MacNut said:So now we know who the Tigers will massacre. This will be a true blood bath of a series.
IJ Reilly said:Methinks you are correct. I'm an NL guy, but I don't give the Cards much of a chance against the Tigers.
MacNut said:The Cardinals don't have a good track record in the World Series. Might we see another sweep?
We'll remember how they didn't deserve to be in the playoffs.yg17 said:Anything's possible....no one ever thought the Cards would make it past the NLDS
xsedrinam said:So much for taking the fam to the ballpark. Think I'll watch it on TV, even if it has to be FOX.
xsedrinam said:Oh, and I think Edmonds is a fluff, this year. He doesn't play hurt, he just gets hurt. He clearly got called off the fly ball and ran through the light. He gets behind the count too much, and he hasn't delivered. I'll change my tune if he shows up in the Series, but right now, I ain't too high on him, pretty swing and all.
He's been injury prone afaiw since his CA/Anaheim days, and he will make the occasional golden glove type catch or throw. But his numbers have been down for two seasons in STL since coming there in 2000. With the Cards he's turned in 20+HR except for this year (19). Last two seasons his BA has fallen (.263 and .257) to his lowest since his rookie year, and what STL has needed from him has been consistency with slugging in the clutch. At .471 this year, his numbers just aren't there.aloofman said:He's had a lot of injuries this year, to the point where it's a little surprising that he's playing so much. And he had a great catch a few games ago, over the shoulder, then bouncing off the center field wall.
Ya, I do, but I travel a lot. Just flew back in last night, so I gotta pull for the Redbirds. Once a Cards fan.....yg17 said:lol, how did you plan to pull that off anyways, don't you live in South America? Or am I thinking of someone else![]()
NY left a lot of men on base, last night, and Rolen's wild throw didn't help the cause, but the bullpen came through.yg17 said:And yeah, Wainright had me nearly crapping myself after loading the bases and beltran up to bat, but we pulled through
xsedrinam said:There have been like 3+ double plays to end the inning and Edmonds' fundamental base running error could have cost us again, last night.
xsedrinam said:I still think he has one of the prettiest swings (Ted Williamsish) in the game, but pretty won't deliver runs. It's always a treat when a lower batting order player (Molina) steps up, but if STL has any chance at all against the Tigers, they're going to have to get some better numbers going from their 1-5 hitters, not to mention pitching.
All the way from the Gas House Gang to '82, the last year STL won it all, they've had at least two running threats on the bases. Brock and Coleman were fun to watch in mid 80's.aloofman said:I think the double plays are a function of how slow the Cards are. Except maybe for Eckstein, they're a pretty slow team.
Point well taken. My grievances rise out of a higher expectation of him since I probably have believed he is/was that good. It's just a pet peeve with the frustrated coach in me to see a hitter consistently get behind 0-2, especially when they chase balls high and outside.aloofman said:I'm sure I'm sounding like an Edmonds fanboy here, but I think you have to put him in perspective. How many other centerfielders have power? I mean, any power? He's still one of the most productive hitters at his position. I saw a sabermetric article a few years ago that even made a semi-convincing argument that Edmonds is a future HOFer. Statistically, Bernie Williams is the only CF of the last 10 years to even approach him hitting-wise, and probably only Torii Hunter and Andruw Jones are up there defensively over that time.
And I don't have to tell you that the whole Cards' lineup is a shadow of their recent teams. Between injuries and Pujols being the only other power threat in the lineup, it's not surprising that he hasn't hit as well.
Again, not to make excuses for him, but if you look at the big picture, he's been one of the top centerfielders in the game. And even though his productivity is down, how many are better? Please don't make me recount for you how many balls Kenny Lofton misplayed this year in CF this year. It was a horror show. Driving Edmonds out of Anaheim was a dumb move by the Angels.
thedude110 said:So, as I hope I've made clear over the last few pages, I like the Tigers. A lot.
But I'm not sure they're going to roll over the Cards, and I'm somewhat confused that, all of a sudden, they're the "favorites." They win the ALCS and they're nothing, a week happens and they're favorites?
Tigers in 6 or 7, and a much more competitive series than most think ...
emw said:No one even thought they'd make it past San Diego, so it could be "their" year. I guess we'll soon find out.
Honestly, that's all I'm hoping to see is two teams showing up with their best efforts to play well in a World Series. Forget the 4-0 sweeps and all that stuff. It's history.aloofman said:No matter how good the players seem to be, they actually have to play that well to win, and it doesn't always happen. That, and I want to watch a dramatic series instead of a whitewash.
It'd be a nice inauguration for the new ballpark.emw said:No one even thought they'd make it past San Diego, so it could be "their" year. I guess we'll soon find out.
IJ Reilly said:I think it's because they so handily disposed of their AL opposition, including teams who won 97 and 93 games this season, compared to the Cards' 83 season victories. Adding to that, they've had several days rest, and they get to open at home. So I think they deserve to be regarded as the favorites.
I love all the paper analysis and stats that go on prior to a series like this one. The odds makers surely allude to it, but in the end, it means little on game day. MLB (Jim Molony) has the Tigers advantaged over STL 8-4 with one draw in the following analysis. But S.I. didn't give them a chance against SD.thedude110 said:I mean, I think you're right. In the large scheme of things, the Tigers are the better team, and they're the team that's more likely to win.
<snip>
Such that, and I think you'd agree, in a short series the Cardinals have a good chance to not just hang around, but to win.