I've been reading your comments on the thread and I agree with you too. People can be overly sensitive sometimes.
Hey, thanks buddy!
I've been reading your comments on the thread and I agree with you too. People can be overly sensitive sometimes.
Beats is often criticized as being a bass-heavy fashion accessory and not a true audiophile product
Right, the bass heavy posse wear their hats sideways, their pants hang halfway down their arse, and anytime they speak they precede what they say with "yo yo". They also have $8,000 worth of subwoofers installed in a car that's worth about $1500 bucks.
They aren't obnoxious though.... Not at all.![]()
Right, the bass heavy posse wear their hats sideways, their pants hang halfway down their arse, and anytime they speak they precede what they say with "yo yo". They also have $8,000 worth of subwoofers installed in a car that's worth about $1500 bucks.
They aren't obnoxious though.... Not at all.![]()
In my experience the only people that like Beats headphones are people who have no idea what good sound quality is, or think a lot of base equals good quality, and let's not forget the ones that buy Beats solely because they make them look "cool".
Personally, like someone else mentioned in the thread, I think they make people look like douches.
Must have been high-school students!
Seems like a good deal for Apple. More money from "douches", more money for R&D. More money for R&D, more cool features introduced at WWDC hidden inside their software for hi-end audio developers to use.
so called audiophiles are the most annoying,obnoxious people on this site.
Here's a fact:some people WANT a lot of bass.So go listen to your senneshers or whatever it's called.No one cares.
There is a percentage of the population that wants to look like douches (to you). There is a good percentage of the population who like music, but don't care about "good sound quality" (yet?). Some of this population has money and spends it. Apple would prefer that they spend this money on Apple (or their Beats subsidiary) products, and not on the competition's stuff.
As for the relative size of this population (and how much money they spend), try comparing Beats hardware revenue with one of the boutique audiophile companies.
Seems like a good deal for Apple. More money from "douches", more money for R&D. More money for R&D, more cool features introduced at WWDC hidden inside their software for hi-end audio developers to use.
Many so called Audiophiles are pretty ignorant to real sound quality in a blind test. Been proven time and time again.
Me, I like my earpods just fine. Cant see paying more for any brand of headphone, owned by Apple or not.
Beats can be compared to Samsung, crazy marketing to drive sales, but lower quality products compared to the competition.
You cannot compare Samsung to Beats. Samsung does massive R&D.
I'm pretty sure R&D isn't the same as Marketing. I was comparing them in regards to their Marketing.
Uh, I'm about as loyal an Apple person you'll find. I have never spent money on a computer other than an Apple. Once the iPod and iPhone were released, I have only ever owned those types of products. I was a stockholder at one time and I was an employee for seven years.
I also happen to believe that the hiring of Andre Young is an insult to every female, gay and lesbian employee of the company. As long as Dr. Dre is drawing an Apple paycheck, I cannot in good conscience give them so much as a penny of my money.
My ears are gently messaged by the HD 650 Pro![]()
I don't feel like a celebrity follower if I buy Samsung.
I'm thinking about buying these
http://www.amazon.com/Audio-Technica-ATH-M50x-Professional-Headphones/dp/B00HVLUR86/ref=dp_ob_title_ce
There is a percentage of the population that wants to look like douches (to you). There is a good percentage of the population who like music, but don't care about "good sound quality" (yet?). Some of this population has money and spends it. Apple would prefer that they spend this money on Apple (or their Beats subsidiary) products, and not on the competition's stuff.
As for the relative size of this population (and how much money they spend), try comparing Beats hardware revenue with one of the boutique audiophile companies.
Seems like a good deal for Apple. More money from "douches", more money for R&D. More money for R&D, more cool features introduced at WWDC hidden inside their software for hi-end audio developers to use.
Right, the bass heavy posse wear their hats sideways, their pants hang halfway down their arse, and anytime they speak they precede what they say with "yo yo". They also have $8,000 worth of subwoofers installed in a car that's worth about $1500 bucks.
They aren't obnoxious though.... Not at all.![]()
You think any and all companies dont? lol.
Just because they don't verbally say it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist, thus the overseas jobs, poor work conditions for the overseas jobs, not bringing jobs to america, outsourcing to make bigger margins, laying employees off, sweatshops, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.
GET REAL PEOPLE. HATE is everywhere and more people have died in the name of "God" than any of these hate crimes. UGH. PEOPLE.
If you don't like someones opinion, don't listen to them.
If you don't like a picture, don't look at it.
If you don't want to buy something, then don't.
If you don't want to befriend someone, don't.
ITS SIMPLE.
I don't like the Dallas Coybows, so I don't watch their games.
I don't like the LA Lakers, so I don't watch their games.
I don't like Lil' Wayne, so I don't listen to his music.
I don't like the movie The Hunger games, so I don't watch it.
I don't like celeb gossip magazines, do I don't buy or read them.
ITS SIMPLE
typically younger consumers who buy Beats are more interested in appearance than audio quality.