I agree with this completely (also that age and have been playing video games since I was 2).I've been playing video games since I was 2 years old. I'm 43 now and this is easily the best RPG I've ever played, and one of the best video games of all time.
Metal works differently on Radeon GPUs. They might not test it. Maybe because pretty much only the last generation of Intels is still supported by Apple.Umm... the system requirements previously said i7, yet now they're saying M1? I have an i9, so am I suddenly blocked from the game now that it's out of early access?
Edit: It's still compiled as universal, at least for now.
True. Their whole 8GB nonsense is pure greed and nonsense. 8GB is beyond pathetic in 2023.This is why Apple needs to make 16GB of RAM standard across the board if they're truly serious about gaming on the Mac.
Thatās true from a purely consumer standpoint, but OP is right if youāre Apple and want more games running on Mac. A lot of people use Macs as study/work/design machines (which 8GB could be perfectly adequate for) but may occasionally play a game or two if their machines are up to the task. More Macs with higher end specs means more potential customers for Mac games, and thus more developer interest in ports.Why should apple configure its lowest end configuration Mac to be gaming machines. That is not the rule of thumb in PC so why should it be that way for Mac? Gaming PC are high end, high performance machines. Gaming machines are incredibly computers but they are far from lowest-cost entry-level offerings.
If You donāt like the lowest end Mac configuration then donāt buy them. If people stopped buying 8GB configuration, Apple would stop offering them.
Iām not going into the non-upgradable Apple memory argument except that limitation is known and shouldnāt be a surprise. Think before you buy. If you are unhappy, frustrated or angry about the situation then protest with your pocketbook.
If only Starfield and Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty were released on the Mac too, then all the really great 2023 RPGs would be playable on Apple Silicon. š¤
No, this is just one reason why folks buying new Macs should up their choice of RAM amount, and Apple should continue to make higher RAM levels available [like they already do with 96 GB available in MBPs]. It says nothing about whether or not an 8 GB option should exist for granny with email-only and K-12 admins, both needing lowest cost boxes.This is why Apple needs to make 16GB of RAM standard across the board if they're truly serious about gaming on the Mac.
Nintendo Switch has a chip with poor performance. Your argument already failed. Not all games are highend especially since the majority of people are still using mid to low-end computers. You can check the fact from Steam.Why should apple configure its lowest end configuration Mac to be gaming machines. That is not the rule of thumb in PC so why should it be that way for Mac? Gaming PC are high end, high performance machines. Gaming machines are incredibly computers but they are far from lowest-cost entry-level offerings.
If You donāt like the lowest end Mac configuration then donāt buy them. If people stopped buying 8GB configuration, Apple would stop offering them.
Iām not going into the non-upgradable Apple memory argument except that limitation is known and shouldnāt be a surprise. Think before you buy. If you are unhappy, frustrated or angry about the situation then protest with your pocketbook.
8GB is a joke and yet, upgrading to 16GB for almost $200 is also a joke. Do you really think the memory chip is expensive to add? Not at all. All Macs should start at 16GB with a same price.No, this is just one reason why folks buying new Macs should up their choice of RAM amount, and Apple should continue to make higher RAM levels available [like they already do with 96 GB available in MBPs]. It says nothing about whether or not an 8 GB option should exist for granny with email-only and K-12 admins, both needing lowest cost boxes.
We disagree. I will continue to argueWho says a thin and light laptop that comes without a fan has to be the main gaming rig? Why can't it be used when the person is away from their main gaming rig and just wants to play a quick game to kill some time?
A smartphone isn't the main gaming rig for a lot of people, yet many use it to play games while on the move. It's embarrassing that the iPhone 15 Pro has just as much memory as the base MacBook Air.
It no doubt depends on what well enough is to you, and perhaps also how much RAM is in the M2 Max. I may try it with 96 GB, but am not an experienced gamer so I probably cannot really differentiate good/bad performance.Might grab this and run on M2 Max. Should run well enough?
IMO 8 GB is not a joke; Mac OS makes it work for undemanding usages. But I certainly agree it would be helpful if RAM upgrading cost less.8GB is a joke and yet, upgrading to 16GB for almost $200 is also a joke. Do you really think the memory chip is expensive to add? Not at all. All Macs should start at 16GB with a same price.
We disagree. I will continue to argue
A) that users need to choose more RAM when buying new boxes, and
B) that Apple needs to give users a cheap low-RAM choice (currently 8 GB) and also fat RAM options (currently 96 GB in MBPs and 24 GB in lower-end MBAs).
Personally I chose 96 even though 64 would totally suffice at this stage of my M2 MBP's life cycle.
Not all games are highend
Actually try iTunes in 2003, the same as Steam. Then again as for Steam that was JUST for Valveās games and didnāt open up to 3rd parties until 2005 for limited runs but kept expanding. For Mac users the Mac App Store is just a detached iTunesā¦Uhā¦what? Steam isnāt real? Of all the app stores, Steam may be the most real. It pre-dates the ārealā (I presume you mean the Mac App Store) by at least seven years. In many ways it was the FIRST App Store for games.
Yep, M1 and M2 gets crushed anyway, doesnāt worth the money for gaming.I don't know why anyone would be seriously considering a thin and light laptop that comes without a fan as a gaming rig? Spend the $200 on a used PS4 or a Nintendo switch and you'll be much happier.
I wouldnāt add Baldurās Gate to the upper end of high end games in terms of graphics, but it will make Apple devices sweat.But this thread is about Baldurās Gate 3, which is a high end game
I've been playing video games since I was 2 years old. I'm 43 now and this is easily the best RPG I've ever played, and one of the best video games of all time.
I think Apple wants the Mac to be at least adequate for gaming. They wouldnāt have released a Wine-based porting app if they were content with the current situation. Since the Mac uses Apple Silicon now if it isnāt adequate at gaming it makes iOS look bad by comparison.I won't think Apple will ever be truly serious about gaming on the Mac (feels like a contradictio in terminis....)
Apple love gaming on iOS as it delivers easy money.
The Mac? Nah... never has been, never will. And I am saying this as someone who refuses to buy a gaming PC, as I love to "play" whatever I can on my Mac Studio....
True. Their whole 8GB nonsense is pure greed and nonsense. 8GB is beyond pathetic in 2023.
Yes, your i9 isn't powerful enough. šUmm... the system requirements previously said i7, yet now they're saying M1? I have an i9, so am I suddenly blocked from the game now that it's out of early access?
Edit: It's still compiled as universal, at least for now.