Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Then ask the banks why they're complete idiots for supporting Apple Pay and accepting the fee.


I'm betting the British, Canadian, and Aussie financial institutions are paying next to nothing to Apple vs what the US institutions are paying (those institutions gave up next to nothing and Apple gained penetration.) I mean hell, the American institutions are so far behind that an incredibly high percentage of users still have to swipe their magnetic strip cards at merchants - no wonder they were welcoming Apple Pay - they had nothing before.
 
Its a duplication of effort. Apple has to maintain the NFC anyway. Why wouldn't the banks use what is already there instead of trying to build their own with the same tool. Secondly, what are the security implications of multiple party access to the NFC Chip in this case.

It's far cheaper for the banks to build their own tool than pay licensing to Apple in the long run. Also, Android phones already allow all apps to access the NFC chip, and I don't think it's as insecure as Apple wants everyone to think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hamado
True, they want the option to pass on the extra cost of paying Apple if one of their customers wishes to use Apple Pay. Then consumers would easily see why banks don't love it.

The choice is, do you let your local bank use the transaction fee so it can do things like give you awards? Or do you give Apple the money to take out of country and stash away? Over time, Apple Pay would siphon millions out of Australia.

You sound like Apple's going to charge Australian banks the same 0.15% that they charge US ones when in reality it'll probably be closer to the near zero that they charge the UK/Canadian/etc. ones. And if it gets more people to open accounts and carry balances, Apple Pay will still make the banks money anyway.
 
You sound like Apple's going to charge Australian banks the same 0.15% that they charge US ones when in reality it'll probably be closer to the near zero that they charge the UK/Canadian/etc. ones. And if it gets more people to open accounts and carry balances, Apple Pay will still make the banks money anyway.

How would it make the banks more money in Australia, when for all intents and purposes the big four already have practically the entire population as customers already?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kdarling
How would it make the banks more money in Australia, when for all intents and purposes the big four already have practically the entire population as customers already?

Sounds like a fair number are moving to ANZ right now since they're the only bank that supports it. It's probably more accurate to say that the other three would stop losing their share of the market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
Sounds like a fair number are moving to ANZ right now


Nothing more than ANZ PR spin ... hard to quantify by outside sources ... did the supposed newcomers just sign up with a $50 savings account to get access to Apple Pay OR did they move their entire account over i.e. mortgages, lines of credit, etc?

ANZ won't earn many fees from those McDonald's purchases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hamado
Nothing more than ANZ PR spin ... hard to quantify by outside sources ... did the supposed newcomers just sign up with a $50 savings account to get access to Apple Pay OR did they move their entire account over i.e. mortgages, lines of credit, etc?

ANZ won't earn many fees from those McDonald's purchases.

Why would they need to need to move anything other than credit cards and deposit accounts over for it to "count"? Besides, not everyone pays their entire balances off every month.
 
  • Like
Reactions: appledefenceforce
I hate the Australian banks, but its hilarious, Apple is just as greedy as the banks are in this case.
Well, with Apple, I am the customer, so our interests are aligned. Apple profits by selling me a great user experience and Apple Pay is simply an extension of that.
 
Well, with Apple, I am the customer, so our interests are aligned. Apple profits by selling me a great user experience and Apple Pay is simply an extension of that.

Well you can go ahead with that, I can hope that Apple grants access to the NFC chip so I can use the app my bank uses to make payments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hamado
Banks want to profit off of people using a secure payment feature that APPLE developed and maintains that they had no part in.

Apple Pay is neat and Apple did a great job integrating it with their hardware, but they didn't invent or develop NFC. They just repackaged an existing technology as "Apple Pay." They even did this well after Android phones offered the same feature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hamado
Another "until death does us apart" testimonial.
I put UX above all else and so does Apple. There's a reason why Apple is so successful. I want to feel good when using products and services.

Apple Pay is neat and Apple did a great job integrating it with their hardware, but they didn't invent or develop NFC. They just repackaged an existing technology as "Apple Pay." They even did this well after Android phones offered the same feature.

Yeah, it was called Google Wallet 4 years ago and it was a piece of crap. The whole reason digital payments has gotten any traction at all is because of Apple Pay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim and WiseAJ
Apple Pay is neat and Apple did a great job integrating it with their hardware, but they didn't invent or develop NFC. They just repackaged an existing technology as "Apple Pay." They even did this well after Android phones offered the same feature.

It's more then a simple repackaged product. Its tightly integrated with the secure element to protect the transaction. Android phones do not offer the same ease and security that Apple has developed with Apple Pay. Opening up the NFC chip to bank apps without compromising the existing level of security would require more development which costs money which is something the banks want Apple to do for free.

