Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Are you sure that it's not enough? Seriously?

Let's wait until March 28th after earnings call ... I don't foresee sales of the Z10 to show an increase in revenue significantly as the roll-out is a bit slow - recall their largest OEM stopped making devices for them back in January this year (announcement was made in summer 2012).

I expect the next quarter to show significant revenues. I still believe their machine to machine business is a sleeping giant currently; which is based on the company they now own QNX, the real-time OS, and their infrastructure NOC which is tied into over 208 providers (think Nortel in early 80's).

If one understands their NOC and how it hooks into providers GGSN's, and creates APN's on a top level you'll understand what the QNX team is doing with car manufacturers beyond what we see.
Porsche
Audi (MMI)
Cadillac's On-Star (this is a GOOD representation of where their going yet without a person assisting you). BTW, On-Star uses QNX from top to bottom to get sensor readout, car positioning, audio relay ... all this beyond the user UI for music, GPS, and car controls (like windshield wiper, turn indicator, engine knock sensors to communicate, oil-pressure sensors, etc etc).



True they ARE ripe for takeover ... so many analysts have been preaching and predicting this the past two years yet NOBODY is biting yet. Why? Because they want the leg work to be completed before purchasing - you don't buy a half working car if you're going to spend a fortune to fix it up and get it rolling, do you? Lenovo's CEO seem to be flip flopping on statements like he's pumping and dumping the stock!!

This is what I mean by Machine to Machine business ...

source: http://seriousmobile.wordpress.com/2013/01/06/rim-bb10-true-end-game-is-qnx-noc/

(NOTE: this is my blog and I've done a fair bit of research far and beyond what I'm seeing so called analysts focus on with respect to BlackBerry; something I find appalling).

You're doing a fine job advocating for the "Homeland." I just don't see it developing. But hey, it's just my opinion. ;)
 
There is a novelty in having the most features and the best spec's. But in the end, I believe that simple, elegant design wins. And sometimes you can measure the quality of something not just by what it has but also by what it doesn't.

Bravo! Well said.

If I may add 'sometimes you can measure the quality of something not just by what it has but also by how it is used'. This is the formula for BB10 ... the Z10 looks lackluster in terms of phsycial design compared to the competition. Honestly. However when you begin to use it, even past 3 days you begin to realize its what's underneath the "skin" that matters - similar to how we should see a person .. under the "skin" is what matters who they are, how they act. The mobile OS what it is and how it acts, what it offers, how does it get things done? how does it make your actions/tasks easier than the competition.

Features are great ... but useless if you have to fight to get to use them or too many steps to use them. Worse if they really don't offer you a significant value. Samsungs' "S" this and that is more of branding what the core JB offers on quite a few levels; a few things are new but. The scrolling while reading feature ... doesn't JB already have this on the Galaxy Nexus? I could've sworn this was there.
 
Blackberry > Google Nexus > iPhone

I will tell you this. I have owned an iPhone (4s) and the Google Nexus and I got my Blackberry z10 on Friday and I have to say it's the best phone I've ever owned. Granted Im a business user so Im not all that interested in AngryBirds (though they have that) but for productivity - it kills the Nexus (Android) and the iPhone (iOS).
 
Hahaha look who's talking. Apple's innovation is so far ahead that it practically set every one of these tech companies for life. How can you call a company that literally started this entire new industry with its innovative products (iPhone/iPad/iOS), to lack innovation? A matter of fact.
 
You really need to define your "current era of smartphones" statement to be clear.

