Biggest radio station that you cannot dial into on your radio. Sounds legit.
Only if you use late nineteenth century terminology. Same goes for ‘headphone jack’.
Biggest radio station that you cannot dial into on your radio. Sounds legit.
Ha ha ha, my first thought as well...some creative metrics used to define parameters that show Beats 1 to be first of all a "radio station" and second of all the "biggest.""It's the biggest ! But we won't give you any information to verify our claim"
I'm sure you can find something online that plays that. My wife has no problem finding it when she wants to hear it. Expecting a music service like Beats 1 that's all about discovering new music to play it... well, that's asking a bit much.Damn, I guess I am a walking zombie as I listen to Bach, Beethoven, Chopin, Vivaldi, Haydn.....
It is getting harder and harder to find any "radio" that plays these...
What's wrong with Taylor Swift? Music taste is subjective, or course. But whatever else, 1989 is a great pop album.
Not everyone likes all genres, but all genres, including pop, have great music.
You say that music should embrace diversity, and then in the same breath dismiss part of that very diversity.
Honestly, I still prefer music curated by a human. A computer can't get a feel for the music, so while it can recommend me stuff other people with similar tastes like, it can't introduce me to something new, or something I haven't heard yet, that may blow my mind.I have absolutely no use for Beats 1. For everyone on here complaining about it, I absolutely get your point, but changing the format or including more variety is not really the answer. We don't need a curated radio station anymore!
Guys, we now have devices in our pockets that can play virtually any song at a moment's notice, and whether it's Apple Music, Google, or Spotify, we have access to great algorithms and curated playlists that fit exactly what we like to listen to. And if you don't like what comes up, just hit the skip button!
Stop worrying about a stupid curated radio station and trying to change what songs they play and just go listen to the songs you like the most. Life is too short!
I havee iTunes on Windows and it has a jazz genre in the app. Maybe your app needs to be updated?
Also, as mentioned above, the jazz genre also appears in the app on my iPhone.
This is the most arrogant, hipster thing I've ever read. You know enough about Drake to know that he was on DeGrassi but think claiming that you've avoided ever hearing one of his songs during the last decade makes you sound cool? No one cares what you listen to or what you like. But enjoy your "carefully curated" Pandora stations that play the same 15 songs on repeat.
The salesman at my local Toyota dealership told me that nothing beats a Toyota!"It's the biggest ! But we won't give you any information to verify our claim"
Just more defensiveness on your part. My original post, a few minutes before yours, apparently shook you.
Yes, yes, you shook me all night long
Of course my response to you came after your original post. Kinda obvious. That is what a response is, right? Anyway I totally get you believe music is binary: Beats 1 or American Standards. I think that is wrong thinking and factually incorrect too but you are allowed your beliefs, true enough.
Nice try, I never made that claim. Seems to be just more projection and defensiveness on your part.
"Of course my response to you came after your original post. Kinda obvious."
Apparently not so obvious. Your post, a few minutes after my original post, was not in response to what I wrote.
I asked myself the same, then I investigated, and now I'm puzzled as to how this could be number one of anything.I'm obviously too old for this stuff, because the first thing I asked is "who the heck is Drake?"...![]()
Sigh. Couldn't even go one comment before someone started flogging this dead horse.
1. If you didn't mean for your post to suggest a binary choice then please explain what you meant when you post that the people complaining about Beats 1 music programming want Kate Smith. You have yet to do that in any of our back and forth -- only telling me that isn't what you meant. OK, so what did you mean?
2. Confused about the second part of this. Are you referring to my direct response to your post or my response made to a different poster? My response to you is my response to you. My response to the other poster was to him or her, not directed to you at all, hence I quoted him in that post, not you.
"(although Apple declined to offer specific listener numbers)."
And that's the most important bit of all. Its good people streamed the same millions of time. but that doesn't mean anything.
I can listen to the same song a million times on Apple music, that doesn't necessarily mean it's popular.
No, we shall not. This site came up with this name when Apple hardly made anything except macs. It is almost 2 decades later now and Mac is not any more the main focus for Apple. This site isn't gonna change it's name just because some mac obsessed guys want exclusivity.
Apple thinks we are all 16-21 year olds who wear hoodies and spend all day in Starbucks and on Snapchat. That's why we don't need new Macs, apparently.