https://timothybuck.me/blog/why-apple-wont-do-what-marco-wants-to-fix-the-macbook-pro
Good read explaining why Apple won’t walk back on their MacBook design decisions anytime soon.
A pretty good post, but he somewhat misses the mark when talking about USB-C. Calling them USB-C ports is really not sufficient, since the 2016/2017 MBP are capable of running the Thunderbolt 3 protocol over that USB-C port. It’s much more accurate to call it a Thunderbolt 3 Port. (Think of USB-C as being the physical connector.)
On the 15” MBP, each of the four TB3 ports are capable of 40Gbps of full duplex (bi-directional) bandwidth, i.e. 40 Gpbs in and out of the port simultaneously. TB3 ports are extremely versatile, and besides charging the MBP battery, they also provide support for any of the following (though not simultaneously):
- 4 lanes of PCI Express 3.0 (32 Gbps) for an eGPU or any supported PCIe card via an enclosure
- 8 lanes of DisplayPort 1.2, which can support either a 5K monitor @ 60Hz, a 4K monitor @ 120Hz, or 2 x 4K monitors at 60 Hz
- USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) including backward compatibility to all previous USB protocols, all the back to USB 1.1
- Other connection types, such as HDMI natively via an “alternate” mode (there are other alt modes) and 10 Gb emulated Ethernet, peer-to-peer
- Backwards compatibility with Thunderbolt 1 and 2 devices
In contrast, the 12” MacBook also has a (single) USB-C port, but it’s not a TB3 port. It’s a USB 3.1 Gen 1 port, which is limited to 5 Gbps, full duplex.
Confusion over USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 port/protocol/connector naming issues are exacerbated by the wide variety of cables available, some of which will limit the speed of the link or the ability to deliver power. It’s really kind of a mess and you have to be careful when buying cables to make sure you’re getting what you need.
[doublepost=1511740219][/doublepost]
You know, I'd be willing to bet that the percentage of users who "need" a TB3 port is miniscule . . . and you know it's true too.
The most common use case would probably be for a 5K monitor (or two), which isn’t compatible with the TB2 port on previous generation MBP.
And you might be surprised at the number of different vertical uses for a TB3-connected external PCI-e chassis: an nVidia card (CUDA for GPGPU or even gaming), some proprietary video accelerator or DAW card, etc.
But in any case, stop acting like I somehow implied a greater need for Thunderbolt 3 than I did. I said “some” users. Whether that’s 1%, 5%, 10% or more is unknown but it doesn’t matter. The users are there, and it’s a growing percentage.
It really gets old when people only take into account their own personal experience or use case and project it onto the universe of users. Your anecdotal observations are not data. Feel free to use whatever fits your requirements, but you not having something or not needing it isn’t relevant to those who do, and you know it.