Touchscreen?
- Been done by about 10 different PocketPC-PE, Symbian devices before iPhone.
Multi-Touch?
- If I recall there was at least 1 smartphone on the market available (yes even in the US) that was capable of this. Didn't sell at all well but it had it: Nokia 7710. I think there was another though. Missy Elliot featured this in one of her videos long ago. Motorola's Accompli line evolved using Linux OS but I cannot recall the exact model that had multi-touch so I maybe mistaken here. The level of 5 fingers multi-touch yes Apple brought that to market but its NOT an Apple innovation another company made this and was selling it to any buyers willing.
App Store?
- BINGO pure Apple innovation! Bar none. Completely agree. This maybe something that was bound to happen yet VERY difficult for Symbian to accomplish and other mobile OS' since the vast sparse availability to source and install applications was never governed. The Google PlayStore seems to have surpassed this by re-installing apps when you sign into another device, and push app installs done by any web-browser, something I'm greateful that BB10 offers.
1-button on the face of a smartphone
- Apple wins here again.
Glass for the screen
- Apple is NOT the first here.
Touch Sensors imbedded into the Glass (no separation of substrate)
- Apple is NOT the first here. Compaq did this some 4yrs earlier. Heck even the Palm Treo 600 had this.

So again I implore you to define what you mean by "ushered in the current era of smart phones with the iPhone." ;)

PS: I'm well aware of the Android being originally designed to compete with BB; that was not part of our rebuttal ;) To be honest I think the evil emporer (Google Chairman) still uses a BB, no? ;)

It's a oft-repeated argument to separate out individual features and dismiss them as having been done before. You can do this with any product if you break it into small enough parts. :)

The iPhone was the first smartphone focused around a capacitive multitouch screen combined with a modern OS featuring a desktop class browser. Like the current era of smartphones.

(Nokia 7710 was not multitouch.)
 
You're doing a fine job advocating for the "Homeland." I just don't see it developing. But hey, it's just my opinion. ;)

Touché (if I'm using that correctly). We're always entitled to our own opinions i'm all for being shown when I'm wrong as well and thanks for highlighting my allegiance ;)

BlackBerry has definitely a very steep uphill battle but anyone could commend them after so long finally getting things done - admist failed promises and missed deliveries over a 2.5yr time frame - while doing so without any bank loans of credit and without being in the red all along.

Then I must be using BB10 because he configurado English, castellano y català in my SwiftKey app i puc canviar entre ellos sense haver de switch the language


Ups, no, I'm using Android 4.2.2 in a Nexus 7

in bold is a fail!
- also seems you're using 2 languages there not three? I'm only learning my second language and I see Espanol there yet the context is off. Ellos and haver are not in the right context are they? Hmm.

Recall I stated three languages and not have to switch between the two - show me a screenshot where your keyboard of choice specifically offers this and NOT via manually typing; as I'm very curious if this is a new development for Android.
 
Change for the sake of change is not a good thing. It's no accident that every operating system (other than Windows phone) is imitating the grid layout and other simple design elements and user interfaces in iOS.

I think it's particularly unhelpful to say something could be better without stating exactly what you dislike about it and how you'd improve it. I, for one, would like a more transparent file system and better nesting of folders. But a major redesign to the look and feel of iOS? Why?
 
Touché (if I'm using that correctly). We're always entitled to our own opinions i'm all for being shown when I'm wrong as well and thanks for highlighting my allegiance ;)

BlackBerry has definitely a very steep uphill battle but anyone could commend them after so long finally getting things done - admist failed promises and missed deliveries over a 2.5yr time frame - while doing so without any bank loans of credit and without being in the red all along.



in bold is a fail!
- also seems you're using 2 languages there not three? I'm only learning my second language and I see Espanol there yet the context is off. Ellos and haver are not in the right context are they? Hmm.

Recall I stated three languages and not have to switch between the two - show me a screenshot where your keyboard of choice specifically offers this and NOT via manually typing; as I'm very curious if this is a new development for Android.

There are three languages: English, Spanish and Catalan.

I puc canviar (catalan) = and I can change
Sense haver de (catalan) = without having to
 
I maybe late in this thread to reply to the first page ... but here goes.

dude you're a BAFOON!

