Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hmmm. I might buy an iPad 3 after all. It's just that, I know for a fact that the 4th generation will be considerably different.
 
great i just spent $500 on the exact same iPad i already have. man apple is starting to suck with these incremental updates!

Its easy to get away with on computers, but on disposable mobile Tech, you really need to beat yourself when releasing something new!

This is why it makes more sense to buy every second or third generation, that way you'll appreciate the upgrade more.
 
great i just spent $500 on the exact same iPad i already have. man apple is starting to suck with these incremental updates!

Its easy to get away with on computers, but on disposable mobile Tech, you really need to beat yourself when releasing something new!

You have noticed the screen right? And the camera, the LTE, etc etc
 
Yes, Geekbench is a really poor indicator for performance, not just for iPad, but also for desktop computers. It's rare that people use computers in the ways Geekbench test them for. Sure, if you render 3D graphics or solve a matrix with multiple unknown variables, but not if you browse the web, watch YouTube, and play games. It's among the most synthetic of synthetic tests.
 
great i just spent $500 on the exact same iPad i already have. man apple is starting to suck with these incremental updates!

Its easy to get away with on computers, but on disposable mobile Tech, you really need to beat yourself when releasing something new!

Lordy. I think John Gruber summed this up best:

Daring Fireball said:
But if a faster processor, more RAM, a double-the-resolution retina display, a better camera, and maybe even LTE networking make for a “modest” update, then what would it take for the iPad 3 to be deemed an immodest update? A fusion energy source? Teleportation? A camera that sees into the future?
 
Who cares about the geekbench scores?
Does scrolling lag? No
Is it slow? No
Is it powerful enough to run the display? Yes
Does it run graphic intensive games well? Yes

To all you people who say "I won't buy it until its quad core" ect ect, I feel sorry for you!

Because without benchmarks the fandroids, have nothing to think their crap is better.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9B176 Safari/7534.48.3)

If you don't care about retina display, LTE, and the improved camera, this news is great. You can get a refurbished iPad 2 for $349 and have the same CPU as the new iPad.
 
They improved exactly what needed improving. Nothing wrong or slow with the processing. But the graphics had to be upgraded.

Apple understands that balance well. Exactly what you need in power to guarantee a smooth snappy and responsive user experience, but no more power than needed to preserve the battery life - one of THE most raved about features of the iPad.

I am not doing simulations of Nuclear weapons degradation for the Pentagon with this thing.
 
great i just spent $500 on the exact same iPad i already have. man apple is starting to suck with these incremental updates!

Its easy to get away with on computers, but on disposable mobile Tech, you really need to beat yourself when releasing something new!

I'm sorry but I really don't understand this view at all. Yes, the CPU seems to be the same but:

a) The screen, GPU, RAM, camera and battery have ALL been upgraded, in the case of the screen and GPU to top of the range components (and the battery looks like it'd fall into the same category). As far as the end user experience is concerned that's a massive update not an incremental one.

b) It's not as if anyone is crying out for an improved CPU anyway. GPU yes, gotta feed that Retina display, CPU though, no. The iPad 2 is more than fast enough already, an incremental boost in speed probably wouldn't make much of a visible difference anyway. The only real way to give a significant increase is either increase the number of cores (battery issues, heat issues, the OS and apps have to make good use of more cores) or to shift to a new version of the CPU (ARM15, not yet ready).

Yet people get hung up on a single figure and that's that... I really don't understand some tech geeks anymore. :(
 

Interesting. Compared to iPad 2:

1. Performance writing to an offscreen bitmap is very substantially higher (more than 60 percent).

2. Performance writing to the screen cannot be judged, because they both run the benchmark at exactly 60 frames per second.

3. Total benchmark time cannot be judged either, because the time writing to the screen is identical.
 
Lucky you guys.
70% of "the New iPad" "upgraders" just just got a very crisp screen to play Infinity Blade on. Only a small % of the remaining 30% actually got something useful for their professional life.
 
Interesting. Compared to iPad 2:

1. Performance writing to an offscreen bitmap is very substantially higher (more than 60 percent).

2. Performance writing to the screen cannot be judged, because they both run the benchmark at exactly 60 frames per second.

3. Total benchmark time cannot be judged either, because the time writing to the screen is identical.
Indeed, some nice results...
Wow it's quite a bit faster on the GPU side.
Oh yea a! :D
 
I remember when the iPad 2 came out, and how many people said they wouldn't upgrade unless it had the Retina display. Now it has the Retina display and they won't upgrade till it has a Quad-core.

Whatever.
 
i was just joking really... Apple could have simply changed the shape of the home button and that would have been enough for me.

I just hope they never release an iTurd, because i will really be wasting my money LOL
 
The important thing is if the GPU and RAM increases are enough to offset the Retina display to keep the new iPad as responsive as the iPad 2. We'll see on Friday.
 
great i just spent $500 on the exact same iPad i already have. man apple is starting to suck with these incremental updates!

Its easy to get away with on computers, but on disposable mobile Tech, you really need to beat yourself when releasing something new!

Lol how do you figure it's the same? Because it's still 1ghz? really that's all that's the same. Some people are never satisfied.
 
Get new one?

I always get the new iPads & iPhones even if it's called just" incremental update" it always seems to be more then people think. I love the excitement and anticapation of it all, childish it may be but it keeps me young and looking forward to something new! Even all these blogs are fun to read during a new release. I got my pre-order in and it will be here Friday morning! But I will also go wait in line with my buddy and we will get a couple more for family and for the fun waiting in line, always meet some cool people and just have a good time being a bunch of geeks:cool:
:apple::apple::apple:
 
Thanks, but I'm still waiting for iFixit and Anand to get ahold of one.

Looking good though!

Retina display is obviously good.

Ram? Check.
Camera? Waiting.
Battery still "full day"? Waiting.
Overall performance? Waiting.
 
i guess keeping the processor the same as the ipad 2 offset the (potentially) higher cost of the retina display...
The processor isn't the same...

----------

Lucky you guys.
70% of "the New iPad" "upgraders" just just got a very crisp screen to play Infinity Blade on. Only a small % of the remaining 30% actually got something useful for their professional life.
The 70% that just got a very crisp screen for "Infinity Blade" usually has a better job than someone who uses the iPad FOR there job.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.