFamily 2.0.9
com.apple.iokit.IO80211Family 216.1
com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily 1.6.1
com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIFamily 1.5.0
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily 3.4.3
com.apple.driver.AppleEFIRuntime 1.2.0
com.apple.iokit.IOSMBusFamily 1.1
com.apple.iokit.IOStorageFamily 1.5.6
com.apple.iokit.IOHIDFamily 1.5.5
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIPlatform 1.2.4
com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily 2.6
com.apple.iokit.IOACPIFamily 1.2.0

Can anyone tell me if my situation is alike the ones almost everyone is complainning,about that audio-CPU temperature thing?
 
Eemzah,

Thanks for the info, today I spent 2 plus hours talking to Apple at AMK, firstly with an ordinary(noob) agent and then an Australian guy based in Singapore, as I consider that this issue is getting so much press, it was a good idea to raise it again.

I thought I was in luck as the Australian guy said at one stage they would send an engineer round to run some tests, however after some 5 minute pauses he rescinded that saying it was unlikely hardware related.

I have a MacPro 209 2.26 Octo, a 2009 MacMini 2.5GHz and a 2008 iMac 24, plus a 2.86 i7 hackintosh running on an MSI GD80 with 8GB Geil memory which outperforms the macPro and all four cores with hypertheading run 10-15 degrees cooler running the same apps and in the same room....

I was given the usual run around, however it is important that as many as possible raise this again so Apple have to listen, and although a very long thread with MacRumors and others highlighting the issue, how can it be ignored.

We of course have the standards commission here, we also have Al Gore on the Apple Board, perhaps we could raise the "Green" issue with him.

This MacPro is a great room heater we do not need here in Singapore, and within limits or not it uses an excess of power for doing nothing.

I'd love to see some Cinebench and Geekbench scores for your Hackintosh.
 
Fasten your seat belts and hold on! The 27" imac i7 I just purchased to replace my Dual G5 in my studio fans are ramping up like a rabid dog during audio use. I've opened up a case with Apple Pro Audio Support. I've also started a thread on the apple boards:

http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11023848#11023848

I've also emailed Chris at ARS. More information to follow as time allows it.

Peace

That's what happens when your top management executives only care about iPods and iPads and iDouche or whatever the hell they are going to try to sell to the masses. The rest of us have to take a back seat.
 
Thank god I found this topic!
I didn't knew there were so many people complaining about the early 2009 MacPro.I saw the post at macrumors about all this heating of CPU on audio playing and I thought maybe this is my case.Cause since last May I have the machine ,I had about 20 kernel panics,even when only application was in use(I don't remember which one each time,sometimes only transmission for example).ost of the times the KPs was like this:
Sat Jul 4 11:05:12 2009
Machine-check capabilities (cpu 5) 0x0000000000001c09:
family: 6 model: 26 stepping: 5 microcode: 15
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU W3520 @ 2.67GHz
9 error-reporting banks
threshold-based error status present
extended corrected memory error handling present
Machine-check status 0x0000000000000004:
machine-check in progress
MCA error-reporting registers:
IA32_MC0_STATUS(0x401): 0x0000000000000800 invalid
IA32_MC1_STATUS(0x405): 0x0000000000000800 invalid
IA32_MC2_STATUS(0x409): 0x0000000000000000 invalid
IA32_MC3_STATUS(0x40d): 0x0000000000000000 invalid
IA32_MC4_STATUS(0x411): 0x0000000000000000 invalid
IA32_MC5_STATUS(0x415): 0x0000000000000000 invalid
IA32_MC6_STATUS(0x419): 0x0000000000000000 invalid
IA32_MC7_STATUS(0x41d): 0x0000000000000000 invalid
Package 0 logged:
IA32_MC8_STATUS(0x421): 0xfe18b9000001009f valid
Channel number: 15 (unknown)
Memory Operation: read
Machine-specific error: Read ECC
COR_ERR_CNT: 17864
Status bits:
Processor context corrupt
ADDR register valid
MISC register valid
Error enabled
Uncorrected error
Error overflow
IA32_MC8_ADDR(0x422): 0x0000000033577100
IA32_MC8_MISC(0x423): 0x782ffa7700080482
DIMM: 0
Channel: 2

Syndrome: 0x782ffa77
panic(cpu 5 caller 0x001AAA68): Machine Check at 0x155a6534, thread:0x5ef5000, trapno:0x12, err:0x0, registers:
CR0: 0x80010033, CR2: 0x15890000, CR3: 0x011e0000, CR4: 0x00000660
EAX: 0x00003d5a, EBX: 0x155a839b, ECX: 0x0000ffe0, EDX: 0x00000010
ESP: 0xb01d9e40, EBP: 0xb01d9e58, ESI: 0x0000000c, EDI: 0x1589e0d0
EFL: 0x00000206, EIP: 0x155a6534
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Ya

This KP is received by many with Mac Pros including myself, I cured it by removing the Mem stick in Slot 3 which is
DIMM: 0
Channel: 2


Have not tried running my machine cooler with the Mem stick in that slot.

This Particular KP I believe is a CPU Mem call so heat could be the cause I suppose, somebody here will confirm that I would think.
 
I just emailed sjobsATappleDOTcom. I don't expect anything to happen... I'm just starting to lose hope after two months. Thanks for the incredible effort of Smacman, concorde rules, cl-user, nanofrog and basically everyone else that has made any contribution in clarifying this issue.
 
Okay everyone, feel free to be skeptical (I myself probably would be), but I spoke with a senior level Apple specialist about this on the phone today after having sent videos to him earlier this week.

Without going into details, both because they don't wish me to, nor was I privy to much actual detail, what I can say is that "Apple is investigating the issue" and everyone should be happy soon.
 
Okay everyone, feel free to be skeptical (I myself probably would be), but I spoke with a senior level Apple specialist about this on the phone today after having sent videos to him earlier this week.

Without going into details, both because they don't wish me to, nor was I privy to much actual detail, what I can say is that "Apple is investigating the issue" and everyone should be happy soon.

All we can do now is hope for the best!.
 
Can somebody please tell me the idle fan speeds of an 2.26GHz octad machine ?

I've got an eye on the fan control cause I think it's somehow broken. I've got 92° core temperatures and don't know if the fans run faster now.
 
Can somebody please tell me the idle fan speeds of an 2.26GHz octad machine ?

I've got an eye on the fan control cause I think it's somehow broken. I've got 92° core temperatures and don't know if the fans run faster now.

-
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2010-02-05 at 22.02.40.png
    Screen shot 2010-02-05 at 22.02.40.png
    56.3 KB · Views: 138
Merci!

And yes, despite the fact that my CPUs are just before shutting themselves down, the fans don't spin any faster.

SMC reset has already been done and didn't change anything. :confused:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.