1. NOC!! Data compression outside of a providers GGSN!
2. Real Time push email innovation - NO OTHER manufacturer or provider got this done back in 1996! Right now with data consumption for smartphones iOS and Android to a large corporation this is even MORE relevant now than anything else! (I've seen iOS IP5 or iPad 3 consume 500MB+ of roaming data - Canadian provider to France & Italy 1wk each and cause $6000!)

3. physical keyboard rivals even those on desktop workstations.
4. Machine to Machine business:
Right now you have no idea of RIM's true end-game.

5. QNX innovated for real-time OS;
cars, USA Military drones, etc.

Do some solid research as to not put a foot in your mouth.

Yes you are very late.

----------

Really? Wow you couldn't broadcast anymore loudly that you're a fool. Have you no clue about history?

No clue at all! I must be so stupid.

Just love all of the redundant attacks on my post. It's amazing.
 
There are three languages: English, Spanish and Catalan.

I puc canviar (catalan) = and I can change
Sense haver de (catalan) = without having to

Then this means it doesn't do what BB10 currently does. Set languages 1 time and then type as you go with 3 languages; interchanging between the 3 with spell check or without in proper context to each language as you go.

Stating that you need to change, if I'm reading that correctly, means on Android you cannot do what is currently capable on BB10.
 
If anyone would have first hand knowledge of losing market leadership because of a lack of (or even perceived lack of) innovation it would be a Blackberry executive.

This stuff doesn't happen overnight though. It took RIM 2 years to re-brand themselves and bring BB10 to market. We're only a few months into the executive shake up at Apple, so I don't know how much change we can really expect to see in iOS 7.

QFT. I don't understand why people are expecting a redesigned OS, courtesy of Jony, only months after his involvement. Surely any such change would have already been in the works.
 
Yup and if you look at the iPhone 5 years ago, and look at it now, its hardly changed. Sure, its had a very minute UI tweak, and the hardware has changed, but no killer features have actually been added to the OS.

Several variations of this have been posted. It's ludicrous. iOS is one of the fastest evolving, and innovating, OSes I've ever seen. Every year significant features are added and apparently they are so seamless that people don't even notice even as they use them constantly. OSes usually take years between significant releases. Admittedly, most of these innovations are in the platform, not in the app launcher interface.

Yes, the most visible feature of the interface is pretty much the same (icons on a grid with multiple screens) but that doesn't have to change for innovation to happen. The mouse / icon /window interface is 30 years old and you could argue that it hasn't really changed much in that time.

For the non-developers out there who don't see the massive innovation going on, a quick way to gauge is to look at how quickly and how widely applications shift to requiring a new OS version. Developers don't do that just because, they do that because the new OS has compelling features that they want to take advantage of.
 
You are right. Apple was not the first to introduce a product that was categorized as a "smartphone". This is the graphic Apple used during the release of the 1st gen iPhone:
Image

I had a Palm Treo "smartphone". It had email capabilities and presumably web browsing capabilities. Saying that I could reliably get email would already be a stretch. Also, reading those emails was, well, a challenge. With regards to browsing the interwebs... there were maybe 2 websites that I could load.

Let's face it, while there were "smartphones" back in the day, they were far from smart. Let's take the iPhone out of the equation. If the android phones came out first, the android phones would have been the revolutionary product that would have brought legitimacy to "smartphones". Everything before it was just lacking.

You're right. I don't think anyone is discounting the impact of the iPhone back in 2007. My comment was strictly those mocking RIM about no innovation (and they stand by their comment firmly) and only Apple was the only one who innovated to create the smartphone. To them, they don't see that without Palm OS, BBOS and everything they brought to sector, there might not even be iPhone or an iPhone that was that revolutionary.
 