I don't see how the banks will win this in the end. The request will be denied. How can three Australian banks force an AMERICAN company to open up access to the NFC chip when the FBI can't even force Apple to unlock an iPhone.

Either sign up for Apple Pay or don't. Don't run crying to the government when people leave you for a bank that does when you had the exact same opportunity to offer it and didn't take it.
 
I think carrying around the convenience of Apple Pay anywhere you go can lead to spending more. At least it removes a "barrier" to spending.

Would be interesting to see some research into this!

Your intuition is correct.

Research in the UK a few years back showed that people tended to spend about 20% more on quickie purchases if they were using a convenient contactless card/device.

It was this statistic that helped lure American banks into paying Apple. Unfortunately, the banks did not figure into their calculations the fact that the US was lacking the same percentage of widespread contactless terminals, and a history of people using contactless cards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
Ok this is something that pisses me off but this is what apple doesn't realize.

For about 5 years now we have had PayPass and PayWave in our credit cards. I.E tap and go payments. We've had them for years so the idea that this technology is brand new is just absurd.

About 1.5 years to 2 years ago we got rid of signatures on cards (so now you MUST use a PIN) so we are pretty ahead with this unlike the US.

It's been a long time since I've had to swipe a card. I have just moved to the US and keep having to sign for stuff.

When Apple Pay came along I expected this to happen. Apple wants to charge them more and they are basically telling Apple to get lost.

Amex is weird in Australia. Places take it but not necessarily contactless because they didn't implement contactless chips in their cards right away. Places also charge you more to use Amex.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hamado
Oh the old "it's fine for a
[doublepost=1471616831][/doublepost]

That's irrelevant, because as a consumer I loose out due to the combined greed of the stupid banks and apple.

You have choice! No one forces you to be a consumer of a particular company! But of course you would aim for the best which comes with a price in a human world.
 
Ok this is something that pisses me off but this is what apple doesn't realize.

For about 5 years now we have had PayPass and PayWave in our credit cards. I.E tap and go payments. We've had them for years so the idea that this technology is brand new is just absurd.

About 1.5 years to 2 years ago we got rid of signatures on cards (so now you MUST use a PIN) so we are pretty ahead with this unlike the US.

It's been a long time since I've had to swipe a card. I have just moved to the US and keep having to sign for stuff.

When Apple Pay came along I expected this to happen. Apple wants to charge them more and they are basically telling Apple to get lost.

Amex is weird in Australia. Places take it but not necessarily contactless because they didn't implement contactless chips in their cards right away. Places also charge you more to use Amex.

As an American, I can say that I'm envious how the technology has evolved overseas and we're still using magnetic stripes at so many places (and others waiting for their EMV readers to get certified). That being said, a small chunk of places here took MasterCard PayPass/Visa PayWave/Amex ExpressPay/Discover Zip earlier, but only a few banks issued cards with antennas, and it never really caught on. I think the fear of "someone stealing your card info by standing near you" didn't help. Thankfully, the infrastructure was there and allowed a handful of places that weren't Apple Pay "partners" to work at launch (and work for people with Google Wallet before that). Meijer is a grocery/superstore chain in the Midwest and their store card was a contactless MasterCard—they made sure that every terminal and even the gas pumps had readers, which has been great for Apple Pay.

Typically, the signature requirement is set by a particular threshold by the store. It's annoying, especially since some chains and cashiers think that checking a signature counts as verification. Then there's the payment terminals that you sign and they never see either part of it—I have a friend who used to sign with cartoon character names or other things just to prove how much it didn't matter.

I can't speak for Amex in Australia, but I do know that some people had issues with how cards got coded in Apple Pay and how certain merchants "expected" them early on - a lot of MasterCard issues at Home Depot, and Discover has had some issues here and there. For the most part, Visa and Amex have been good here, but I can understand the similar troubles.
 
Apple Pay is not limited to $100 by many banks globally - it's been certified by EMVCo to be in the same category at a full chip and pin transaction (and being tokenised is more secure than most chip & pin transactions)

The Australian Banks ARE limiting it to $100 , in order to position it as being just like Pay Wave, and therefore nothing special.

If Apple were to give the Australian banks access to the NFC, they would either lose EMVCo certification at that level or have to pay to be re-certified with the bank's software installed as well.

The latter does not scale globally, and the former is letting Australian banks undermine the feature set of a global product.

Just re-iterating EMVCo certified Apple Pay to be the same security standard as chip & pin - so the transaction limit should be your daily transaction limit , not $100 (or whatever the local equivalent is) , and many banks world wide have done that already, just not the Australian ones.

Not true, I've made an $1,100 purchase yesterday at Bunnings on ApplePay and it worked fine.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.