Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So basically Apple DID breach the patent as it has had to change how the feature works to make it legal. Well at least they came up with a workaround. Personally I've never found the feature to be very useful as it is wildly inaccurate anyway.
False, it is highly accurate when taken intentionally, ie you keep your arm still and the watch is properly adjusted. The automatic tracking is bad because you're moving your arm around and probably dont wear the watch tight enough.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: D_J and Pezimak
More dependency on the iPhone isn’t a good thing. Too much and the appeal of the cellular model will go down hill then folks will be asking themselves why I have a watch at all when I also have a phone nearby.
Sir this is just a Workaround at the moment. In 2028 Masimo’s patent expires and Apple will be able to use the patent without having to pay for it and you can get the readings directly off the Apple Watch again ⌚️Apple is not paying Masimo $100 per device that would run into the billions.
 
😍 2025 could turn out to be Apple’s best year as long as they release a solid iPhone 17 Pro Update and Apple Watch as well.
I have to say with the Siri debacle, I can’t see this being its best year. I mean they have provided no evidence that they even have Siri going yet today. We just hope it comes out 18 months after it was promised with iPhones 16? So to me hardware sales with broken promises doesn’t equal best year ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kavik
If injunctions are that easy, we should have had them against all Samsung and Android devices back in the 2010s :)
Companies like Apple, Google, and Samsung use their patent portfolios as bargaining chips to essentially share or license technologies with each other. The difference with Masimo is that they aren't willing to license their patent to Apple for a reasonable price per unit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D_J and surferfb
Speaking as someone who is in the UK and therefore had this feature all along...

It's nice to have but probably not of any practical day to day use to most people, unless you've (sadly) got respiratory issues and/or multiple health issues.

And I guess it'll be an important early warning if you're going down with a serious virus.

But it's important to get what you paid for, so I'm glad that my US cousins will kinda sorta get this functionality.
 
I’m no patent expert but seems ridiculous that “processing it on device” can be trademarked— it must be the way it’s being processed on the device bypassed. If injunctions are that easy, we should have had them against all Samsung and Android devices back in the 2010s :)
So does that mean the following:
Will the paired iPhone must be in range in order to use this reintroduced feature?
 
For those of us itching to upgrade to a cellular AW so we can leave our iPhone at home for extended periods of time, I wonder how this would work for those days we leave the iPhone at home. Or forget it etc.
 
So basically Apple DID breach the patent as it has had to change how the feature works to make it legal. Well at least they came up with a workaround. Personally I've never found the feature to be very useful as it is wildly inaccurate anyway.

I suspect that the problem is that the courts have been interpreting the patents in an overbroad way that amounts to uses light to measure and calculate blood oxygen on a wrist worn device. This means that no matter how unique their method is, unless it uses different hardware, it's not going to be able to do this. Masimo lost key talent and has demonstrated that if you work for them you will have to work for them forever or will be a liability to any future employer, so that have limited the non-litigation business models available to them.
 
Congrats to apple on crushing a small company rather than engage in a licensing deal.
Small company? Compared to Apple, sure; but then again almost everyone is small compared to Apple.

Masimo has a market cap of over $11.5b and over $2B a year in revenue. They're listed on the S&P 500. We're not talking about a mom and pop shop here.
 
Does anyone know if it's actually accurate? My mom had breathing issues and has blood oxygen of around 82% according to professional equipment, however I have measured it with an Apple Watch and it said it was around 94-96%...
I have checked my watch readings while being tested at doctors office and it has been within 1% consistently
 
That's nice.

They still violated patents according to the the top ITC court, and still refuse to pay royalties therefore resulting in this half-a** solution.

Not that I particularly care; I gave up on the Apple Watch a few months back and returned to Garmin. I need about 90% more fitness features, and 90% less smartwatch features before coming back.
Garmin is great, but until they have cellular on device, Apple Watch wins for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WarmWinterHat
Companies like Apple, Google, and Samsung use their patent portfolios as bargaining chips to essentially share or license technologies with each other. The difference with Masimo is that they aren't willing to license their patent to Apple for a reasonable price per unit.

Nor are they be required to.

There is no rule where "X huge mega corp" comes along and says we want to license your IP ... and you have to.

That doesn't then give X huge mega corp the right to do it anyway, or bully you, or anything else.

None of us should be defending how Apple comported themselves here.

(not saying you specifically are defending Apple -- but too many are)

Imagine if some company came along and insisted on being able to license IP from Apple, but "Apple refused to do it for a reasonable price" ... Just imagine the forum thread here.

I've never been around a fan site that is THIS deep in cult like defense of everything the company does.
It's truly shocking how some will defend literally ANYTHING Apple does or says.
 
For those of us itching to upgrade to a cellular AW so we can leave our iPhone at home for extended periods of time, I wonder how this would work for those days we leave the iPhone at home. Or forget it etc.
You’ll probably be able to use the cellular AW to CALL the phone and someone nearby could check the O2 level for you, with a remote screen unlock function on the AW of course.

;-) (i spend 10 seconds looking for the facepalm emoji)
 
I hope us non-US folks will still have the ability to see the results on the watch itself. We never lost the O2 measurement capability.
My original Ultra still gives me the reading just nicely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mtrm
Doesn't that patent end in 2027 or something anyway? This company needs to just cut their losses and give it up. Apple will just drag it on until they can get it for free anyway.
 
I hope us non-US folks will still have the ability to see the results on the watch itself. We never lost the O2 measurement capability.
My original Ultra still gives me the reading just nicely.
If you want to know something, just read beyond the headline. The answer to your question is. right. there.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I have a Series 9 which I bought as an upgrade from my prior Series 6, before the ban on the feature took place. So I am not affected by this ridiculousness.

Still, while I don't believe it's a great workaround, it still weakens Masimo's position; and so to me, this is a turning point in this particular fight. Masimo needs to deal now, or go home with nothing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.