I hate the Australian banks, but its hilarious, Apple is just as greedy as the banks are in this case.
Right, they should give some customers special pricing because they're greedy? And THAT is greedy to not do so?
I hate the Australian banks, but its hilarious, Apple is just as greedy as the banks are in this case.
Right, they should give some customers special pricing because they're greedy? And THAT is greedy to not do so?
True, but Apple is not demanding access to the proprietary products that Australian banks have created.
Hard to quantify the "leaving for other banks" particularly when there is pretty low penetration of iPhone models able to use Apple Pay.
Then ask the banks why they're complete idiots for supporting Apple Pay and accepting the fee.
Its a duplication of effort. Apple has to maintain the NFC anyway. Why wouldn't the banks use what is already there instead of trying to build their own with the same tool. Secondly, what are the security implications of multiple party access to the NFC Chip in this case.
True, they want the option to pass on the extra cost of paying Apple if one of their customers wishes to use Apple Pay. Then consumers would easily see why banks don't love it.
The choice is, do you let your local bank use the transaction fee so it can do things like give you awards? Or do you give Apple the money to take out of country and stash away? Over time, Apple Pay would siphon millions out of Australia.
You sound like Apple's going to charge Australian banks the same 0.15% that they charge US ones when in reality it'll probably be closer to the near zero that they charge the UK/Canadian/etc. ones. And if it gets more people to open accounts and carry balances, Apple Pay will still make the banks money anyway.
How would it make the banks more money in Australia, when for all intents and purposes the big four already have practically the entire population as customers already?
Sounds like a fair number are moving to ANZ right now
Nothing more than ANZ PR spin ... hard to quantify by outside sources ... did the supposed newcomers just sign up with a $50 savings account to get access to Apple Pay OR did they move their entire account over i.e. mortgages, lines of credit, etc?
ANZ won't earn many fees from those McDonald's purchases.
Well, with Apple, I am the customer, so our interests are aligned. Apple profits by selling me a great user experience and Apple Pay is simply an extension of that.I hate the Australian banks, but its hilarious, Apple is just as greedy as the banks are in this case.
Well, with Apple, I am the customer, so our interests are aligned. Apple profits by selling me a great user experience and Apple Pay is simply an extension of that.
Wouldn't have it any other way.Another "until death does us apart" testimonial.
Well, with Apple, I am the customer, so our interests are aligned. Apple profits by selling me a great user experience and Apple Pay is simply an extension of that.
One can always hope.Well you can go ahead with that, I can hope that Apple grants access to the NFC chip so I can use the app my bank uses to make payments.
Banks want to profit off of people using a secure payment feature that APPLE developed and maintains that they had no part in.
I put UX above all else and so does Apple. There's a reason why Apple is so successful. I want to feel good when using products and services.Another "until death does us apart" testimonial.
Apple Pay is neat and Apple did a great job integrating it with their hardware, but they didn't invent or develop NFC. They just repackaged an existing technology as "Apple Pay." They even did this well after Android phones offered the same feature.
Apple Pay is neat and Apple did a great job integrating it with their hardware, but they didn't invent or develop NFC. They just repackaged an existing technology as "Apple Pay." They even did this well after Android phones offered the same feature.
I think carrying around the convenience of Apple Pay anywhere you go can lead to spending more. At least it removes a "barrier" to spending.
Would be interesting to see some research into this!
Oh the old "it's fine for a
[doublepost=1471616831][/doublepost]
That's irrelevant, because as a consumer I loose out due to the combined greed of the stupid banks and apple.
Ok this is something that pisses me off but this is what apple doesn't realize.
For about 5 years now we have had PayPass and PayWave in our credit cards. I.E tap and go payments. We've had them for years so the idea that this technology is brand new is just absurd.
About 1.5 years to 2 years ago we got rid of signatures on cards (so now you MUST use a PIN) so we are pretty ahead with this unlike the US.
It's been a long time since I've had to swipe a card. I have just moved to the US and keep having to sign for stuff.
When Apple Pay came along I expected this to happen. Apple wants to charge them more and they are basically telling Apple to get lost.
Amex is weird in Australia. Places take it but not necessarily contactless because they didn't implement contactless chips in their cards right away. Places also charge you more to use Amex.
Apple Pay is not limited to $100 by many banks globally - it's been certified by EMVCo to be in the same category at a full chip and pin transaction (and being tokenised is more secure than most chip & pin transactions)
The Australian Banks ARE limiting it to $100 , in order to position it as being just like Pay Wave, and therefore nothing special.
If Apple were to give the Australian banks access to the NFC, they would either lose EMVCo certification at that level or have to pay to be re-certified with the bank's software installed as well.
The latter does not scale globally, and the former is letting Australian banks undermine the feature set of a global product.
Just re-iterating EMVCo certified Apple Pay to be the same security standard as chip & pin - so the transaction limit should be your daily transaction limit , not $100 (or whatever the local equivalent is) , and many banks world wide have done that already, just not the Australian ones.