See here's the thing that a lot of people seem to miss.. even during the Tiger's infamous 2003 season of 43-119 their payroll was nearly $50 million. During the Red Wings' peak years, their payroll was comparable (I don't have exact numbers but $60 million would be a fair estimate). $60 million in the NHL gets you the #1 payroll in the league. $50-60 million in the MLB gets you in the bottom third of the league in terms of payroll. Illitch was technically spending the same amount in payroll on his two teams... but what those two payrolls bought was completely different. Simply put, the economic realities of the two leagues are different.aloofman said:If the Tigers owner spent as much as it took to contend the way he as for the Red Wings, they'd have been up there with the Red Sox and Yankees years ago. But maybe having a championship hockey team gets you farther in Detroit.
Now if the argument was "Illitch should have spent on the Tigers a league-relative amount of payroll as he did on the Red Wings"... fine. But that would mean a $219 million payroll for the Tigers.