Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Oh, and let's be sure to ignore the irony of a British government funded piece complaining about the exploitation of foreign peoples... India anyone?

Not to mention the death camps invented for the second Boer war...

The British government does not fund the BBC.
 
Nope, gnasher made the first statement, the burden of proof is on him.

That's exactly what my eight year old said.

----------

I'm a physician and I routinely work 80+ hour weeks (and 100+ hour weeks during residency). These factory workers have it good! Maybe the BBC should produce a documentary on overworked physicians (something that actually matters).

And I'll bet you make only $10 a day too!! Poor, poor physicians!!
 
Replace Apple with Samsung in this piece and this comments thread would be entirely different. Biased much?

Little doubt Panorama will have sensationalised it though, go back 15 years and it wasn't nearly as knee jerk and exhibited a little more journalistic integrity.
 
Last edited:
The British government does not fund the BBC.

Get you facts right :eek:

The BBC is established under a Royal Charter[6] and operates under its Agreement with the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport.[7] Its work is funded principally by an annual television licence fee[8] which is charged to all British households, companies, and organisations using any type of equipment to receive live television broadcasts.[9] The fee is set by the British Government, agreed by Parliament,[10] and used to fund the BBC's extensive radio, TV, and online services covering the nations and regions of the UK. From 1 April 2014 it also funds the BBC World Service, which provides comprehensive TV, radio, and online services in Arabic, and Persian, and broadcasts in 28 languages. Around a quarter of BBC revenues come from its commercial arm BBC Worldwide Ltd. which sells BBC programmes and services internationally and also distributes the BBC's international 24-hour English language news services BBC World News and BBC.com, provided by BBC Global News Ltd.
 
Objective. I've worked with the BBC before, never heard of them using unpaid interns (at least in the place I worked). So I'm genuinely curious.

Ok. I just hate petty scraps.

Just for clarity, unpaid internships are perfectly fine, but bashing a company for paying its workers too little when they continue to work there voluntarily, while using unpaid interns to assemble that attack is a bit absurd.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/...BBC-says-its-6000-interns-have-no-rights.html
 
Get you facts right :eek:

The BBC is established under a Royal Charter[6] and operates under its Agreement with the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport.[7] Its work is funded principally by an annual television licence fee[8] which is charged to all British households, companies, and organisations using any type of equipment to receive live television broadcasts.[9] The fee is set by the British Government, agreed by Parliament,[10] and used to fund the BBC's extensive radio, TV, and online services covering the nations and regions of the UK. From 1 April 2014 it also funds the BBC World Service, which provides comprehensive TV, radio, and online services in Arabic, and Persian, and broadcasts in 28 languages. Around a quarter of BBC revenues come from its commercial arm BBC Worldwide Ltd. which sells BBC programmes and services internationally and also distributes the BBC's international 24-hour English language news services BBC World News and BBC.com, provided by BBC Global News Ltd.

I guess you copied and pasted the above without actually reading it.

The British government does NOT fund the BBC.

The British government does set the licence fee charge as it's effectively another form of compulsory taxation but they don't contribute towards it. The fee is paid by every household in the UK.
 
The iPlayer does not show ads.

BBC Shop does not sell Panorama documentaries.

The BBC is funded by every household in the UK who pay an annual licence fee. They don't show any ads and as such have no incentive to chase ratings. They are a public service broadcaster.

BBC journalists are widely regarded as some of the best journalists in the world with a strict impartiality. In fact it's the law here that UK based TV broadcasters must maintain a fair and even balance when reporting stories.

This program was not intended to attack Apple or the US. It was intended to test Tim Cook's claims that Apple has a higher moral compass than other tech companies by ensuring its supply chain workers are properly treated.

Yawn. It's about ratings. The BBC doesn't really care about Chinese factory workers any more than most of the people posting here.
 
Because everything the BBC reported in this documentary has been verified as the truth? I hope if you own any Apple products you dispose of them straight away. That's the only moral thing to do, right?

I would trust their word over a money grabbing corporation or YOU

----------

Yawn. It's about ratings. The BBC doesn't really care about Chinese factory workers any more than most of the people posting here.

Stop talking rubbish I doubt you even watched the documentary
 
The problem is really that Apple in the person of Tim Cook likes to pontificate about the high standards they set for these factories and the intense monitoring that they do to control it. That is why the BBC went after Apple.

Yeah I do agree with you there. As others here have pointed out as well, Apple has set themselves up for criticism by playing the saint. And it seems the likes of Pegatron are taking full advantage.
 
Yawn. It's about ratings. The BBC doesn't really care about Chinese factory workers any more than most of the people posting here.

Adding "Yawn" to your reply is very arrogant and I thought you were better than that.

I realise it's difficult for Americans to understand the concept of public service broadcasting where not everything is about ratings.

How sad it must be to have such a cynical outlook on life. The BBC does care about those Chinese workers and if like me you routinely watched the BBC every day you would appreciate that some journalists are in it to expose the truth rather than chase ratings.
 
I should make a documentary about the engineers at apple too.

