Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Kate Smith was a random choice to illustrate people have different tastes. I listen to Beats 1 to be exposed to, discover, and listen to new music.

Sorry you're confused.

Right, but the tone of your post was pejorative rather than embracing other people's musical tastes not included on Beats 1. Anyway, this horse is beaten to death so I'm going to stop kicking it.
 
Right, but the tone of your post was pejorative rather than embracing other people's musical tastes not included on Beats 1. Anyway, this horse is beaten to death so I'm going to stop kicking it.

I think what people don't understand, is that Apple offers a lot of "radio stations" hitting different music genres, with Beats 1 addressing just one (and it's not really a single "one"), and no doubt curated to hit Apple's largest listening demographic. There are also "stations" for a lot of everything else from jazz to house.

If I want to listen to old Paul Butterfield, Psychonauts, Miles Davis, or Sneaker Pimps, Beats 1 is not the right "station."
 
Last edited:
Nice photographic skills ;)

drake-boat.jpg
Good one.

I am photographer as well so you hit the point with an image and the suggestion that although old... still cool :))
I will take this as a compliment and a pat on the shoulder :-D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jsameds
I love Apple Music.
I love Beats 1.
I love Drake.

But, to be fair, I'm also the target audience: Millennial, university grad, own my own business, diverse, inclusive, multi-cultural, open to new and different things.

Anyway, most of you aren't the target demo, so it makes sense that ya'll don't know who Drake is or think Beats 1 is rubbish.

That's the beauty of it all. There's plenty available on Apple Music for you guys to listen to as well :)


Dude, you like Drake and chose Apple Music at some point. "Owning" a "production company" and being "multi-cultural" has nothing to do with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jjhny
Three steps for Apple music to be perfect:

- Make the algorithms for music discoverability not favor popular musicians. Allow people who like mainstream music to listen to it, but do not force it on the throats of the people who don't.
- Increase diversity in Beats radio stations.
- Allow users to share their playlists. Human curation at its best.

Regarding genres:

- For god's sake. Jazz is a genre. I don't get why Jazz is not available in the Genres tab. That's downright insulting.
- Finally, do not dump every music in Alternative. You seem to use it as an umbrella term for almost every music that does not quite fit in its "genre core".

Claps, a constructive comment. Hope it reaches the destination.
 
Honestly, and maybe it's just my generation, but we really enjoyed radio in the '50s and '60s. And into the '70s. Sure, the '50s was all payola, but it was great to listen to at 14. The '60s brought the big radio personalities, and the music got bigger too. My big event was the first time I heard "Like a Rolling Stone" on AM radio, all 6 minutes. In the '70s, the great FM radio was fantastic... until the labels were bought out by huge corporations and the stations started all playing off the same master list. I had a friend in radio at that point, and his whole apartment filled up with thousands of promotional albums. He was encyclopedic, and he had taste. All my tips about new artists came from him. Now, if we had radio that did that? I think that's worthwhile, but maybe youngers would rather have algorithms and/or the crowd take that function over. I think you can't beat a really informed music fan saying, "Hey, there's this new group, and they're fantastic!"
[doublepost=1490651574][/doublepost]
Claps, a constructive comment. Hope it reaches the destination.
I'd rather there be lots more than one station. Nothing beats a human picking and choosing. Even if you disagree with them once in a while.
 
Honestly, and maybe it's just my generation, but we really enjoyed radio in the '50s and '60s. And into the '70s. Sure, the '50s was all payola, but it was great to listen to at 14. The '60s brought the big radio personalities, and the music got bigger too. My big event was the first time I heard "Like a Rolling Stone" on AM radio, all 6 minutes. In the '70s, the great FM radio was fantastic... until the labels were bought out by huge corporations and the stations started all playing off the same master list. I had a friend in radio at that point, and his whole apartment filled up with thousands of promotional albums. He was encyclopedic, and he had taste. All my tips about new artists came from him. Now, if we had radio that did that? I think that's worthwhile, but maybe youngers would rather have algorithms and/or the crowd take that function over. I think you can't beat a really informed music fan saying, "Hey, there's this new group, and they're fantastic!"
[doublepost=1490651574][/doublepost]
I'd rather there be lots more than one station. Nothing beats a human picking and choosing. Even if you disagree with them once in a while.
There's still people like that in radio. There's not as many, but they're there. Locally there's a few of them, who are given a few hours a week on their respective stations to play what they want, outside of the regular playlists.

Now, that's what Beats 1 is supposed to do. They play their share of mainstream hits to keep listeners tuned in, but all the hosts are super-knowledgeable and throw in completely new music just like you said.

The problem you get in the MacRumors comments is that 95% of the people here are outside of their target audience, and can't see past their own noses. They think that they should be the target market for anything Apple produces, and can't understand why Apple would operate a station like this.
 
I'm sure you can find something online that plays that. My wife has no problem finding it when she wants to hear it. Expecting a music service like Beats 1 that's all about discovering new music to play it... well, that's asking a bit much.
I have already given up.
Even Pandora can't do that now.
My CD collections will have to do that job.
 
Given it's not broadcast over Radio, nice spin apple. Given its preinstalled on every idevice, it's not hard for them to become the "biggest"

It's when I told my mates, I could take over coaching the All Blacks next week, they will win, does that make me a great coach ....Nope.
You mean free radio doesn't have advantages of its own.
[doublepost=1490686678][/doublepost]
Don't call Mac a dead horse.
a dead truck?
 
But how exact and deep is it? Last time I tried to find any punk bands on Apple Music it was interesting to say the least

On the iPhone app, I go to radio, scroll down, then under all genres, I see a Jazz listing.

In iTunes, I go to Radio, on the right are drop downs that say Music and all genres. I click all genres, and see an option for jazz.
 

The story has the headline:

"Apple May Launch Additional Beats Streaming Radio Station"

But reading it there isn't anything from anyone at Apple saying they are going to do that. In which case its a little disingenuous to have a go at them for not having done so yet.
[doublepost=1490970972][/doublepost]
I apologize for any ambiguity! I also think Taylor is talented & her music "fun"; to be clear- I was NOT calling for a boycott of Swift, merely commenting that diversity is withering w/ "sounds like" artists and bands dominating the airwaves.
I was saying that Drake/Swift ARE radio right now. Though they may be individually awesome, this does not make for radio that I'm interested in; as I said- it feels "whitewashed" to me.

Fair enough - although I'd say that I wouldn't describe Beats 1 as whitewashed - there is a huge amount of diversity on there. If people don't like rap (heck, I'm not really into rap), then don't listen to the shows that are more rap orientated. Works for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tycho24
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.