Ordered one today. Let's just say I did not pay 130
As far as nightstand mode r u kidding me that has to be the dumbest feature. It's not on all the time so what's the point. Use my cable box for that. Alarm is on my iPhone - has been.
The way I see it 20 for a lightning cable 30 more for another watch charging cable ...... Paid another 20 and I'm done.
I was wondering the same thing. Do I love the way my phone looks without a case, sure. With 3 kids, and life's inevitable drops and fumbles, I need a case. All these docks forget that most people are probably using a case of some kind, even if it isn't a bulky Otterbox.But, will it blend?
WAIT!!!
What about Otterbox devotees? Will someone need to come up with a lightening extension just to get these charging bases to work with the Otterbox? I'm getting sick of that.
Some people believe that nobody in the world has a right to have a different opinion. "If I don't need it then clearly nobody else does, so the product shouldn't exist and nobody should be discussing it."That's nice, but I can't help but ask why you would post this info. This thread is about new stand. Your comment really has absolutely nothing to do with this stand. Why post it?Since I wear my watch when I sleep I don't need a stand and don't care about nightstand mode.
Well, keep in mind that it includes a Watch charger, which is $40 sold separately. All of the other Watch stands I've seen require you to attach an Apple charger (sold separately). So you could make the argument that its price is comparable to a $90 stand from another manufacturer.I was just about to say that looks like something Apple would design for their stores to display both the phones and watches together (which I don't think they do). It looks pretty cool, but not $130 cool.
Are you aware of the fact that Apple didn't design, manufacture or sell this product?Wow. Apple getting out of hand, thinking we will buy just about anything if it has the word "Apple" on it. Note to Apple, some of us are smarter than this, and still look at what value it adds, and I do not see an added value of $130. Ouch.
What is your system? I current use a projection alarm clock but only has a static brightness setting. One that adapts to the ambient light level would be great!A nightstand clock should tell time, all the time. It should dim at night and be brighter in the day. One should not have to touch anything to find out what time it is.
That's the way my system works. The user sets the dim level, which kicks in at night and turns off in the morning.
If the watch screen is subject to burn in, that makes it unsuitable for any continual clock display.
What is your system? I current use a projection alarm clock but only has a static brightness setting. One that adapts to the ambient light level would be great!
Check your messages.What is your system? I current use a projection alarm clock but only has a static brightness setting. One that adapts to the ambient light level would be great!