Look at these sleepless nights!

lol

----------

You forgot to mention that Apple buys tin ore from the Indonesian island of Bangka, where children as young as 12 are involved in gathering tin ore. The documentary did highlight the fact that Apple is not alone in doing this with many other tech companies doing the same.

The documentary also highlighted that Apple does not directly buy tin ore from the Indonesian Island because theres no way of knowing where it gets distributed once piped through. Its all very skewed.
 
Oh, and let's be sure to ignore the irony of a British government funded piece complaining about the exploitation of foreign peoples... India anyone?

Not to mention the death camps invented for the second Boer war...

More lies the British citizens fund the bbc and its 2014 but if you want to get like that shall we mention native Americans and African Americans ?

And they were not death camps they were the first concentration camps

----------

It's obvious the bbc have researched this a damn sight more then the angry Americans on here have researched the bbc
 
Wow, I can't imagine people have mandatory overtime. Can you imagine a 12 hour work day. Sounds like slavery. One day they too will go to a 32 hour work week and all will be blissfully beautiful in a comfortable utopia that all of humanity are intitled to.

----------

Adding "Yawn" to your reply is very arrogant and I thought you were better than that.

I realise it's difficult for Americans to understand the concept of public service broadcasting where not everything is about ratings.

How sad it must be to have such a cynical outlook on life. The BBC does care about those Chinese workers and if like me you routinely watched the BBC every day you would appreciate that some journalists are in it to expose the truth rather than chase ratings.

I second that Yawn.
 
So instead of presenting these findings to Apple and actually trying to improve the situation, they are going to capitalize on it by making a "documentary" for more $$$? Disgusting.
What's really disgusting is that some folk believe shooting the messenger is the adoption of the moral high ground.
 
Wow, I can't imagine people have mandatory overtime. Can you imagine a 12 hour work day. Sounds like slavery. One day they too will go to a 32 hour work week and all will be blissfully beautiful in a comfortable utopia that all of humanity are intitled to.

No one here is saying that working long hours is inhumane in and of itself. There's nothing wrong with working over 40 hours a week, so long as you're being compensated for it.
 
Nice, interesting, well written article.

I'm a bit skeptical about the BBC documentary and what's exactly Apple's responsibility, but MR and Juiie delivered a nice report. Kudos!
 
Why is it Apple's fault, its like saying we are at fault if we buy a product from a company who doesn't look after their staff. How about Nike's child labour factories.

BBC is a joke

I don't buy Nike

----------

It's pretty screwed up to see how the community here defends these kind of conditions just because it focuses on Apple. Seriously, what is wrong with you people? This is just sad.

I was thinking the same. And most of these people would probably never survive these work conditions for a single day.
 
It;s just my observation that many Apple forums have a critical mass of social Darwinists, self-styled eugenics experts, Ayn Rand groupies, and those who have political beliefs somewhere to the right of Marie Antoinette.

I have no idea why this is so, but let's just say if this convo took place in android forums it would be very different. Most hardcore android enthusiasts are for whatever reason very liberal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVaTl2kW6YU
 
Last edited:
My father was a medic and for weeks in a row he had to work 60 or more hours... And he worked with a LOT more delicate material... :D

Heck... I'm a Web Designer and in some months i work every freaking weeks a lot more than 60 hours... Including full weekends. I've fallen asleep on my desk many times... Can someone please call BBC?

It's not uncommon in our ocidental society for people to work 10-12-14 hours per day...


This is their job, no one forces them to be there... They are not slaves. And it has to be put down to perspective... And that perspective can be achieved by asking a simple question: Why they don't leave? And most of the times, the answer is because it would be a LOT hard to find better... Plus you cannot achieve that perspective when comparing 2 very different cultures and try to make them work the same way.. That will not happen.

And this is no different from Samsung, Nike, and many other brands...
 
While Apple (and every other company) should make every effort to demand fair conditions at companies that undertake contracted work for them, I don't believe they are responsible for policing these OTHER companies.

I'm sure many on their legal team put in much longer hours. Perhaps that should be the focus?
 
This is quite an ill-conceived answer. It is widely known that Apple exerts exacting control over its suppliers and makes a great deal of fanfare about its ethical policy. Apple could do a great deal to further improve worker conditions, and as it has proved in the past it can spend a lot of money and take a lot of the kudos for making such changes.

It's a realistic answer. Be honest: if Apple were completely forcing the issue, there would be no end to the cries of how they are abusing their power and they don't have the right to run other companies, even if it's for a noble purpose. As I said, they can apply pressure, which they are apparently doing. But they do need to engage in something of a balancing act, so they can work toward improving conditions while still getting the product out (which a large number of people depend on for their livelihood, not only factory workers), and not completely alienating their suppliers. It's willfully ignorant to think that in the real world, you can get ideal results immediately. Let's see how things are going a few years from now.

--Eric
 
Does BBC know Pegatron is a Taiwanese company which went to mainland China to set up factories? Does BBC know Taiwan think itself more advanced than mainland China? So instead of blaming China/Chinese government/Apple, why can't BBC get in touch with a Pegatron executive and ask questions and let use know the answers? So I think BBC has other hidden motives. It really does not care Chinese workers. This is what I have observed of the western media over the years. They are not honest. They are really evil in themselves.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.