Then this means it doesn't do what BB10 currently does. Set languages 1 time and then type as you go with 3 languages; interchanging between the 3 with spell check or without in proper context to each language as you go

Second time, that is what SwiftKey 4 does
 
Apple are very aware of the competition... they didn't introduce a larger screen sized iPhone 5 for sake of it, they did it because of the competition / consumer like larger displays.
Too little, too late
 
Second time, that is what SwiftKey 4 does

3rd time, you've yet to prove that SwiftKey 4 does what BB10 can do. What did you mean by "I puc canviar (catalan) = and I can change" ... meaning you can change that particular language setting itself or that the spelling you can change after a typo I highlighted from you post on the previous page? Please clarify as I've not used swiftkey 3/4. You're rebuttal is lost on me so try to be clear politely as I'm not getting that SwiftKey can allow you to ...

1. set 3 languages,
2. allow you to type in those languages freely without the need to "switch" languages or switch input languages during typing. Meaning you can type each single word in any of the 3 languages have spell check done, proper accents etc (as that is the nature of languages; not trying to add more here).
3. allow the correct context of each language typed by you to be done on the fly without the need to be edited after or during typing.

This is what BB10 can do.
 
So ... 78.5 million units in 1 year or 385million just in 10yrs is a NICHE?!

All of the stats you provided were after the iPhone was released. Total smartphone sales in 2006 (before the iPhone was released) was around 50 million. About 5% of the mobile phone market. Now, smartphones are close to 50% of the entire mobile phone market and selling around 200 million in a single quarter.
 
QFT. I don't understand why people are expecting a redesigned OS, courtesy of Jony, only months after his involvement. Surely any such change would have already been in the works.

Back before the iPhone, the needs were very obvious (though admittedly, very difficult for a lot of manufacturers to solve). We all knew either in our heads or in our hearts, that we wanted access to our emails and the internet while we were away from our computers.

Today, we have that. With copy and paste. With multi tasking. With LTE speeds. And navigation systems. And appstores.

What is the great need that is not being fulfilled? Keyboard auto complete? Touchless gestures? Eyeball tracking? These sound like lipstick and eyeshadow to me. All aesthetic items that really only serve to make something look more attractive than it really is. And if not done well, only serves to uglify something that might have well been perfectly fine otherwise.

There are lots of interesting ideas out there. For example, why is my smartphone not better integrated to my car? Why doesn't my car have a display that mirrors the content of my phone and allow me to use my phone to drive car related functions? Why can't I check the status of my car (how much gas, how is the battery doing, do the brakes need to be worked on, etc.) remotely from my iPhone?

How about better home automation integration? Why is it such a PITA to make my house controllable by my smartphone? (Yes, I have been down this road. I have an ISY-994 controller, I have insteon devices, etc.)

Android can have the features that detect when a user is picking his nose. I would rather have features that solve everyday needs. And to do that, a brand new iOS is not necessarily what is needed but rather, a step back to ask, what problems do normal everyday people want to solve with these devices? And how can Apple enable these people to solve those problems?
 
Last edited:
Apple could easily crank out updates every week with flashy gimmicks galore (Hello Samstolen) however Apple prefers to only release finished (not Beta) quality products to market that customers actually use.

Because Siri was totally ready, and maps was totally ready to. Apple would never push out a turd ( Maps ), to save a couple bucks.
 
You're right, only if you look at what BB's done over the last three years. At one point, they were THE smartphone manufacturer to beat, and they brought a ton of interesting stuff to the scene.

It's not so much that BB never innovated, it's that they took their position for granted and quit trying to improve their products at all beyond a few spec bumps. There's a lesson in that for Apple and their fans.

I absolutely don't agree with that. I was a BB user for years, and years before moving to iPhone. Their PDA capability was always the worst of the major choices out there (i.e., Palm, etc.). What they did better and first was push email and security manageability for enterprise. Without that one killer feature Palm would have crushed them.
 
Because Siri was totally ready, and maps was totally ready to. Apple would never push out a turd ( Maps ), to save a couple bucks.

Fast, good and cheap. You can never have all three. Sometimes you can have two. Frequently, you can have only one. That's why we as consumers should be careful what we ask for. Because without Steve Jobs at the helm, Apple might just give it to us. And as history has shown, that's not always a good thing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.