This is an outrage I want Tim sacked post haste, dirty filthy apple.
Lots of Americans in here being patriotic rather then sensible.
Tim needs to go he's a liar.
What are you trying to do, a parody of the Red Queen?
This is an outrage I want Tim sacked post haste, dirty filthy apple.
Lots of Americans in here being patriotic rather then sensible.
Tim needs to go he's a liar.
Oh, and let's be sure to ignore the irony of a British government funded piece complaining about the exploitation of foreign peoples... India anyone?
Not to mention the death camps invented for the second Boer war...
The British government does not fund the BBC.
Nope, gnasher made the first statement, the burden of proof is on him.
I'm a physician and I routinely work 80+ hour weeks (and 100+ hour weeks during residency). These factory workers have it good! Maybe the BBC should produce a documentary on overworked physicians (something that actually matters).
The British government does not fund the BBC.
Objective. I've worked with the BBC before, never heard of them using unpaid interns (at least in the place I worked). So I'm genuinely curious.
Get you facts right
The BBC is established under a Royal Charter[6] and operates under its Agreement with the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport.[7] Its work is funded principally by an annual television licence fee[8] which is charged to all British households, companies, and organisations using any type of equipment to receive live television broadcasts.[9] The fee is set by the British Government, agreed by Parliament,[10] and used to fund the BBC's extensive radio, TV, and online services covering the nations and regions of the UK. From 1 April 2014 it also funds the BBC World Service, which provides comprehensive TV, radio, and online services in Arabic, and Persian, and broadcasts in 28 languages. Around a quarter of BBC revenues come from its commercial arm BBC Worldwide Ltd. which sells BBC programmes and services internationally and also distributes the BBC's international 24-hour English language news services BBC World News and BBC.com, provided by BBC Global News Ltd.
The iPlayer does not show ads.
BBC Shop does not sell Panorama documentaries.
The BBC is funded by every household in the UK who pay an annual licence fee. They don't show any ads and as such have no incentive to chase ratings. They are a public service broadcaster.
BBC journalists are widely regarded as some of the best journalists in the world with a strict impartiality. In fact it's the law here that UK based TV broadcasters must maintain a fair and even balance when reporting stories.
This program was not intended to attack Apple or the US. It was intended to test Tim Cook's claims that Apple has a higher moral compass than other tech companies by ensuring its supply chain workers are properly treated.
Because everything the BBC reported in this documentary has been verified as the truth? I hope if you own any Apple products you dispose of them straight away. That's the only moral thing to do, right?
Yawn. It's about ratings. The BBC doesn't really care about Chinese factory workers any more than most of the people posting here.
The problem is really that Apple in the person of Tim Cook likes to pontificate about the high standards they set for these factories and the intense monitoring that they do to control it. That is why the BBC went after Apple.
Yawn. It's about ratings. The BBC doesn't really care about Chinese factory workers any more than most of the people posting here.
I should make a documentary about the engineers at apple too.
Look at these sleepless nights!
You forgot to mention that Apple buys tin ore from the Indonesian island of Bangka, where children as young as 12 are involved in gathering tin ore. The documentary did highlight the fact that Apple is not alone in doing this with many other tech companies doing the same.
Oh, and let's be sure to ignore the irony of a British government funded piece complaining about the exploitation of foreign peoples... India anyone?
Not to mention the death camps invented for the second Boer war...
Adding "Yawn" to your reply is very arrogant and I thought you were better than that.
I realise it's difficult for Americans to understand the concept of public service broadcasting where not everything is about ratings.
How sad it must be to have such a cynical outlook on life. The BBC does care about those Chinese workers and if like me you routinely watched the BBC every day you would appreciate that some journalists are in it to expose the truth rather than chase ratings.
What's really disgusting is that some folk believe shooting the messenger is the adoption of the moral high ground.So instead of presenting these findings to Apple and actually trying to improve the situation, they are going to capitalize on it by making a "documentary" for more $$$? Disgusting.
Wow, I can't imagine people have mandatory overtime. Can you imagine a 12 hour work day. Sounds like slavery. One day they too will go to a 32 hour work week and all will be blissfully beautiful in a comfortable utopia that all of humanity are intitled to.
Replace Apple with Samsung in this piece and this comments thread would be entirely different. Biased much?
Why is it Apple's fault, its like saying we are at fault if we buy a product from a company who doesn't look after their staff. How about Nike's child labour factories.
BBC is a joke
It's pretty screwed up to see how the community here defends these kind of conditions just because it focuses on Apple. Seriously, what is wrong with you people? This is just sad.
This is quite an ill-conceived answer. It is widely known that Apple exerts exacting control over its suppliers and makes a great deal of fanfare about its ethical policy. Apple could do a great deal to further improve worker conditions, and as it has proved in the past it can spend a lot of money and take a lot of the kudos for making such changes.