ingenious
macrumors 68000
yahtzeen said:Couldn't wireless Firewire possibly handle some of these wishlist items?
No. It would give us all cancer.
yahtzeen said:Couldn't wireless Firewire possibly handle some of these wishlist items?
whfsdude said:it could be the next gen ipod..
Airport card in the ipod. Steaming to it, streaming from it. Control your airport express. 😀
It would be silly to have another device. People don't want to carry a 100 things in their pocket
petej said:Maybe I missed this in another thread but I haven't seen any discussion of the uses for the USB port on the airport express. Everyone seems to have just accepted Apple's explanation of this as a printer port. I just wanted to throw in the fact that despite USB's limited bandwidth, at 11Mbps it is actually capably of transporting broadcast quality MPEG2 program streams - just. Translate this to MPEG4 to give yourself a bit more room on the bandwidth, add a USB powered MPEG4 decoder cable and hey presto, you have an airport express with the potential to stream your video to TV.
cr2sh said:You may get rid of the wired transfer.. but there's no way you're getting rid of the power source.
BeyondCloister said:WWDC is a developer event so I would expect it would be stuff relevant to development.
a_iver said:Wait.. I thought they had people working on wireless electricity transfers. I think the correct wording would be "there's nothing available right now for a wireless power transfer." That is unless Apple invents an Armitron-type iPod; the kind that mechanically add power as you walk. That would be cool.
joeboy_45101 said:Does anybody know if Apple streams the WWDC Keynote in the AppleStores. I'd like to stop in and see it if they do. 😕
Awimoway said:Announced the same day as AirTunes (and maybe that's Snell's excusehe missed it in all the other news), I give you the Sonos system.
Awimoway said:Announced the same day as AirTunes (and maybe that's Snell's excusehe missed it in all the other news), I give you the Sonos system.
pjkelnhofer said:I honestly don't really like the idea of a single WiFi remote for the system. I can't keep track of my TV remote half the time.
NeoMayhem said:Wireless power is possible, and it already in use today.
Ever heard of solar panels? They receive energy wirelessly.
mainstreetmark said:Obviously we mean wirelessly transmit power.
mainstreetmark said:Obviously we mean wirelessly transmit power. The only reasonable thing todate is those stupid keychains they used to have a Mobile stations where you walk up, and swipe it. In that time, the keychain charges up from the power in the carrier signal and broadcasts it's ID back to the gas pump, and poof, it's out of power. We're talking milliwatts and millimeters.
Tesla, as mentioned earlier, once had a pretty good plan to build a tower that created an ionized tunnel between the earth (ground) and some layer in the upper atmosphere, which, in theory, would allow a power company to 'charge up' and people all over to place a small antenna on their house, and another one stuck in the ground, and receive power, but that experiment ran out of money before the prototype could be completed. Then Tesla went nuts and started taking care of all the pigeons in NYC.
Also, I kind of think that something with the transmitting power and bandwitdh of 802.11g would consume quite a bit of juice from something like an iPod. With a PowerBook, it's not such a big deal, since there's plenty of high-capacity battery, but the iPod's just got that little guy in there, and it's already got to run the harddrive, and the iPod is already on the low end of battery life. Wifi may be an overkill. Bluetooth (purely due to range) may be an underkill. A separate RF receiver would work well, but would require a dongle plugged into the computer, which I would dislike. It's like when I bought my first wireless mouse and it came with a mouse-looking thing I still had to plug in to the USB port. (Then I got the MX900)
That would be cool.MentalFabric said:I hold to my belief that the portable displays have some connections with AE.
Can't use Bluetooth for headphones without a decompression engine built in-- BT only has 768kbits bandwidth.CoreForce said:What can enhance the iPod the most? Bluetooth.
It will offer wire-free headphones, supercool.
ccuilla said:Possibly, but there would be a couple of other things going on...2-way...the remote knows what's playing from iTunes on your Mac as well as control. Secondly, it could be that doing WiFi is not terribly more complex, costly or power hungry than Bluetooth. So maybe use it instead. But BT would be fine. In the end I don't think I care. It is wireless (RF not IR)...it has a display and scroll wheel like the iPod. It costs about $50.